Shrimpton: Fire and Fury

Michael Shrimpton defends the President and savages Michael Wolff's new book

A wolff in a woollen suit

Editor’s note:  Michael represents, often as not, a dissenting opinion at VT.  He is here because Michael has “standing” in the intelligence community.  He is the real deal.  He earned the right to say what he wants, did jail time for it as well.

Shrimpton’s story outlining the recovery of a nuclear weapon threatening the 2012 London Olympics has been 80% confirmed.  He was jailed for breaking one of the biggest stories in history.  He is also a person of honor.  Gordon Duff

Michael Wolff’s book Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House was clearly published as part of an attempt to destabilize the Trump Administration. He virtually admits as much, referring (page 294) to the XXVth Amendment, under which the Cabinet, including the Vice-President, can remove the elected President for incapacity.

I have of course read the book, although I am pleased to say that my copy was supplied to me as a PDF file. It’s a heavy read, makes repeated factual errors and is desperately lacking in objectivity. President Trump has already demolished Wolff’s claim to have interviewed him.

Who set the President up?

This is the real question, not whether the President is incompetent within the meaning of XXV(4). That is not a live issue. Whatever demented Democrat quacks might say President Trump is fully fit, both mentally and physically, to discharge the heavy responsibilities of his office. Any assertion to the contrary, frankly, is just political psychiatry, coming from people who don’t respect democratic norms.

Michael Wolff of course has no psychiatric qualifications. He’s only a journalist, and not a terribly competent one at that, with respect. Moreover he’s an avowed political opponent of President Trump.  Wolff clearly cannot get over Hillary Clinton’s defeat. There’s also the gay thing. So far as I know, Wolff is gay, which is fine by me. So am I. There is however strong anti-Trump feeling in parts of the LGBT community, to the point where objectivity in those parts of the community has been lost. For whatever reason, Wolff’s book lacks objectivity.

The fact that Wolff (along it must be said with most liberal journalists) didn’t see Donald Trump’s historic victory coming just goes to show what a poor journalist he is, no offense intended. Donald Trump’s victory was entirely predictable. I could see it coming, from over three thousand miles away.

The immediate author of the set-up is the person who gave Wolff that blue badge. It wasn’t the President, nor did he authorize it. The evidence points to Reince Priebus, who was very properly fired as the President’s Chief of Staff at the end of July. Key interviews took place in Priebus’s office, and Priebus himself controled access to the White House at the material time.

Bad faith use of the XXVth Amendment to remove an elected president is effectively a coup, potentially justifying military intervention, one of the reasons why the power has never been used. There’s no way that Priebus would have sanctioned a book as explosive as this without backing. It’s believed that he reports to President Bush 41.

41 is known to have been violently opposed to Trump’s selection as the Republican nominee. He’s also close to the ChiComs, whose thinly-disguised plan for world economic domination, subsidized by offshore high-yield trading programs, is threatened by the Trump Administration’s pro-America policies. It is not known whether 41 supported the plot to assassinate Donald Trump at his Inauguration in January.

I understand that different views on that topic are held within INTELCOM. 41 has not publicly denied backing the plan to assassinate the President, which was of course illegal, but neither has he admitted it, indeed his public posture is one of pretending that it didn’t happen. That’s usually the case with failed assassination plots of course – the DVD still won’t admit to having tried to murder me in 1999! I express no view either way and will leave it to 41 to state his position on the assassination plot.

DC, BTW, is one of the US jurisdictions which encourages murder by having soft sentences, one reason why there are so many murders in the nation’s capital. Murdering a sitting President, let alone a President-elect, isn’t treason, although it would be a federal offense, as well as a non-capital felony in DC. The death penalty was abolished in DC in 1980, presumably as part of the long-term planning for the assassination of Ronald Reagan.

So far as I know 41, who still has great influence over the federal bureaucracy, has countermanded President Trump’s orders on withdrawing from the Paris Climate Agreement (the US is still a state party, despite Congress never having ratified the Agreement), building the Wall (not a mile is in place) and moving the US Embassy to Jerusalem (the US Embassy in Israel is still located some 40 miles away from the capital, in Tel Aviv). My analysis is that the book was sanctioned by 41 as part of a softening-up process for the removal of President Trump under the XXVth Amendment to the US Constitution.

