I have been correctly accused of remaining silent about 9/11. Although I frequently talk to 9/11 truth groups about various related topics such as Israel, Zionism and Jewish ID politics, I do not contribute to the discourse involving controlled demolitions and airplanes flying into buildings.
Engineering, construction and flying are not within my field of research. Though I am aware of many of the details to do with the 9/11 truth movement, I canât make any original scholarly contributions in this arena.
However, there are a few areas of my study that I think are important in relation to the 9/11 truth movement:
1.    The Mossadâs motto is âby way of deceptionâ and false flag operations are deeply rooted in the Mossadâs modus operandi.
2.   The prime beneficiary of 9/11 has been Israel. It was Zio-cons who pushed for the so-called âwar against terror.â In the name of democracy and Coca Cola the English speaking empire has been fighting Zionist conflicts for almost two decades.
3.   Most important, be aware that controlling the opposition is at the core of Zionist survival strategy.
The last point is one of the most important conclusions I draw in my latest book, Being in Time – a Post Political Manifesto.
When self-identified Jews notice that something about their culture, ideology or politics has become a problematic topic, some Jews often form Jewish satellite dissent. Once the Israeli Palestinian conflict evolved into a âJewish problem,â some ethically motivated Jews formed JVP (Jewish Voice for Peace), Mondoweiss and other pro-Palestinian Jewish bodies.
Within a short time these groups gained complete hegemony within the Palestinian Solidarity Movement. As soon as it became clear that the Neocon school is primarily an extended Zionist gathering and that Neocon wars are, in practice, Ziocon global conflicts, the âNeocon debateâ was reduced to an internal Jewish quarrel between rabid Zion-con Sam Harris and Anti-con Noam Chomsky.
But what about 9/11?
In my talks and writings I sarcastically suggest to my listeners that if Global Warming were to mature into a âJewish problem,â in a few hours we would see the formation of the newly ecologically aware âJews Against Global Warmingâ (JAGW I guess). It would probably take another week before the new Jewish body would take over the Anti Global Warming Movement and start to expel the so-called âanti-Semites.â
This scheme applies to 9/11 truth. As soon as some noticed that the truth movement had become an emerging âJewish problem,â we could see a growing number of infiltrators attempting to steer the movement away from Israel. This transition within the truth movement has made the 9/11 truth movement of great interest to me.
 Ludwig Watzal, Elias Davidsson and the Kosher Narrative
Following the recent duplicitous slander campaign against my work in Germany run by Elias Davidsson and Ludwig Watzal, I stumbled upon their comical 9/11 spin. Countercurrentsâ Are 9/11 Truthers Anti-Semites? An Interview With Elias Davidsson by Ludwig Watzal is a case study of an open, nonâapologetic attempt to sabotage a movement.
Watzal writes, âElias Davidsson is one of these âtruthersâ who challenges the official narrative on 9/11. He is also concerned about the claim made by some âtruthersâ that Israel was behind the attacks…â
Then we learn that Elias Davidsson is upset by Jew haters who keep referring to the âdancing Israelisâ and âthe canard that 4,000 Jews, who, forewarned, did not go to work to the World Trade Center on 9/11.â Larry Silverstein is also vindicated by our 9/11 âtrutherâ because âhe did not make any effort to cover his alleged tracks.
He leased the WTC just six weeks before 9/11, announced this lease to the world, insured it against terrorism for a whopping $3.2 billion and âadmittedâ in a documentary film to have given on 9/11 the authorization to âpullâ WTC 7.â According to our âkosher detectiveâ Davidsson, all this is evidence that Silverstein is innocent.
Why? Because âwe have here all the requisite elements: A greedy Jew, proximity to the crime, motive. It is precisely the high visibility of Larry Silverstein as an ideal villain that makes me (Davidsson) hesitate to implicate him in the crime. His alleged complicity is simply too obvious.â
Silverstein may well be innocent, although proximity to the crime, having a motive and high visibility are not elements of âvindication.â On the contrary, they justify intense scrutiny of Silversteinâs actions.
