Iraqi lawmakers call on Baghdad to set timetable for withdrawal of foreign troops

1
955

… from Press TV, Tehran

Iraq now has well-trained security forces, having learned the hard way

[ Editor’s Note: We have been waiting to hear something from the Iraqis about their plans for continued US troops inside their country. That includes the usual smokescreen of training and advising, as if after the long ISIS war with huge losses the Iraqis can’t train their own people.

Why is it that only foreigners are deemed capable of training Iraq’s army, when it has tens of thousands of combat veterans, including the Popular Militias, who are now a new National Guard?

Often these “training operations” are profiling and recruiting spies in the home country’s military. If the US wants, it can bring candidates to the US for training, which is often done for the military technical services people for maintenance, and pilots, etc.

But Iraq has no need for the US to help train new recruits. As the Parliament says below, it is up to the government to decide how long US troops are needed; but they have sent a message that they don’t want an open-ended commitment that turns into the permanent situation the US military always prefers Jim W. Dean ]

Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>

– First published … March 01, 2018

The Iraqi parliament has demanded that the central government in Baghdad set a timeline for the withdrawal of foreign troops, led by those of the US, from the Arab country after their purported fight against the Daesh Takfiri terrorist group practically came to an end following the demise of the terror outfit two months ago.

“The Iraqi parliament expresses its gratitude to all countries which have supported Iraq in its fight against Daesh and calls for the government to draw up a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign troops,” the office of Iraqi Parliament Speaker Salim al-Jabouri said in a statement on Thursday.


Meanwhile, Husham al-Suhail, a ruling coalition legislator, said that after the resolution is passed, “It is up to the government to decide how long we need them here — one year, two years, it’s up to them.”

Daesh unleashed a campaign of death and destruction in Iraq in 2014, overrunning vast swathes of land in lightning attacks. Iraqi army soldiers and allied fighters launched operations to eliminate the terrorist group and retake lost territory.

Last December, Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi declared the end of the anti-Daesh campaign in the Arab country.

The US first deployed forces to Iraq in 2003 after it invaded the country under the banner of war on terror and to allegedly disarm Baghdad of weapons of mass destruction, two years after invading Afghanistan under the pretext of combating terror. The deployment was followed by rampant violence and chaos, which set the stage for the emergence of Daesh in mid-2014.

In October 2014, Washington forged a 74-country coalition of its allies in another mission to purportedly root out terrorists. The US-led coalition, however, was suspiciously slow in progress, while its airstrikes against purported terrorist positions led to heavy civilian casualties and damage to Iraqi infrastructure.

Early last month, the coalition announced it was “adjusting” its force levels in Iraq downward as it shifted away from combat operations following the Daesh expulsion from all Iraqi urban centers.

Brigadier General Jonathan Braga, the coalition’s director of operations, has already said that “an appropriate amount of capabilities” would be kept in the Arab country in addition to the troops needed to train, advise and equip the Iraqis.

Abadi had earlier said that US military forces, which number some 5,000, would not stay on in Iraq once Iraqi forces retook Daesh-held areas.

Following the collapse of the Takfiri outfit in Iraq and neighboring Syria, Daesh remnants have been flowing into Afghanistan and expanding their presence there under the nose of the US military and other foreign forces.

*


EDITORIAL DISCLOSURE
All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

1 COMMENT

Comments are closed.