XXVth Amendment

The key part is Section 4, which reads as follows:

“Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. Thereupon Congress shall decide the issue, assembling within forty-eight hours for that purpose if not in session. If the Congress, within twenty-one days after receipt of the latter written declaration, or, if Congress is not in session, within twenty-one days after Congress is required to assemble, determines by two-thirds vote of both Houses that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall continue to discharge the same as Acting President; otherwise, the President shall resume the powers and duties of his office.”

Although somewhat clumsily worded (you don’t need to look up the date to tell that it wasn’t drafted by Thomas Jefferson) the meaning and intent of XXV(4) is clear – Vice-President Pence and the majority of the Cabinet would have to sign off on it, following which the President could appeal to Congress. The requirement for a 2/3 majority in both houses means that 41’s acolytes in the Senate couldn’t force the President out by colluding with the Democrats.

The modern Democratic party is sleazier now than it has been at any time in its history. I have no doubt that the party would vote en bloc to remove President Trump, not because its legislators seriously believed the President to be incompetent, but for party political advantage. However I doubt there would be enough Republican support. Using the nuclear option of applying the XXVth Amendment in bad faith would tear the party apart.

There could be no question of good faith. The President is physically fitter than many of his predecessors – FDR e.g. was disabled, poor man, and desperately ill when he bravely ran again in November ’44. JFK was still suffering from the effects of his wartime service in the Navy and Ronald Reagan carried on for nearly eight years after a German agent tried to murder him. Admittedly of these examples only Ronald Reagan served after the XXVth Amendment came into force, but an informal procedure was available beforehand.

The President is far more rational than his predecessor, with respect, who apparently believes in man-made climate change and probably sold his winter woollies years ago. Rejection of man-made climate change is of course a litmus test for rationality. It is more than ironic that Wolff, whilst calling President Trump’s sanity into question, repeatedly asserts (page 141, e.g.), that not only is the world warming up, but that man is responsible.

A refusal to face facts is of course one facet of irrationality. To put out a book arguing that the world is warming up in the middle of the worst winter for decades, with snow piled high in the streets, is scarcely the act of a rational man. To believe that humanity can affect the planet’s climate, the biggest single influence on which is the Sun, is delusional. The belief may be widely-shared, but then millions of Americans think that Russia tried to influence the outcome of the 2016 election. Millions of Brits, including many MPs, think that membership of the EU is in Britain’s economic interest when the trade deficit with the EU in goods is over $2.5 billion a week.

The fact that many people may share it doesn’t make your delusional belief rational or factual. Millions believe that Americans never walked on the Moon, although the landings were actually televized and the Apollo spacecraft were tracked there and back. A huge majority of people once believed that the Sun orbited the Earth. Most Aztecs were convinced that the Earth would stop orbiting the Sun unless they ritually murdered helpless victims on a daily basis. There have been no end of widely-held irrational beliefs.

Section XXV(4) clearly has no application to the present facts. What would happen if it were to be used in bad faith to remove the President?

Possible consequences of using Article XXV

Forcing out an elected President in this way would be a denial of democracy. It would effectively amount to a rejection of the US Constitution by the Democratic Party and centrist Republicans. Centrists by their very nature tend to be anti-democratic – they usually believe in bureaucracy, not democracy, or in supra-national control, like the neo-fascist Liberal Democrats in Britain.

One possible consequence would be a Second Civil War. One of the most noticeable things about modern American elections is the geographical split. Democrats tend to hug the coasts, whereas Republicans tend to be in the so-called ‘flyover’ states, so called because Democrats and liberals wouldn’t dream of actually driving thru them.

There is already talk of secession in California, although, since California is pretty much semi-detached from the United States already, maybe I should say “further secession”. (The San Andreas Fault is one of the few geographic fault lines which reflects a political reality). If the Democrats and centrist Republicans force the President out the talk of secession would come from Republican states, the ones which actually make and grow things and whose young people actually serve in the Armed Forces.

Since the Army and Marines Corps tend to come from Republican states, President Pence, who is no Lincoln anyway, would have trouble putting down the rebellion by force. The fact that most National Guard units have recent combat experience isn’t going to help matters.

Contrary to all appearances, the Pentagon aren’t stupid. The Joint Chiefs will be fully aware that defeating the Mid-West and the South won’t be as easy as defeating the South was in the first Civil War. Texas alone would prove a formidable challenge for an invading army.

