Moscow is much more concerned over the US moves to try to get the EU jammed up on approving the second northern pipeline which has Germany in particular very angry over Trumps unconcern on the damage that inflicts on Germany.
Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>
The US Treasury has released its so-called ‘Kremlin Report’, a list of 210 Russian politicians, officials and businessmen who may be subject to new anti-Russian sanctions. Sputnik did some digging to get to the bottom of the dossier’s implications, and what prompted the Treasury to release it now.
On Monday, the Treasury published a declassified nine page document of 114 Russian politicians and officials and 96 Russian businessmen who may be subject to new restrictions.
The same day, the State Department announced that existing restrictions in the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act (CAATSA), the law pursuant to which the Treasury created its list, were sufficient, and that new restrictions were unnecessary for the moment. Moscow has slammed the document, describing its release as a “road to nowhere,” and warning that it may be an attempt to interfere Russia’s upcoming presidential elections.
Who’s on the List?
Given the high-profile names listed in the report, Moscow’s concerns come as no surprise. Among Russian government officials in the dossier are Prime Minister Dmity Medvedev, the entire cabinet of ministers, and representatives of the presidential administration, including presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov.
What’s more, the report includes Russian Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Voldin and Valentina Matvienko, Chair of the Federation Council, Russia’s Upper House of parliament.
Other senior officials in the list include Sergei Naryshkin, director of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service, special presidential representative Sergei Ivanov, Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev and his deputy Rashid Nurgaliyev, Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu, Chairman of the Russian General Staff Valery Gerasimov, military intelligence director Igor Korobov, Federal Protective Service Director Dmitri Kochnev, and Federal Security Service Director Alexander Bortnikov.
Curiously, the Treasury document even includes clearly non-military or intelligence-affiliated officials, including children’s rights commissioner Anna Kuznetsova, and Boris Titov, commissioner for entrepreneurs’ rights.
The list includes Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin, St. Petersburg Governor Georgy Poltavchenko, Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika, and Investigative Committee head Alexander Bastrykin.Ironically, Russian President Vladimir Putin was not included in the list, an omission he jokingly said made him “sad.”
On the business side of things, the list includes the heads of a series of major Russian state-owned companies, including Russian Railways, Aeroflot, the United Aircraft Corporation, and others.
The Treasury document includes a total of 96 major Russian businessmen, who it refers to as ‘oligarchs’. The report’s sole listed criteria for entry is a net worth of at least one billion dollars.
The list includes business leaders including Elena Baturina, Oleg Deripaska, Roman Abramovich, Vladimir Potanin, German Gref, Leonid Fedun, Sergei Galitsky, Alisher Usmanov, Vladimir Evtushenkov, Alexei Miller, Igor Sechin, Mikhail Fridman, Vladimir Lisin, Mikhail Gutseriev, Suleiman Kerimov, Andrei Kostin and Mikhail Prokhorov, and others.
In all, 18 of the officials and businessmen listed in the document are already subject to sanctions under other US sanctions programs.
CAATSA: Congressional Effort to Box In Trump and US Allies on Russia
The Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act, adopted in August 2017, faced objections from the White House long before President Trump signed it into law. Prior to signing on, Trump called the bill “significantly flawed” and complained that it included “a number of clearly unconstitutional provisions” encroaching “on the executive branch’s authority to negotiate.”
However, with the bill receiving overwhelming bipartisan support in the House (effectively disarming the president’s right to veto), Trump, eager to avoid claims of collusion with Moscow, signed the bill into law.
Through CAATSA, Congress effectively narrowed the freedom of maneuver not only for the president, but for Washington’s wayward European allies, calling for a softening of sanctions, as well.
Treasury Report Does Not Amount to New Sanctions…Yet
On Monday, US media reported that the Trump administration had briefed US lawmakers on the prospects of anti-Russian sanctions under CAATSA. The same day, the State Department released a statement noting that the existing measures employed under the sanctions law were working, and that there was no need for any further sanctions against Moscow at this time.
Ranking Senate Foreign Relations Committee member Ben Cardin has confirmed that the White House had provided lawmakers with a classified briefing on Russian defense and intelligence sector-related sanctions, as required under CAATSA.
Saying that he “appreciated” the “administration’s engagement with Congress on this issue,” Cardin stressed that he would continue to actively supervise the situation to try and “hamper” Russia’s ability to engage in trade.For now, observers say, Congress seems to want to know more about the wealth and sources of income of Russia’s elite than anything else.
According to the Atlantic Council, the Washington-based think tank which came up with the ‘Kremlin Report’ designation, that list consists of about 40-50 persons, which together with their families may rise to about 300 people in total.
In any case, the Treasury has insisted that its dossier is “not a sanctions list,” and that “the inclusion of individuals or entities…does not and in no way should be interpreted to impose sanctions on those individuals or entities.”