If Davidsson and Watzal had spent some time reading yours truly instead of fabricating statements and attributing them to me, they would know that I explain this. I contend that self identified Jews hardly conspire, they prefer to act in the open. Whether it is AIPAC, J-STRET, CFI, The CRIFF, Soros, Kushner or Israeli war crimes in Gaza, Jewish action is not disguised.
Jewish power, on the other hand, is the power to suppress discussion of Jewish power. Silverstein and Davidsson both provide evidence of my hypothesis. Silverstein acted in the open and Davidsson is obviously committed to suppressing discussion of Israel and Silverstein within the truth movement.
But âwhat might be the motives for linking Israel to 9/11?â Watzal wonders.
Davidsson answers, âwho are better placed as bogeymen than Jews or Israel? The Nazis used this method with great success.â
Apparently Davidssonâs role in the truth movement is identical to JVPâs role in the Palestinian solidarity movement. The self appointed commissars are there to label as âNazisâ those who do not adhere to the âcorrectâ narrative.
At this stage, I am not in any position to assess the role Israel might have played in 9/11. But I can easily evaluate Davidsson and Watzalâs kosher impetus. Both publicly attempt to steer the inquiry away from Israel or anything remotely Zionist.
Finally, Watzal asks Davidsson who did 9/11, to which Davidsson answers âI consider it beyond dispute that the US military planned and executed the mass-murder of 9/11 on behalf of the US elite (which, evidently, includes also persons of Jewish descent).â
Watzal and Davidsson inveigle to move the 9/11 movement to the realm of âbeyond dispute,â a territory in which Israel is clean and Silverstein has become a victim. In Davidssonâs âbeyond disputeâ land, once again, it is Goyim who are killing Goyim. Is it possible that both Davidsson and Watzal are too afraid of the 9/11 truth movement retaining its freedom to explore alternative narratives?
In his invaluable book Heidegger and the Jews, the French philosopher Jean-Francois Lyotard suggested that history claims to tell us what really happened, but in practice, it acts to conceal our collective shame.
In the above article I come short of labelling Watzal and Davidsson as Israeli agents or controlled opposition, but it is clear âbeyond disputeâ who and what the two are working hard to shove under the carpet.
Gilad Atzmon is an Israeli-born British jazz saxophonist, novelist, political activist, and writer.
Atzmon’s album Exile was BBC jazz album of the year in 2003. Playing over 100 dates a year, he has been called “surely the hardest-gigging man in British jazz.” His albums, of which he has recorded nine to date, often explore the music of the Middle East and political themes. He has described himself as a “devoted political artist.” He supports the Palestinian right of return and the one-state solution in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
His criticisms of Zionism, Jewish identity, and Judaism, as well as his controversial views on The Holocaust and Jewish history, have led to allegations of antisemitism from both Zionists and anti-Zionists. A profile in The Guardian in 2009 which described Atzmon as “one of London’s finest saxophonists” stated: “It is Atzmon’s blunt anti-Zionism rather than the music that has given him an international profile, particularly in the Arab world, where his essays are widely read.”
His book The Wandering Who? is available at Amazon.com
ATTENTION READERS
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.
About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
I have been intensively involved in the 9/11 truth movement since 2004, and have seen plenty of gatekeepers who try to steer the discussion away from Israeli involvement (and other fruitful topics). But Elias Davidsson is not really one of them. Elias is a very good researcher who has actually done more to overcome gatekeepers than help them. The gatekeepers’ #1 priority is “blame the Muslims” and the way they do that is to fail to debunk the absurd claim of “hijackings.” Elias has done excellent work showing there were no hijackings nor were any of the Muslim suspects on any of the planes. https://www.amazon.com/Hijacking-Americas-Mind-11-Counterfeiting/dp/0875869726 In recent years he has taken a somewhat shrill stand against the growing consensus that Israel was a major player, if not the prime mover, in 9/11. And he also picked an ill-advised fight with Gilad Atzmon. I hope these mistakes don’t prevent people from reading his excellent books on 9/11 and the Mumbai attacks. And I hope Elias is open-minded enough to eventually rethink some of his views. I plan to send him a review copy of Guyenot’s new book From Yahweh to Zion (available on Amazon by this weekend at the latest.)