Despite repeated staged shootings of American schoolkids, church congregations and music festivals, German Intelligence hasn’t yet managed to disarm America, thankfully. Most Republican states have sane gun laws, an added complication for anyone contemplating a coup against a Republican President.

An alternative would be military intervention. The Joints Chiefs will be uncomfortably aware that most military coups are led by colonels, not generals. Chile in 1973 was a rare exception, the takeover (coup is such a strong word) being led by my dear old friend General Pinochet. He’s still the nicest military dictator I’ve ever met, BTW. As he reminded me, he wasn’t that keen on the idea of the Chilean military taking over. He was pushed into it by the unconstitutional conduct of the DVD’s Salvador Allende, not that my old friend knew in 1973 that Allende was a German spy.

The nicest military dictator I’ve ever met

Usual procedure is for the coup (or in this case, counter-coup) leaders to shoot the chiefs of staff. In America I am sure it would be done nicely, indeed they would probably be handed an automatic with a round in the chamber and none in the mag, and invited to shoot themselves. They would be given a few moments in which to compose themselves and be buried with full military honors, along with their careers of course.

My guess however is that Mike Pence and the Cabinet will be reluctant to tear up the Constitution, which is what they would be doing if they used the XXVth Amendment in circumstances where it had no application. They would also be risking a firing squad, of course, as would the Democratic leadership in Congress, who might not even find themselves being offered a last cigarette. It would be one way of draining the swamp, I suppose!

The other flaws in Wolff’s book

Fire and Fury is seriously flawed. Apart from anything else most of it is not sourced. Wolff claims to have tape recordings and notes but these have not been released. The President is denying Wolff’s claim to have interviewed him – they seem to have met once, and then only briefly.

Of the quoted sources it’s unlikely that Steve Bannon has been accurately cited. The President seems to have retaliated – at any rate Steve was quickly forced out of Breitbart, a decision which Breitbart might come to regret, since he was their one remaining big name. I am far from convinced however that Wolff has treated Bannon, whom he despises, fairly.

There are a number of basic factual errors, such as who attended which working breakfast. Wolff has convinced himself that there were only a few hundred thousand attendees at President Trump’s Inauguration (page 31), even though the oft-repeated images of a small crowd were taken after the Inauguration, i.e. as the crowd dispersed. If CNN had waited till 3 am of course the crowd would have been even smaller. Curiously, Wolff also blames Syria for the Turkish WMD attack at Khan Shaykhun (I’m serious – he really does believe that Syria was responsible (page 187)).

For what it’s worth I estimate the crowd at the Inauguration to have been smaller than it was for Obama’s first Inauguration, but larger than for the second, but with a far higher percentage of out-of-towners than both. Wolff’s mistake over the crowd pales in comparison however to the howler on page 254, where he asserts, as though it were an established fact, that Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya was a Russian “agent”.

There is no credible evidence that Veselnitskaya, who was found not to be in possession of any actionable intelligence on Hillary Clinton, was a Russian agent. If she was anybody’s agent she was far more likely to have been a German agent, since the DVD set the meeting up as part of its back-up plan if their favored candidate, the Democrat, lost to Trump. Since the DVD have interfered in every US presidential election since 1948, getting one of their agents elected more than once, and the Soviets/Russians have interfered in none, a connection to German intel is far more likely than a connection to Russian intel.

My analysis, already published here, is that Veselnitskaya was nobody’s agent, but a ‘useful idiot’, no offense intended, made use of by the DVD. The meeting itself was hardly treasonous – it is not illegal to research your opponent in a presidential race, it is not illegal for a US citizen to talk to foreign nationals and presidential campaigns are not limited to US-registered corporations and individuals when conducting opposition research. The DNC after all instructed a British company close to MI6 to research Donald Trump.

Wolff, who has no legal training, also gets his facts wrong on Mueller, calling him “a special prosecutor” (page 241). Fact check: Mueller is a special counsel, serving at the pleasure of the President. The idea that James Comey is a man with “personal honor” and “moral standing” (page 244) only has to be stated for its absurdity to be apparent. Comey was a Director of the FBI, for heaven’s sake! How could he possibly have personal honor and moral standing? He was one of the senior FBI bureaucrats who kept quiet about Obama’s ineligibility to be president.

The biggest mistake of fact of all however is Wolff’s risible assertion that Donald Trump was not intending to win, and didn’t think he would win. This is just nonsense on stilts, no offense intended. Donald Trump is a winner. He wanted to win, fought hard but clean, and won. Jared Kushner may have had his doubts, but Jared Kushner is not Donald Trump.

