An estimated 77 million Americans have a debt that has been transferred to a private collection agency. Thousands have ended up in jail over debts as small as $28, with African-Americans and Hispanics the most affected.
The findings come from a new report by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) spanning 26 states and Puerto Rico, published on Wednesday. The practice violates many US state and federal laws, which prohibit the jailing of debtors.
In one case cited in the report, a disabled woman who wears a prosthetic leg was shackled by her waist and feet by two armed US marshals before being put in jail overnight.
“They had a warrant for my arrest and I asked them for what, he didn’t say what it was for. He said, ‘He’ll tell you later,’” said Tracie Mozie of Dickinson, Texas.
Law enforcement officials had entered Mozie’s bedroom to arrest her over a $1,500 federal student loan she took out in 1986 to pay for truck-driving school. The loan had mushroomed to $13,000 with interest and fees. Monzie was unable to pay because she is unemployed and lives on disability benefits.
The ACLU examined more than 1,000 cases in which civil court judges issued arrest warrants for debtors. In some instances the amounts were as small as $28. Letters were sent over bounced checks as low as $2, the ACLU found.
The report is the first ever to analyze the cooperation between courts and the private debt collection industry across the US, according to the ACLU. Private debt collectors use the criminal justice system to try to compel repayments, even when the debts are disputed or when the debtor cannot repay. More than 6,000 debt collection firms operate in the United States, collecting billions of dollars each year.
Following their arrest, debtors may remain in jail for several days until they can pay the bail. In some cases, the ACLU found some people were locked up for as long as two weeks.
This practice violates the many state and federal laws as well as international human rights standards that prohibit the jailing of debtors.
The report finds that the long-term consequences of arrests for both courts and people can be profound and scarring. Arrest warrants can be entered into background check databases which mean they can jeopardize future employment, housing applications, education, and access to security clearances.
In one case in Maryland, an elderly couple were jailed because they did not appear at a district court hearing for which they had never been served notice. Isaac, 83, and his wife Doris owed $2,342.76 to their homeowners’ association and $450 in attorney’s fees. They had never been served with notice of the hearing, which had itself been scheduled because they failed to appear at a post-judgment proceeding for which they also had never been served. While in detention, Isaac began vomiting blood and became non-responsive, according to the report.
While debtors’ prisons were outlawed by Congress almost two hundred years ago, in reality the practice seems to live on.
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming educated opinion. In addition, to get a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media, please read our Policies and Disclosures.
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT. About VT - Comment Policy
We the people need a RICO lawsuit against the FED. Seize ALL their ill gotten gains and lock the rat bastards up. Since the FED operates under an amendment that does not have the requisite number of states supporting it, what they have been doing since 1913 is unlawful and it certainly is a blatantly criminal organization.
Well said Peter.
The GoldFish Report No. 190 Country Roads w/ Winston Shrout: IRS Terror Organization
If that is all true you have my respect Johnny, if everyone whining about the New World Order and the Jews now had played the game the way we did starting in the nineties when they mailed credit cards out to everyone who had a paper trail of an income we wouldn’t be where we are now. Police State America would have ended right there and then. I got about a half dozen of the things with 2 thousand dollar limits. I laughed to myself thinking everyone wants to be a a loan shark, lets see how good they are at collecting. I maxed out everyone of them and have never paid back one thin dime, nor do I ever intend too. At the time I didn’t need the money either, i just figured it was my duty as an American, little did I know just how soft Americans had become, even by the early nineties…
The betrayel begins when you set your signature under a one-sided “contract” by the banks which generates your own money they lend you for interest. You will not find the signature of one banker to hold liable for this scam in this so called contract. And so they steal the fruits of your work.
proof your mortgage is paid in full by your signature
New World Order: Creation of The Venetian Black Nobility and Committee of 300
Well, Decagon is an interesting thing. Yale has been hiding things and I have been speaking of the decans for some years now. Financial timing and geopolitical strategic knowledge of the correlation between time and place is quintessential to secure management. Personal debt is without collateral. That is on the lender. If they can employ an enforcement outside the morality of the general public, then they will do it.
The world of Ivy League and the world of Ivy League oligarchy are two separate things. One has access to law enforcement and the other does not. Elect your judges wisely, and that certainly does not mean law degrees are required. In fact, it is probably best if your judges do not have law degrees. Or high school diplomas, but if you feel secure by that boot on your neck, knock yourself out.
Th outlawing of this practice is also recognized by the Geneva Convention. Collectors have been buying and selling debt cases greater than 20 years it’s big business. And when you move around they place a skip tracer on the case.Most times after a year or three they will settle a reduced price through deep discount. The judges however that run these court systems placing persons in jail with with no mercy should face a tribunal cause these actions are barbaric by nature should stop post haste.
There has to a way to disbar such judges from having anything to do with law or politics.
My student loan payment is put off by the lendor Saliie Mae, for economic reasons. These people probably did not consolidate their student loan at a reputable lendor. In the case of the disabled lady in the article, her social worker or relative could have easily had the paperwork signed by a doctor testifying to her disability and inability to work. That would be enough to discharge the loan. There is also an unemployment deferral. Unsurprisingly, her support system – which the State and County workers are supposed to provide – failed her miserably.
Other forms of debt are easier to deal with. The first step is to write a letter referring the collection agency back to the original lendor. Who may settle for a fraction of the original debt. The difference being what they would pay to the collection agency; upto 50%. If the debt has been sold, as with store credit cards, most of the debts are assigned on a blanket basis. They rarely have a real document showing that the specific debt has been assigned to them singly. Debtors should demand that proof of assignation/purchase. They will furnish a blanket assignation. Which is not good enough to demand payment. Next step is to engage a monthly-fee legal service to write a letter demanding money for failure to provide adequate documentation and for harrassment.
Comments are closed.