Watch today’s False Flag Weekly News above. Click HERE for links to the stories we covered.
Why was it so important to prevent me from being heard on Portland’s KBOO community radio? I was going to be taking call-ins. Why not just call in and explain why I’m wrong?
The answer is simple: 9/11 is a debate they can’t win.
For seven years, my backers have been offering $1000 (raised to $2000 the second year and thereafter) to any University of Wisconsin teacher willing to debate me on 9/11. Thousands of professors, lecturers, and TAs could make $2000 in a couple of hours. All they have to do is try to defend the 9/11 Commission and NIST.
So why won’t they? Because they know, at some level, that they would be in the wrong: intellectually, morally, spiritually. They would lose. They would embarrass themselves and the University.
Likewise, no credentialed scientist has been willing to defend the NIST reports on what happened to the three World Trade Center skyscrapers. We just held the 5th annual 9/11 Physics Debate, whose winner — once again by default — was David Chandler of Scientists for 9/11 Truth.
Globally, more and more relatively mainstream analysts are speaking more and more truthfully about the 9/11 false flag. “Conspiracy theories are rife in Russia“—and, increasingly, everywhere else.
The opposite of a truther is a liar. And the liars are panicking. They are censoring the internet. They are teaching AI to find and purge thought criminals. They are making sure that if you watch a “conspiracy theory” video on youtube, Wikipedia pop-ups will offer you re-education — at a small fraction of the cost of sending you to re-education camp.
They are witch-hunting academicians, from media watchdog James Tracy to conservative Catholic John McAdams to indigenous people’s advocate Anthony Hall. They are sponsoring suspected SLAPP lawsuits against alternative media (though this may turn out to be a positive development, since truth sometimes has a way of seeping through the courtroom walls). And they are even imprisoning heretics simply for speaking their minds in a calm, factual, loving way.
And yet the true “conspiracy theories” (JFK, 9/11, Gladio, false flags, banksters, Zionism, NWO) are winning, while the Establishment’s idiotic fearmongering lies (which are also conspiracy theories) are losing. Hardly anybody really believes Russia is pointlessly poisoning people with “return to sender” toxins. Nobody is panicking about Russia supposedly hacking our power plants. Virtually nobody agrees with Trump and Pompeo that Iran is even a problem. Nobody really thinks Syria’s government, rather than its enemies, is behind the chemical weapons attacks. Hardly anyone accepts Bnai Brith’s fundraising claims that Jews are threatened by a surging worldwide army of “anti-Semites”—and more and more people, including even Donald Trump, pre-emptively suspect that high-profile attacks on Jewish targets are likely false flags. To top it off, despite Kim’s endless threats to nuke American cities, few Americans are worried about North Korea.
We stand at a very interesting and important point in history: the crossroads between truth and lies. If anything remotely resembling a free debate continues, the truth will continue to forge ahead.
[table id=FFWN /]
* NCT, north central Texas