What the book gets right

Wolff does get some things right. I respectfully agree with his analysis (pages 28 and 81, e.g.) that Jared Kushner is close to the ageing, Hillary-supporting media tycoon Rupert Murdoch. I also respectfully agree with the analysis that Kushner and Gary Cohn are “New York Democrats” (page 150). Since Steve Bannon’s firing, Kushner has been pulling the President, with some success, towards Hillary Clinton’s program. Like many on the left Kushner has little belief in democracy, with respect: it does not seem to trouble him that he is using his privileged access to the President to push policy positions which have been rejected by the American electorate.

I also respectfully agree with the analysis that Kushner is close to Henry Kissinger and the Chinese kingpin Jinping (page 196). Kushner’s strategy appears to be to hand the Rust Belt states to the Democrats in 2020 by transferring their jobs to China.


Wolff is an intelligence illiterate, with respect, who seems never to have heard of the DVD. Prior to the publication of Spyhunter he may have had some excuse, but he has no excuse for writing in the field and not keeping up with the literature.

I have been asked whether in my opinion he is a DVD operative, but my assessment is he lacks the brains to be an intelligence officer, no offense intended. The ease with which he was fooled by the DVD’s man-made global warming and Russian election interference hoaxes suggest that he is a man of limited intellect, even by the low standards of his profession. He has nowhere near the intellectual firepower of the President, e.g., who has seen through both German hoaxes.

The book is so badly-written and so poorly-sourced, with respect, and its fundamental conclusions – that President Trump never wanted or expected to be President and is unfit for that office – so absurd that little weight will be given to them. The book will be bought in large numbers, but mainly by people who are already anti-Trump and wish to reinforce their prejudices. Thankfully, both a Second American Civil War and military intervention in Washington are unlikely. The book has however exposed the dangers of the badly-drafted and ill-thought-thru XXVth Amendment, which should be repealed.

This week’s movie review: Star Wars: Episode VIII,

The Last Jedi (2017, dir. Rian Johnson)

After plowing thru Michael Wolff’s book it was a relief to turn to something a little more intellectually stimulating. The Last Jedi is a great science-fiction movie, the eighth instalment in a franchise going back to 1977. I’m so old I can remember watching the first movie (Episode IV) in theater!

Democrats won’t like it, as the Good Guys win. Leavers in the UK are loving it however – the movie’s message, that evil empires can be defeated, is resonating strongly here. The movie is unlikely to go down well over in the EU, not least as Supreme Leader Snoke is so reminiscent of Jean-Claude Juncker, no offense intended.

The series has always been political. The Stormtoopers are modeled on, well, stormtroopers. Brexiteers have long drawn parallels between the Evil Empire and the EU. The plots may be set a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, but there are parallels close to home.

The production standards are at least as good as the previous episode in this third trilogy. Disney have done well, and I don’t just mean at the box office, although they deserve every last cent.

A Star Wars movie does not require great acting – they didn’t really need Sir Alec Guinness for Episode IV. That being said, Mark Hamill turns in a fine performance as Luke Skywalker and there is a delightful posthumous appearance from the late, lamented Carrie Fisher, reprising her role as Princess Leia Organa. Her untimely death was such a shame.

The sound track is well-written and superbly performed. It’s really rather good.

The movie addresses stirring themes – courage in the face of evil, steadfastness in the face of adversity, love in the face of hate and sacrifice for a greater cause. It’s wonderful that our young people are watching it in huge numbers, on both sides of the Atlantic. They will find much to inspire them. There are Evil Empires to destroy on Earth, in Brussels, Teheran and Peking.

All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. MLK Day was yesterday, never a happy day for me. First MLK, and then his brother, their father, all preachers. All hits, imo, although the last two were more stealthy.

  2. Johnny, I am trying to be fact-based and dry, but like everyone else, I have bad days. For me, those days are the birth or death days of people I loved. Some of them were murdered. On those days, patience is not my strong suit. Since Dec 18, there have been 7 of those days for me.