Hello Kevin… i do not criticize Davidsson for what he didn’t say. I didn’t refer to his book either. Moreover, Davidsson is entitled to his views about Israeli innocence. What I reveal in the above paper is that Davidsson steers criticism away from Israel. He equate those who blame Israel with Nazis… If we believe in a free discourse, Davidsson and Watzal do not serve as a perfect example,, I guess you would agree with that… peace and Happy New Year G
The success rate of turning guys on the edge is significantly improved when 2 guys of equal stature with the target work together. Just time your letters. Cheers to you both, for providing the tools and work. Good combo.
Israel did 9/11/01. This article is only one of many. Frankly what other country could have done it? Who really believes people wandering around the rocks half way around the world pulled off this massive con on America? Only evil thugs in Israel could have done it. There is plenty of information now to bring all the criminals to trial but of course none of the Chicken…in the Injustice Dept. have the guts to do so. Also they value their lives don’t they?
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/Israel_did_it
Quote:
âą âLarry Silverstein – is a Jewish American businessman from New York. Silverstein obtained a 99 year lease on the entire world trade center complex on 24 July, 2001. [3] The towers were in fact close to worthless, being filled with asbestos, [4] yet Silverstein âfelt a compelling urge to own themâ. Silverstein had breakfast in “Windows on the World” restaurant (located in North Tower 107th Floor) every morning. [5] but broke this routine on the morning of 11 September 2001. Silversteinâs two children, who also worked in the WTC, were also absent from work that day. Larry Silverstein was paid a little over $4.5 Billion in insurance money as a result of the destruction of the WTC complex. [6] Silverstein was on personal friendship terms with Zionist media-magnate Rupert Murdoch, former Israeli president Ariel Sharon, as well as Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu. Silverstein was such good friends with Netanyahu that, according to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz
Quote:
“Frank Lowy, a Czechoslovakia born Jew, was the owner of Westfield America, one of the biggest shopping mall conglomerates in the world. Lowy leased the shopping concourse area called the Mall at the World Trade Center, made up of approximately 427,000 square feet of retail floor space.
Frank Lowy has an interesting history. He was a member of the Golani Brigade, and fought in the Israeli war of independence. Before this he was a member of Hagganah, a Jewish terrorist organization. He spends three months of the year at his home in Israel and has been described by the Sydney Morning Herald as “a self-made man with a strong interest in the Holocaust and Israeli politics.” He funded and launched the Israeli Institute for National Strategy and Policy, which will “operate within the framework of Tel Aviv University” in Israel. He is also close friends with many top Israeli officials such as Ehud Olmert, Ariel Sharon, Bibi Netanyahu, and Ehud Barak. He was implicated in an Israeli Bank Scandal with Olmert. [8] Frank Lowy was not at the WTC on 9/11.
Lewis Eisenberg – Eisenberg was the head of the Port Authority of New York and authorized the lease transfer to Silverstein and Lowy. [9] Eisenberg was a large contributor to the Bush-Cheney presidential campaign, as well as a partner in the Jewish bank Goldman-Sachs. Eisenberg has been both a member of the Planning Board of the United Jewish Appeal/United Jewish Federation pro-Israeli government pressure group in the U.S. [10]..”
Quote Con’t:
“Ronald Lauder – Billionaire EstĂ©e Lauder Cosmetics magnate. He was the chairman of NY Governor George Pataki’s commission on privatization. He is the key individual who lobbied for the privatization of the WTC [11] â but he was also instrumental in the successful privatisation of the former Stewart Air Force Base. Oddly, the flight paths of flight 175 and flight 11 converged directly over this airport. Map
Lauder is active in the following organizations:
Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations
Jewish National Fund
World Jewish Congress
American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee
Anti-Defamation League
Jewish Theological Seminary.
Lauder was elected president of the World Jewish Congress on 10 June, 2007.
Lauder founded a school for the Mossad in Herzliya, Israel called the Lauder School of Government Diplomacy and Strategy. He is arguably the key Sayan in the preparation of 9/11.”
