Carolyn Yeager’s defense of “anti-Semitism”: A critique

15
1981
Jeremy Rothe-Kushel embraces a prophetic, moral interpretation of Judaism. (Carolyn Yeager embraces misguided judeophobia.)

By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor

What’s left to say about “anti-Semitism”?

According to mainstream usage, “anti-Semitism” means “racially-tinged prejudice against Jews” or more succinctly “anti-Jewish racism.” It is held to be the most scandalous and reprehensible of prejudices. Today, it is said to be on the rise, the evil core of a supposedly neo-fascist current threatening Western civilization. The panic over “resurgent anti-Semitism” was sparked by last year’s series of more than 100 bomb threats to American Jewish institutions—which turned out to be a massive false flag operation ginned up by a young Israeli-American Jew named Michael Kadar, presumably under the direction  of his vicious, Islamophobic Shin Bet black ops specialist uncle and colleagues.* The Michael Kadar false flag op succeeded in forcing Amazon to ban dozens if not hundreds of history books, and led to an ongoing internet censorship crackdown on critics of Israel.

In fact, the 19th-century term “anti-Semitism” is incoherent and should be dropped in favor of “Judeophobia.” Today, virtually nobody hates Jews due to their spuriously “Semitic” racial heritage. We now know that there is no such thing as a “Semitic” race—there are only Semitic languages. (19th century Europeans confused race with language.) It is Arabs and Muslims who revere the Arabic-language Qur’an who are hated for their connection to a Semitic language—the main Semitic language on earth, the one used by more than 95% of all “Semites,” namely, Arabic.

So anti-Semitism has only one valid meaning today: Bigotry against Arabs and Muslims.

Carolyn Yeager’s recent article endorsing “anti-Semitism,” in the spurious sense of “Judeophobia,” stupidly accepts the misnomer, then goes on to offer a parade of errors and exaggerations, as well as some partial truths.

Let’s break it down to see where she goes wrong.

“THESE DAYS, WE REGULARLY SEE IN THE JEWISH NEWS MEDIA story after story proclaiming that ‘antisemitism is on the rise.” In Poland, in Germany, in Austria and Hungary, in British and US cities – the same phrase is repeated. And everywhere else, too. Will Jews never learn that the more they try to control what others think and say about them, the more antisemitism they create?”

When she writes “Jewish news media” Yeager obviously does not just mean the Forward and other “Jewish” publications. She is calling the whole mainstream media “the Jewish news media.” This is clearly an exaggeration. Yes, Jews are in fact greatly over-represented in the media and even more over-represented in Hollywood. But obviously the MSM are not 100% Jewish. Nor are all Jews in the media 100% in agreement with any Jewish “party line.” On the other hand, as Jewish journalist Philip Weiss points out, the vast majority of American Jews in media, who collectively do in fact “dominate” the media, are in fact strongly biased towards Israel, and even view their pro-Israel media spin as the last thing standing between the Zionist entity and its tragic destruction.

Likewise Yeager exaggerates by histrionically asking “Will Jews never learn…?” It sounds like she is saying that all Jews are trying to control what others think and say about them. In fact, a great many Jews, probably the majority, are not party to any such effort.  A few brave dissidents, like Gilad Atzmon, Henry Herskovitz, and my colleagues Jeremy-Rothe-Kushel and Jonathan Revusky, are courageous critics of tribal discourse-control by Jewish elites. On the other hand, it must be admitted that even many eminently humane and reasonable Jews, such as my esteemed colleague Rabbi Michael Lerner, have a blind spot when it comes to their ultra-sensitivity about what non-Jews say about Jews—listen to Rabbi Lerner put that ultra-sensitivity on display on my radio show:

This reveals the main flaw in the kind of thinking represented by Yeager: Taking the bad or fallible behavior of some members of a group and unreflectively using it to smear the entire group. We all are guilty of doing this, on some occasions and to some extent. But it is a form of sloppy thinking that leads to prejudice, i.e. “pre-judging” individuals based on their group membership. In the worst case scenario, this kind of prejudice can lead to violence and disaster.

Yeager’s article continues with an even more problematic paragraph:

“The current big push to ‘wipe out’ antisemitism is a phony issue being used by Jews to get more laws on the books to protect Jews from the consequences of their actions.”

Whose actions? Those of the majority of US Jews who have little or no connection to Israeli genocide, internet censorship, etc.? If Yeager means that the “anti-Semitism” scare is ginned up by people like Mordechai Kedar to protect ISRAEL from the consequences of its own genocidal actions, she should say so.

