NEO – Gibraltar – The Real Reason for Brexit finally revealed

12
4088

by Seth Ferris, … with New Eastern Outlook, Moscow

Will the battle continue?

[ Editor’s Note: Seth Ferris, in his usual way, takes a close look at an ongoing story that has been covered endlessly and finds a new twist in the puzzle, the status of Gibraltar post-Brexit.

I must admit I missed it, too, as how much leverage can 30,000 people have there. But it is not they, but the rock that may have the leverage, especially if Europe creates its own defense force.

And if US tariffs on the EU continue, as does sanctioning of EU trade partners – continually messing up its balance of payments planning with major trade partners – the EU might respond in ways the US might not like.

I don’t think Seth is proposing that the US needs to have a major base there, as there is little room, but that Britain could not use it as a carrot for other things, like certain kinds of US weapons platforms, etc.

All that said, Brexit got over a tough hurdle today with the agreement on a final date of December 31, 2020. The problem with the Irish border was not allowed to be a deal killer by postponing it – a wise move. Both sides needed to make the deal to encourage confidence with their constituents.

We will now see if the removal of the “Brexit uncertainty” will be acknowledge by the markets and business interests, which can always surprise usJim W. Dean ]

Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>

– First published … March 19, 2018


Once again the naked truth has shown itself while everyone was looking the other way. Analysts have been giving all sorts of reasons as to why the Brexit scenario has developed as it has. But the truth has been staring us in the face, all the time – which is exactly why these debates have been encouraged.

Whichever way they voted, British people are no longer primarily arguing about the EU itself. The issue is whether the consequences of leaving, which are becoming increasingly burdensome, are a price worth paying.

The pound has tanked and the promised quick fixes on immigration, employment and opportunity have not materialised. Problems no one ever expected have also arisen, such as the impact on the Irish border, the possible grounding of flights and significant employers in Brexit-voting areas threatening to relocate to the EU.

The Brexit camp have gone from crowing about their victory to telling everyone they will survive somehow, and worrying that the government might not deliver Brexit after all. The Remain supporters believe they are being proved right, gaining traction by presenting Brexit as a con imposed on the electorate by newspaper magnates and politicians wanting to protect themselves from tax demands.

But all of a sudden, the real reason Brexit is being pursued in the face of political logic has come out. The media owners may have facilitated Brexit, but it is another dimension of a familiar story. If we had understood this before, we might have seen who all those tax dodgers are really working for – and what the consequences will be for a rich, developed country which has sold itself into Third World-type slavery.

As bad as our friends

Great powers, whether countries or individuals, are always tempted to behave badly simply to show they are different. Absolute monarchs often had a succession of mistresses just to show they were special people, above the moral codes of ordinary mortals. Powerful nations do whatever they can get away with just to show they are part of the club, as the centuries of walking into other countries to create empires testified.

We have all seen how the same process works nowadays. The great powers exert control through military partnerships and energy dependence. If these methods don’t work, first propaganda and then brute force are used to force recalcitrant countries to obey their master’s will.

When it gets to that stage, there is no way out for those poor countries. All the “wars of liberation” we have experienced since World War Two have left their supposed beneficiaries even more dependent than before, with only the oppressors changing, if they even do.

So it is no surprise to now find that there was a military dimension to Brexit few had noticed. Brexit should not affect the UK’s membership of NATO or its network of operational agreements with other countries, as the Common European Defence Force is not yet a reality.

But it does change the status of Gibraltar, that isolated bit of rock which is a British Overseas Territory due to a long-forgotten dispute of little relevance today – and this presents both a problem and an opportunity for its notorious fairweather friend, the US, which it is now seeking to exploit.

Your future not ours

Gibraltarians were given a vote in the EU referendum, and 96% of them supported remaining a member. Only 823 voted to leave. But this is hardly surprising, given the abundant benefits EU membership has given this tiny enclave of around 30,000 people.

Though a strategic military location guarding the narrowest stretch of the Mediterranean, Gibraltar has prospered more from the open border with its former owner, Spain, than it ever did from being a prominent Royal Navy and Royal Air Force station.

The people may be famous for being “more English than the English”, but the local economy, and that of southern Spain, benefits greatly from the open border between the two. This is a situation the UK and Spain’s common EU membership made possible, as Spain, which joined the EU later, was only allowed to do so on condition the border was opened.

Madrid has never got over losing this rocky outcrop in 1704, during the War of Spanish Succession, the contemporary equivalent of the Yemen conflict. It still claims it as its own, and closed the border between the two in 1969 when Gibraltarians voted to remain under British rule.

The British invested further in the Rock’s military dimension, and promoted it as a tourist destination, but with military cutbacks and the rise of more exotic holiday destinations it faced an uncertain future. Only the reopening of the border, and the rise of online gaming, have given the locals a reason to have a more than sentimental attachment to the British state.