  3. I trust this article was at least more readable than the book it reviews! I found it quite readable.
    I am so far from any expert on what the various secret (intelligence?) organizations around the globe are actually up to that I cannot honestly comment on most of Mr. Shrimpton’s material.
    However, I like to pop in from time to time to remind readers that ET is a factor missed by most commentators, and may well be at work behind these issues, as well as numerous others. As Mr. Shrimpton bemoans Mr. Wolff’s lack of awareness of the DVD, similarly do I bemoan the general lack of awareness of the ET intervention. I could at least hope, couldn’t I?, that at least some political writers would be at least dimly aware of this and at least mention it as a possible factor. Outside of the most obvious Earth-bound players, who, after all, would stand to benefit most from a planet divided and at war?

  4. Thanks for the vote of confidence, but no, I am not Shrimpton. And I am a she. Maybe I should go to law school when I have time…

  5. Above article says, “Murdering a sitting President, let alone a President-elect, isn’t treason, although it would be a federal offense, as well as a non-capital felony in DC.” That deserves a comment. Murdering a President isn’t treason IF you can successfully organize it and pass off the perp or the patsy as a “lone demented nutcase”. And regardless of how ridiculous the argument is (“magic bullet” comes to mind) we have had nothing but “lone demented nutcases” in every OPEN attempted assassination that I can think of. That is the hallmark of conspiracy in the US, that it is argued to NOT be a conspiracy, no matter how laughable the argument. I put the word OPEN in caps, because we have also had many HIDDEN assassinations, with planes, trains, and auto “accidents”, heart attacks, people “accidentally” falling off high buildings, being mugged even though nothing is stolen, etc. all being popular methods.

  6. The normal US Presidential line of succession is Vice President, Speaker of the House of Representatives, President pro tempore of the Senate, and then the heads of federal executive departments who form the Cabinet, if and only if those persons are also eligible to be POTUS, ie they must be natural-born citizens. But current COG (continuity of gov’t) plans call for a Designated Survivor for events that bring all these people together, such as an Inauguration, State of the Union address, POTUS Address to a Joint Session of Congress, etc. Trump inauguration on Jan 20, 2017 had as designated survivors 2 people, President pro tem of the Senate Orrin Hatch, and Jeh Johnson, Obama’s Homeland Security Secretary. Yikes! For Trump’s Feb 28, 2017 Address to a Joint Session of Congress, the designated survivor was Trump’s new Secretary of Veterans Affairs, David Shulkin, MD.

    • In the past, I mistakenly thought that it was the Senate Majority leader (currently Mitch McConnell) who was in the Presidential Line of Succession. But no. The guy in line is the President pro tem of the Senate, chosen by the Senate at the beginning of each Congress. In practice, they pick the most senior (longest-serving) senator of the majority party, and this position is currently held by Orrin Hatch. When he retires in January, the position will likely be handed over to the next longest-serving Senator in the majority party. So take a good look at both parties, people, and see who is the longest-serving Senator in each party. One of those 2 is who you will get as President pro tem, for good or ill.

    • And the President pro tem of the Senate (currently Orrin Hatch) isn’t the same as the President of the Senate, who is the sitting VP of the Admin when he assumes the chair as Pres. of the Senate (1 person wears 2 hats, so to speak, and currently that is Mike Pence). The President pro tem is selected at the start of each Congress, and he takes over when the President of the Senate is not there. I try to remember to say the full title including “pro tempore” or “pro tem” because THAT is the person in the line of succession right behind the Speaker of the House, but sometimes I get lazy and omit the “pro tem”. My bad.

  7. The 25th (XXV) Amendment is hot now, which was Wolff’s stated intent, and which seems to be Plan B now that their planned assassination of Trump failed. The 25th’s history is important. This was US Sen. Birch Bayh’s, introduced after the JFK assassination, intended to take care of either Pres. or VP vacancies, including temporary illness. The 25’s Section 2 about VP vacancies – has been used. Sections 1 and 3 have been used, with 3 being used several times while POTUS was undergoing planned surgery. Section 4 is oddly worded, but wording still clearly indicates it’s meant to be used in case of an UNPLANNED health emergency of POTUS such as a sudden illness or assassination attempt. Section 4 also provides for POTUS to resume his duties after he transmits to the President of the Senate and the Speaker of the House his declaration that no inability exists. Section 4 COULD have been used, but wasn’t, when Reagan got shot and was undergoing surgery, but the VP was on a plane flying back to DC, and Reagan was out of surgery before Bush arrived.

  8. I’m too prejudiced to fully understand Mr.Shrimptonsl viewpoints. At first read I don’t quite understand him; at second read it becomes clearer. Tonight with a glass of wine I’ll reread this and give it a ponder. Notice I didn’t say I’ll have a German Lager.

