Why Won’t Francis “Meet” Me? Do Not Impede My “Traditionalist” Conscience!

We are on a slippery slope away from Catholicism into the New Age Religion of the False Prophet and Antichrist (Man of Lawlessness) who hides behind “free-thinking consciences”.


Why Won’t Francis “Meet” Me? Do Not Impede My “Traditionalist” Conscience!
By: Eric Gajewski

The end result of the illicit teaching of “liberty of conscience” produces a group of “free thinking” liberals who are helping to pave the way for the arrival of the Antichrist. The New Religion embraces everyone EXCEPT anyone who does not embrace them. Ironically the end of all this “free” thinking is chaos and disorder. We are on a slippery slope away from Catholicism into the New Age Religion of the False Prophet and Antichrist (Man of Lawlessness) who hides behind “free-thinking consciences”.

This past year the False Pope Bergoglio told an atheist that he would “meet” him. Meet him where you might ask? Meet him on the level of “conscience” alone. Assuredly, this, should have thrown up red flags, for those, who identify, as Catholic but largely it did not. As I mentioned on the SGTREPORT yesterday churchmen are in a zombielike state. Their errors on Religion have blinded them. Some have never known what it is to be truly Catholic and still others no longer want to be known as a Catholic (in the old and proper sense).

Why would Francis tell an atheist that he would meet him at the “summit” of “conscience” and yet constantly attack real Catholics these days by labeling us rigorists, Pharisees or fundamentalists?

Why won’t he meet us Catholics in our conscience? It is because Francis, being a modernist, does teach the truth. He believes truth is relative to one’s conscience, therefore, all one has to do is obey it. No longer is doctrine central for our unity but rather this erroneous understanding of conscience. They (modernist’s) say they are searching for truth! We, Catholics, present it and they don’t want it because they are thirsty after novelty. It only proves that Francis is not only hypocritical but double minded.

Nay, those who simply don’t go with the Vatican II “new” gospel are simply labeled as heretics or being outside the Church (or you still need a practical agreement!) whence, in reality, it is the other way around.

It is time we stop playing nice with these heretic’s folks.

Liberty of conscience is a masonic principle. Let us listen to what Pope Pius XI has to say on the matter.
“Where then, is this liberty of thinking and acting that the Assembly grants to man in society as an indisputable natural right? Is this invented right not contrary to the right of the Supreme Creator to whom we owe our existence and all that we have? Can we ignore the fact that man was not created for himself alone, but to be helpful to his neighbor? …
Man should use his reason first of all to recognize his Sovereign Maker, honoring Him and admiring Him, and submitting his entire person to Him. For, from his childhood, he should be submissive to those who are superior to him in age; he should be governed and instructed by their lessons, order his life according to their laws of reason, society and religion. This inflated equality and liberty, therefore, are for him, from the moment he is born, no more than imaginary dreams and senseless words.”

Pius VI, Brief Quod aliquantum, of March 10, 1791, in Recueil des Allocutions, Paris: Adrien Leclere, 1865, pp. 53-55.

This Masonic principle is undermining Truth/church teaching and placing it in the hands of man. It is all a part of the Vatican II, cult of man. It gives me a right publicly to profess whatever I like on the matters of Religion and therefore produce’s a society wherein “anyone can be right”. It ties in with the false ecumenical program of Vatican II wherein one is supposed to lay aside our “differences” and unite falsely with someone who doesn’t hold the truth. Truth binds us yet Vatican II new “truth” creates a jambalaya of error.

Don’t get caught in the Vatican II pot.


Comments Closed


  1. 6th — 7th century BCE — sorry —————-

    “Archaeology has helped us to reconstruct the history behind the Bible, both the early books of the Bible and their famous stories of early Israelite history were first codified (and in key respects composed) at an identifiable place and time: Jerusalem in the seventh century BCE.

  2. Respect is earned, not given. Global society is exponentially increasing the number of rules and laws beyond human imagination. There is zero chance, for lawlessness. The US has 22 million federal employees. Counting the teachers, priests, local police, courts and town or county legislators, there are barely any civilians.
    Creation and enforcement of laws and rules is the largest sector of world economy.
    Fear not impending lawlessness. We could reduce laws by 50% and still be by far the most closely governed humans in history. With cameras in our bedrooms and and every public place. If I fart too loud the fire department shows up.

  3. All discourse on religion is a waste of valuable time that could be spent on figuring out 9/11 , who was responsible for WWI & WWII & other important questions that the public have been historically hoodwinked about..
    Professor Israel Finkelstein Finkelstein a leading Israeli archeologist in his book “The Bible Unearthed” states that utilizing Archaeological, Biblical and Historical evidence claims that All The Books of The Bible from Genesis through 2Samuel are MYTH & created created by the Pharisees & Scribes in Jerusalem in the 7th and 6th Centuries.
    God didn’t promise the Land of Israel to Abraham because there was NO Abraham, or Isaac, or Jacob, or Joseph, 12 tribes, Moses, Joshua, etc.

    There was no Exodus, or Blitzkrieg conquest of Canaan by Joshua.

    None of this stuff ever happened. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are all based on FICTION…

Comments are closed.