Brexit will close that border again. It will also give Spain 27 allies in its claim to sovereignty over the Rock. Spain is demanding that Gibraltar remains with the Customs Union if the UK does leave the EU, and is apparently winning that battle. As Gibraltarians support this step, this creates a division between the UK and Europe in which the British subjects on Gibraltar support the other side.

This is taking place against a backdrop of the US trying to reduce its commitment to NATO, despite its ongoing involvement in expensive foreign conflicts. Despite this, it has always objected to the creation of a European Defence Force controlled by Europe itself, more independently of the US. With Europe increasingly united and belligerent in the face of Brexit, contrary to expectations, this creates a military division between the US and EU which has not existed since the EU was founded.

So the US has to bypass the EU to retain military control of Gibraltar via an ally. Brexit achieves this, provided the UK can be brought on board.

With few other friends who prefer it to the EU, the UK is desperate to recreate its old “Special Relationship” with the US to try and limit the economic impact of its own decision, though with limited results. It will have little choice but to sell itself to the White House in the bleak world it is now offering its people, who are realising they can’t all be fooled, all of the time.

When the US takes control of a country it builds military bases there. The British still have a sizeable military presence on Gibraltar, but have scaled its back in recent years because the Rock’s strategic significance is more commercial, as the gateway to a major maritime trading route, than military. But now it is intending to establish a new base there, bigger and better than anything seen before, even as its trade declines as a result of leaving the EU.

Why? Who is the UK at war with? Who does the Gibraltar base protect the UK from? It is hard to see the answers to these questions until you substitute “US” for “UK”. Then the importance of Gibraltar looms as large as the Rock itself, as it would have done long before had we not been encouraged to look in other directions.

One boot on one foot

Gibraltar has gained a new military dimension thanks to US actions in Libya, Syria, Egypt and other countries with a Mediterranean coastline. The US, and particularly the Trump White House which has always supported Brexit, doesn’t want those pussies in Europe remaining in charge of it.

The biggest obstacle to creating a European Defence Force is the reasonable unwillingness of national parliaments to abandon their sovereignty over the troops they are sending to their deaths. They may support the idea of a European force in principle, but in practice they make it difficult to achieve by insisting on local control of decisions affecting their own citizens.

This is understandable, as fighting for your own country makes a lot more sense to potential recruits than fighting for somebody else’s, as the US itself found in a place called South Vietnam.

The US doesn’t have that problem. It doesn’t even have local control in practice – while presidents and congressmen come and go, the US military-industrial complex remains, with most of its senior personnel serving longer at their levels than any politician. It does pretty much what it wants, but for political reasons tries to present everything as “allied action”, a joint response to a crisis recognised by all “right thinking” nations.

If the EU can no longer be trusted to be right-thinking, or agree to support the unilateral actions of unaccountable US military or intelligence brass, the US has to have Gibraltar to keep the naval supply route going. It can’t do that if the UK, which owns it at the express request of the natives, is part of the EU.

Leaving the EU is causing the UK hardship which no politician wants to be held responsible for – even senior Brexiteers can see what is happening, despite their public blusterBut the British government is insisting it has to respect the “Will of the People”, even though those people never voted for the consequences they now see daily.

More than the monkeys we don’t give

Gibraltar might be considered an insignificant issue, a smaller piece of a much bigger puzzle. Until you look at the power relations between the US and UK. Who offers what to whom, exactly?

When the UK joined the EU in 1973 its Prime Minister, Edward Heath, specifically stated that it was doing so because the UK could no longer rely on its special relationship with its former colonies to ensure prosperity. As his government was later driven to introduce the notorious “Three Day Week”, in which a three day working week was effectively imposed to conserve energy, this idea resonated at the time.

However it also upset former empire nations such as New Zealand, whose own agricultural industry relied on this special relationship, as the UK is being reminded now it runs to these countries looking for trade deals and signing none.

The US, the great superpower, was one of these former colonies the UK could no longer rely on for its welfare. The UK was consciously preferring the EU to it. As long as the Western alliance was still a reality, this didn’t matter so much. Now it is increasingly a verbal construct that changes things dramatically.

The US doesn’t need anything from the UK it can’t make at home, in the industries Trump keeps saying he wants to revive, or get from other countries it takes more seriously. The UK desperately needs US patronage however, as leaving the EU will leave it with no trade deals at all, with anyone, for a period and few countries are interested in the UK on its own rather than a member of the EU. The only thing the UK does have is Gibraltar, and that is the one thing the US wants.

It would be politically impossible to tell the British public that the future of the UK now depends on letting the US effectively take over Gibraltar via its UK “partners”. But unless the UK can find other significant countries who prefer it to the EU, that is the reality.