As a “thank you” to liar, cheater con artist, bully draft dodger…Donald J. Trump, for his favor to move the Embassy to Jerusalem, he has likely been given a full briefing by the Mossad of how they pulled off 9/11 in Jew York that day. At the end of the meeting they all likely had a good laugh. You can bet he knows most of the sordid details now, if he didn’t before, but has not lifted a finger to prosecute any of the Jewish criminals, his friends and colleagues in crime, in Israel for this massive crime on America. Trump is the biggest Traitor to America who has ever held this high office. America is gone folks. Deal with it! Americans are the biggest fools on planet earth. Frankly they deserve their plight.
What other country besides Israel could have done 9-11-2001, wjabbe asks?
Well, Binomo is a prime suspect too.
If Gilad Atzmon had gone to the dark side instead of the light, he would have made a fine rabbi (that is a compliment, not an insult). It is quite the feat of a writer in his position (i.e. living in the UK and being under scrutiny of the Zionists) to say what needs to be said while not running afoul of the speech suppression laws.
Peace G
The biggest con in history is the idea that Christianity is descended from Judaism – yes it is descended from what is now called Karaite Judaism that is only practiced by a few small groups of Jews, but Talmudic Judaism post-dates Christianity, and of course Talmudic/Kabbalist Judaism is less than 600 years old. Without this con, “Christian-Zionism” and support of the Zionist occupation of Palestine by “western Christians” would not exist.
“Pull it”. Of all the ‘conveniently coincidental” things about Silverstein, this one is different.
Anything other than targeted planned demolition would imply, that secretly Bldg 7 was rigged from the onset which would mean others are too. That is inexplicable.
The other dead giveaway is Trump has not mentioned even a peep about it. Highly uncharacteristic for a guy who has mentioned everything else, but. Trump knows. Anybody who has ever worked with steel reinforced concrete does. Americans are the slowest to realize.
Back in the early 1990s (before the first attack on the WTC), we did a case study of WTC i/II in a structural engineering class. Although not my particular field of expertise, I have enough technical knowledge to say the official story of how the buildings collapsed does not pass the smell test. I also know that the engineers who produced the report were between a rock and a hard place of telling their real opinion and committing career suicide.
I definitely prefer engineers over architects, but a good builder who keeps track and lives long enough to check his work is all that is needed. Concrete testing is subjective and flunkies are used who wouldn’t know granite from sandstone. Guys who pour always prefer a 2 over a 3 but laborers prefer a 5. Steel can vary as much also. But, those towers and pentagon swallowing a flying tin can is preposterous. I was active duty when the story broke about adding the extra wall on the pentagon. It was during Reagan, with Bush sr as the CIA chief.
Enough is not made of that point. Why that wall out of five ? How long ago was this planned ?
David Odell – Testing of both fresh and cured concrete (and reinforcement) as well as structural steel (welds and connections) is hardly subjective, as there are ASTM, CRSI, AISC et al standards covering everything as well as ACI, AWS, etc individual certification and AMRL, CCRL etc laboratory certification.
Worker Bee ,.. in the field,..the schooling goes out the window. Temperature humidity and water and aggregate all vary from job to job , every quarry is different, and ASTM and NIST showed their true colors after 9/11
Talk to the guys who actually build with the stuff. And check their hands. Have you visited a scrap yard recently ? A quarry ? Haven’t you wondered why bridges crumble and yard walls from the 1800’s still stand ?
Thanks Gilad,
There has been no objective refutations to the mountain of evidence tying Israel to 9/11. All Iâve ever seen is Jewish apologists libeling people with nonsensical accusations of “antisemitism”. They must assume people like me get some kind of enjoyment out of pointing at Israel for the crime of 9/11. I donât like saying it anymore than anyone likes hearing it. But if itâs true, than whether I or anyone else likes it-or not, is irrelevant. Somebody, (I canât remember who) said, “The truth sounds like hate-speech to people who hate the truth.”
No one questions where the F-16 were? Usually any commercial plane goes off course NORAD is alerted. Anytime a regular plane goes off course, the F-16 are scrambled. That’s what was the first thing wrong in my mind on 9/11. The other Obvious one was where is the massive plan wreckage at the Pentagon. None. It was a big cruise missile shot from somewhere that hit it. IF anybody can’t see that their deaf as well as blind.
Comments are closed.