Shocker! Francis Avoids Websites Exposing Him For Heresy



Shocker! Francis Avoids Websites Exposing Him For Heresy
By: Eric Gajewski
Addendum by Fr. Kramer


Does it truly surprise any Catholic that Francis has recently stated that he avoids websites exposing him for heresy? Of course he does not want to face reality.

He is not interested in Truth nor Catholicism. No, rather he is interested in further progressing the New World Order’s One World Religion agenda.

Furthermore, he stated that he avoids websites like mine all in an effort to keep “mental sanity”. But the reality is that as each day passes more and more Catholics are literally questioning his mental sanity.

How can a true Pope teach what Francis teaches? And why are there still a good number trying to paint people like me as the bad guy when all I seek to do is to demonstrate what the Church really teaches by way of Her Infallible Magesterium.

Francis is progressing things at a rapid rate with no end in sight. Did not Pope St. Pius warn that these modernist’s were full of themselves (pride)?

Francis has put his own self “outside the Church” by way of his teachings. It is he who is resistant.

It is he who is a sodomite protector and Marxist defender (he has friends who are).
It is he who thinks Communists make the best “Christians”.
It is you who say that Vatican II is interpreting the gospel in a new way.
It is he who is on record as saying he might be the one to cause the formal schism!
It is he who thinks all you have to do is be baptized (no need to hold the Catholic Faith) in order to be “in the Church”.
It is you who think heretics and schismatics can shed their blood for Christ and be called a “saint”.
It is he who implies Faith is not necessary for salvation by telling the atheist just obey your conscience and everything is cool.

When will people realize that he is a false pope?

When will people just start ignoring him for he holds no jurisdiction over the Church?

It is his own fault if he doesn’t want to embrace what the Church has always taught not mine.


Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. How about his stance on possible beings from other planets. They would be also be accepted into the Church? Baptism? Holy communion? confirmation? Obviously a one size fits all church no matter what or who or where.

  2. The church has always taught that Catholicism should be a global religion. The budget for missionaries and establishment of buildings, and purchases of land far outweighs any for charity. The Catholic Church owns more land globally than any other private entity.
    While individual budgets are no longer transparent, one I viewed for St Agnes in NYC was 400,000 for grounds & maintenance for one year. That does not include improvements. Just maintenance. Out of the 4 million per year annual budget was 9,000 listed for charity.
    I believe this to be a fairly common example of the comparison between expenditures for buildings, grounds and maintenance per church, to charity.

    • The best way to create and maintain a global religion, is to have a set of choices that are linked and agree to a historical narrative that all agree on a common timeline and set of events. Historical revision is the first thing that would have to occur. So, Judaism and Catholicism combined to create the Judeo Christian historical narrative and later created and attached Islam to maintain the narrative through what would have looked to them as 3,000 years. Meanwhile the historical narrative even if discredited at university level scholarship, it would only be by a select few who specialize in the assessment. Now what we have is complicity maintained by omission by both Academic and Religious authority reinforced by job stability. The occasional scholar pints out the truth, but it doesn’t carry weight against the previously installed narrative taught every Sunday or Saturday. In turn, the employment of repetition into practices further reinforces the inability to question any narrative.

Comments are closed.