    • Peter is wrong again. Shrimpton was jailed PRECISELY to prevent him from talking about Germans. TVP raided his house on April 20, 2012, the SAME day that the 2 London Olympics nukes were exfiltrated from the UK. Shrimpton had already outed their plan to blow up the London Olympics, so the nukes were removed. But they made sure he was “in custody” that day while the exfiltration was going on. A 2nd motive for the raid was that they were there to steal all copies of Shrimpton’s unpublished book, which is why his computers and flash drives were stolen. But he had copies offshore, and Spyhunter was published anyway. Thames Valley Police – well, the Keystone Cops of silent film fame were better cops.

    • Yes, Johnny A, Hitler’s birthday was a nice touch, and I definitely noticed it at the time. TVP are idiots, but they were dispatched by somebody with an anniversary date in mind. Hitler’s birthday is always a popular anniversary date in the US, as it comes right after Patriot’s Day, and so Operatives aim for one or the other or both.

  9. I do not get this DVD German thing , are these the same Germans who’s message encryption device produced messages that everyone could read during WW2. Is it a code word for Jews. I thought the Jews ran Hollywood , the USA , the UK , Germany and until 1991 all of Eastern Europe and the Germans just did nice expensive cars.
    If you fancy a long stint in a high security prison in Germany just stand on a corner and shout the Holocaust is a lie, never happened.

    • RouterAI, I don’t know what country you are in. In the US, you can say the Holocaust is a lie if you want to. It’s called the 1st Amendment. People might call you an idiot for saying so, and that’s their 1st Amendment right too. Hate speech laws, which usually start as good intentions, usually go too far, and Germany is a good example of that. There is a narrow case to be made for laws against speech that causes bad things to happen. For example, in most areas, you can’t yell “Fire” or “Bomb” in a crowded building, because people could stampede and die. But any law against hate speech must be very very narrow to be any good. Usually such laws cause more harm than good, as they stifle real discussion and scholarship.

    • Obviously, if a person actually sees a fire or bomb in a building, he/she needs to say so. In the case above, I was referring to criminals who might falsely say such things in ORDER to cause a stampede; that happens once in a while.

  10. I think Mr. Shrimpton summarized some profound ideas around the content of the book, which also touch the intentions behind it and the moment of its delivery.

    Where I’m disagreeing is, when he tries to invent a new political category of somewhat “nice dictator”, a rather fuitless try to wash Pinochet clean of the at least 35000 murders which took place after his US organzied coup as some testing ground for the things to come in the world from the Chicago boys.

    It is interesting to see, how simple it is for him to come to the diametral opposing conclusions with regard to Alliende, compared to what he just formerly said with respect to Trump. Don’t get me wrong, I’m no leftist, but the transparent try to black paint Alliende with a simple remark (his personal opinion) does not justify the happenings we saw in 1973 in Chile and then in some other states around the area. What is the underlying principle for this obvious inconsistent thinking?

    I have to admit that I repeatedly enjoyed Mr. Shrimptons fantastic DVD story. Having just read his book even strengthened this urge to learn more about this fascinating imaginary German Verteidigungs Dienst benaeth Dachau, so I could finally write my own fictional book about the most secret, most unknown and most powerful Agency in the world – and I thought Echelon worked.

    • Glad to see you read Spyhunter. Sad to see you think the DVD complex under and around Dachau is imaginary. But that’s what satellites are for, to smoke out these things. And the satellites DID see some interesting things there, including people…

  11. The title of Wolffs book, Fire and Fury. Intentionally or not, it’s the same title as a history book by Randall Hansen, about the Allied bombing of Germany from 1942-45. Wolff’s book was unavailable in stores on the day of its release, except to people who had pre-ordered. News that day was that plenty of people ended up buying the wrong book, which WAS available, resulting in a nice flurry of sales for Hansen. I just checked on Amazon and, sure enough, Hansen’s paperback is currently the #1 bestseller in German History, and the Kindle version of his book is #2, even though his book came out in 2009. Hansen has no complaints, of course.

  12. Chris, I saw that gesture from 41; the video made the news. Good point about JFK Jr, whose death in a small plane was no accident.