On the eve of the list’s publication, Daniel Fried, former assistant secretary of state and head of the State Department’s Russia sanctions office, said that the Treasury report’s key goal was to “name and shame” Russian “oligarchs,” and to send a message that “Putin’s aggression in terms of Russian interference in our elections will be very costly to them.”
Furthermore, according to Fried, given the Russian elite’s anxieties about being included in this list, the dossier is a “signal” to Russia’s political and business classes to ‘maintain a distance’ from the Russian president.
‘Game of Nerves’
According to some Russian observers, including Alexei Panich, a partner at the Herbert Smith Freehills global law firm, the Treasury dossier is an obvious attempt to pressure Russia’s elite into distancing itself from a Russian foreign policy which Washington finds unacceptable. The list, he noted, serves to create a certain tension which little else, including actual sanctions, could accomplish.
“When sanctions are applied, everything is clear: what is unacceptable, what isn’t. But when it’s unclear whether sanctions will follow or not, and if yes, what kind, a threat, an ambiguity emerges in the [affected] person’s position. And this was the purpose of creating such a list,” the lawyer explained.
Dmitry Peskov, president Putin’s press secretary, was more blunt, calling the so-called ‘Kremlin report’ an obvious attempt to influence Russia’s presidential elections: “We indeed believe that this is a direct and obvious attempt timed to coincide with the elections in order to influence them.
We do not agree with this and are convinced that there will be no influence,” he stressed.Sputnik has asked both the Treasury and the State departments to provide it with details on the dossier’s explicit purpose, commentary about the timing of its release, and what impact it may have on Russian-US relations. As of this writing, neither US government office has replied.
Headquartered in Moscow Russia, Sputnik is a news agency with offices around the world. Sputnik covers global political and economic news for an international audience. Launched in November 2014 by the Russian media group Rossiya Segodnya, Sputnik works in more than 30 languages including English, Spanish, French, German, Arabic, Chinese, and more.
*All posts on behalf of Sputnik News are made by Gordon Duff and Jim W. Dean
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming educated opinion. In addition, to get a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media, please read our Policies and Disclosures.
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT. About VT - Comment Policy
“Congress seems to want to know more about the wealth and sources of income of Russia’s elite than anything else”
If only congress was this concerned about the wealth and sources of income of America’s elite..
What right does the US have to place economic sanctions on foreign businessmen? So now anyone who stands in the way of the US quest for global domination can be barred from doing business? Why should Russia’s businessmen adhere to anything the US says? Tell the USG to go suck on a rat. The USG has been bullying and blackmailing everyone, so why doesn’t the whole world gang up on the USG and refuse to do any sort of business with them? I’m sure China will want to buy what a lot of people are selling and their purchases could replace any lost revenue from refusing to trade with the US. Maybe the world should show the USG that they need us a whole lot more than we need them.
“On the eve of the list’s publication, Daniel Fried, former assistant secretary of state and head of the State Department’s Russia sanctions office, said that the Treasury report’s key goal was to “name and shame” Russian “oligarchs,” and to send a message that “Putin’s aggression in terms of Russian interference in our elections will be very costly to them.”
Pfft, these fools have still not proven Russia interfered in US elections. It’s a conspiracy theory. What’s more is that it’s mr. Fried’s tribe who interferes in every US election. So pathetic
The video speaks of Russia’s “Golden hundred”…So what?
According to the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) report titled “Billionaire Bonanza 2017,” America’s 400 richest individuals have more total wealth than the nation’s bottom 64%.
The three richest American billionaires are wealthier than the bottom 50%. The bottom 1% of Americans have a negative net worth of $196 billion. The top 1% has a combined net worth of $33.4 trillion.”
USG hypocrisy is unrivalled by anyone
A published list of prominent Russian politicians and business moguls ?
I would much prefer that our USGov take care of the subterfuge sponsored by the owners of the MSM since prior to 2008, the Obama, Clinton, DNC, congressional subterfuge and treason within the DOJ and FBI.
The MSM contains the six huge companies that own 96% of world media, all major TV and radio networks, all newspaper chains, all major publishing companies and more recently appear to also control the internet. The owners of the MSM sponsor the Clinton Duo, alias B.H. Obama, the DNC and “dual citizens“ who reside in the US while pledging 1st allegiance to a foreign, territorial entity that is alleged to be affiliated with the “deep state“. Per tapnewswire.com, six-jewish-companies-control-96%-of-the-worlds-media. Their influence on the US Treasury also requires serious consideration.
Instead of a list of politicians and business moguls of Russia, a list of similar moguls who reside in the US, yet pledge 1st allegiance to a fraudulent, territorial entity might be more meaningful.
This a clear case of do unto others that which you claimed the others are doing unto you, even when they aren’t. This impish implacability makes the DC crowd with it’s think tanks look like goonish knuckle dragging throw backs and rejects. Hold on they are.
Comments are closed.