The UK can’t survive at the back of the queue when its wage levels and social infrastructure are designed for a nation at the front. It’s giving the US what it wants or nothing, and that is a reality any future administrations in both countries will have to face.

Taking back control

British people are generally pro-American, and even more pro-Western. But the US-UK relationship has long been a source of irritation to many of them. The US claims to speak England’s language and gained all its institutions from the UK.

Yet the former colony now sets the international standard in everything, and its old masters don’t see why they should change their ways and standards to fit in with the US, even if non-English speaking countries are more willing to do so.

During the Iraq War there were frequent complaints that Tony Blair and George W. Bush, who was widely regarded in the UK as an embarrassment to the US, were working so closely together that Blair had his tongue lodged in a certain part of Bush’s anatomy.

US commentators often felt it was the other way round. But it was ultimately that perception which fueled public interest in how that war had started, and ultimately to the Chilcot Report, which effectively stated that Blair had misled parliament to involve the UK in a US scheme.

It will therefore be interesting to see what the declassified government papers tell us, 30 years from now, about who first raised the Gibraltar issue with whom, and how this related to the timeline of the EU Referendum and the Brexit campaign.

Particularly as this decision may make those government papers a historical relic, as the long-suspected US plan to make the UK its 51st state may be much nearer fruition by that time, in fact if not in name.

Seth Ferris, investigative journalist and political scientist, expert on Middle Eastern affairs, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

*


EDITORIAL DISCLOSURE
All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

12 COMMENTS

  1. Frankly I don’t know of any anglosaxon international political move not having a military dimension in the past few hundred years or so. After the Brexit vote I warned here that all the Brits are concerned about was the post brexit status of Gibraltar. Also why do you think NATO “headquarters” are set up in Brussels? Could it possibly be that Brussels is the closest European capital to London?

  2. The United States of America owes a government debt of about $21 trillion or 21 with twelve zeros.
    This is a vast sum of money for which there is no evidence it will ever be repaid. All government does is pay interest on this massive principal sum which itself is a large sum of money. This keeps interest rates low shafting senior citizens out of life savings. Obviously the United States is operating way beyond its means. The impending financial collapse could happen at any instant without warning. Almost anything could trigger the collapse. By ignoring this impending emergency Congress and President are violating the long rules of history. Collapses of the Spanish Empire, the British Empire and soon the American Empire. Just wait and watch and be prepared for a dramatic financial crash which will make 1929 look like a cake walk. The rock of Gibraltar will be the least concern of Americans who will lose everything. The inmates have taken over the asylum in America today and are ignoring the lessons of history.

    • And remember this bit of wisdom: “The bigger they are, the harder they fall”. Be prepared to wake up one morning and discover you bank accounts were looted by the federal government.

    • Yea, and remember this, ..by creating a population of poor, they are not nearly as affected by economic collapse. Nothing much changes for the poor when wine is no longer available by country and year.

    • I can’t say that I pray for the economic collapse, but , I can say that I do not fear it. It affects the rich a million times more than the poor. Go ahead make our day !

    • Khalid, we agree on Jubilee, I am a strong proponent of it, every 49 to 52 years, wipe everything clean. It prevents unhealthy accumulation and predatory collections. I see no indication US armed forces are interested in that sort of thing however.

  3. Ha ! , Are you really suggesting that US is the throttle for the British engine ? Ludicrous.
    Gibraltar may be something of a nice curio in a shop, but it is certainly not the tourist destination of the US to Britain.
    Britain is the instigator here, because by drawing us into the WW , and creating Israel, it shows its hand in the contract with the Vatican and profit sharing on the distribution of wealth from imperialism.
    I’ll tell you what, you keep Gibraltar and Brexit, and we kick you out of our affairs, and you deal with Israel and all the family problems it brings, K ?

    • btw, now that it’s out, Brexit cannot be blamed in any way on the US, and in fact, there is a better case the UK can be blamed for Trump. Cambridge Analytica is not a US or Russia company, slimy slithery sneaky little sneakers you. I see you there in the grass and stone. Go make something. Our labor is no longer your profit.

    • Well, Peter has some good points, but the US has a much larger number of British accents in our advisory and publicizing than I have heard in the past, and compared to the actual number of British in our general population it is enormous. Britain and Israel are a team, and as a team, they have much more influence over us than we do over them. The corporate Religious hierarchies seem to have the directing hand, and for the US, I cannot fathom that ours are the thinkers. We are the Brutus, forever jealous and chasing Olive Oil.
      Britain is simply a parent, dealing with the children she raised. A rowdy entitled lot. The backlash from the empire is not yet reached it’s conclusion. I won’t be me that underestimates the sly workings of the Royalty behind the scenes.

Comments are closed.