  13. It’s time to round up the Loyalists again, and ship them home on one of those nasty cruise ships with broken toilets and rotten food. Currency stays at the port. See only the British can create an annoying problem like the apartheid in Palestine, so they should fix it. Maybe we could salvage some friendships in Europe if we set up a blockade in the channel with a few carriers and subs. Hey Britain, here’s what I think of your royal weddings and opinions (breaks the full dvd set of Game of Thrones over John Olivers head) and keep your crummy comedians, and propaganda movies,..they are not funny. Now screw off. Don’t call us, we’ll call you.

    • Folks should note the insult of FDR too. Next time someone is pounding a bully in the face, don’t go help the bully. Look at what we get for that. How typical. Like smoking fine cigars and drinking cognac while watching Grenfell burn , all the while wearing a devious smile. That is what you are looking at folks. The Shard was a touche.

    • David, it sounds like you’ve been watching too many propaganda movies. You do know that Hollywood is German-dominated, right? It wouldn’t kill you to read a few books. Publishing here in the US is also German-dominated, but there are a few good imprints.

    • “It wouldn’t kill you to read a few books.” I am prepared with my evidence to the contrary.
      “Hollywood is German-dominated”. Someone needs to make up their minds, I keep hearing Jewish. I could care less, but when I gear British accents, I see Monarchy and Death. That’s how and why I am in America.

      “there are a few good imprints.” Exactly, the best description of what books do I have seen in a while. The mind is a hard drive that cannot be erased. be careful what you copy into it. Skuul is dangerous.

    • Btw, the mind is not a hard drive, thank God. And hard drives can be erased, although it takes a few passes to do a good job.

    • JS, I hope you are attending local meetings and speaking up. The example of memory and continuity of task related behaviors based on simple programming will be there waiting to test your theory of being able to erase them so easily. The delusion of “convincing” is not a productive work order. Changing behavior by way of triggering “shame of not knowing” is more functional. We can overwrite the existing programming, but ridding a single generation of it, is not possible, or at least futile. It is at best, a multi-generational process.

  14. The British have reinvaded the US. I believe this is the fourth time. I think this whole Russian thing has the stench of old school British elitism all over it. If Wolff did anything, he distracted the entire populace by way of joke material for all the British comedians that seem to keep taking over here. I don’t know if anyone else is paying attention, but I hear more and more and more British accents everywhere talking about American politics. How much more Trumpish can a country get than to place the word ‘great” in front of it’s name and in one fell swoop become great again. We should abolish English as our language, and maybe start teaching Navaho as required linguistics in grade school. It would give us an edge over Britain and China. No guns.

    • Chris, I don’t need a book to tell me when some snobby bully elitist is acting like a jerk. I don’t read many books. I got maybe five or ten that I look at sometimes. I sure as hell don’t need a book to know when Ceasar takes too much of my labor for a fancy castle. I think books are a big problem. especially non-fiction.
      I think there needs to be about fifty categories for books, not two. And anything written by the British, should be legal to burn.

    • Chris, I wouldn’t put Carroll Quigley at the top of my reading list, either, as he was an apologist for the biggest crooks, at best. Quigley’s sources were government papers, cleansed and redacted. There are many criticisms of his work, including this one found in a wikipedia bio about Quigley: “Quigley argued that the Round Table groups were not World Government advocates but super-imperialists. He stated that they emphatically did not want the League of Nations to become a World Government. Yet Lionel Curtis, who, according to Quigley, was one of the leaders of the Round Table movement, wished for it to be a World government with teeth, writing articles with H. G. Wells urging this.[37] ” That article by HG Wells, published by The Atlantic in 1919, discusses his idea (a 3rd option) for what the League of Nations should be, and he promotes Germany’s involvement in it, of course. Jan 1919, The Atlantic, HG Wells, Chairman, “The Idea of a League of Nations”.

    • In Part III of his essay, HG Wells pushes his idea for a 3rd option for the League of Nations. Note his naivete, at best, about Germany’s intentions in 1919: “The affairs of the world are now in a posture which enables us to dismiss the idea of a world hegemony for Germany, or for any other single power, as a fantastic vanity. We have to consider, however, the much greater probability of a group of the more powerful states, including perhaps a chastened Germany, agreeing among themselves to organize and enforce peace in the world for ever. This would give us still a third type of league which we may call the League of the Senior States. It is perhaps the most probable of all the possibilities.”

    • David, very funny about imprinting. Yes, Imprinting can be bad. That’s why crane biologists wear crane suits when they raise endangered baby cranes.

Comments are closed.