“It is a cynical campaign devised by high-level Jewish strategists to further their entry into places, perhaps previously partly closed off, where they can make money.”

WTF? How, precisely, are they going make money? Yes, the ADL, SPLC, PRI, and other censorship organizations do make vast sums of money by hyping “anti-Semitism.” But Yeager isn’t talking about that; she is saying something nonsensical instead:

“International or Diaspora Jewry became partial to bank notes (and their equivalent in precious metals, jewels, paintings, etc.), because they are easily transportable and able to be invested and/or held secretly and safely in many nations. It is important to Jews that these goods keep up a high value in our societies. (It’s not a coincidence that Jews are so overrepresented in the fine art world and stock brokering, for example.)”

So pray tell, Ms. Yeager, how Jews are going to increase the value of their banknotes, precious metals, jewels, paintings, etc. by hyping “anti-Semitism”? Obviously this paragraph makes no sense; it reflects emotional prejudice, not logic.

“Connected to that, Jewry has changed our Western social values from faith, family and homeland to gold, hedge funds and conspicuous consumption. Jews are more in control of our societies than most people are aware – in fact, most people have no idea at all of the high level of control Jews exercise over their lives.”

Again, while it is true that European Jews were overrepresented in the Enlightenment push to overthrow traditional Christian values and replace them with materialistic ones, Jewish participation in these historical movements was only one factor in their success. Others included fallout from the Wars of Religion, the effects of mass literacy unleashed by Gutenberg’s printing press, ideas presented by such non-Jews as Charles Darwin, and so on. And what precisely is this “high level of control Jews exercise over (our) lives”? Does Yeager mean that whatever is wrong with our lives must somehow be the fault of Jews? This represents a gross exaggeration (and sloppy thinking) at best, and an invitation to mindless and potentially vicious scapegoating of an entire community at worst.

“But when people do get wise, they become antisemites. And this is the other side of the campaign of the Jews against antisemitism – to keep you from realizing the reality of their power and influence over you. They famously present themselves as either friends or victims, every kind of victim imaginable.”

Yeager’s invitation to “anti-Semitism” (i.e. Judeophobia) is so exaggerated and paranoid that it reflects badly on those who raise questions about Zionism, Jewish supremacism, and the possible role of elite Jews in various historical misdeeds. While it is true that when people get wise to certain aspects of history (for example, by reading Laurent Guyénot’s magisterial From Yahweh to Zion) and speak out about them, they risk being called anti-Semitic. But real wisdom is antithetical to prejudice. A person who is truly wise to suppressed aspects of historical reality will never succumb to bigotry.

“The latest idea in Germany to fight antisemitism is to mandate visits to former WWII concentration camps which have been turned into tourist centers – visits by Muslim migrants who bring their antisemitic views with them from their home countries. Even though this won’t work with these people because they don’t have the ethnic background to care about what happened in Europe during WWII (or any time), the German government is willing to spend their German taxpayers’ money to keep the Jews satisfied that something is being done on their behalf. The Jews want to always see programs carried out for their benefit that cost the Gentiles money, even though they know as well as I do that these programs won’t change anything.”

Yeager has a point here: The German proposal for mandatory visits to concentration camps is absurd, and if implemented it will be ineffectual. But she is wrong to claim that Muslim immigrants are Judeophobic. Just because the Zionist thought police say so doesn’t make it true! Muslims are strongly anti-Zionist out of logic, not prejudice. There is absolutely no good reason why a “Jewish state” should be established and maintained in Occupied Palestine, and virtually every Muslim on earth knows it.

The claim that Muslims are Judeophobic because they often agree with such holocaust revisionists as Robert Faurisson, Roger Garaudy, etc. should be addressed by debunking the revisionists’ arguments, not forcibly dragging people to concentration camps! Currently there are no good single-volume debunkings of holocaust revisionism. The two leading efforts thus far, Shermer and Grobman’s Denying History and Deborah Lipstadt’s Denying the Holocaust, are unlikely to convince anyone trained in critical thinking; indeed, they often have the opposite of their intended effect. A decent book-length argument against holocaust revisionism, published in European languages as well as Arabic, Farsi, Turkish, Urdu, Indonesian, Malay, and other languages of the Muslim world, would solve the problem. Why hasn’t this been done?

Muslims are generally NOT prejudiced against Jews AS JEWS. Muslims and Jews have lived side-by-side for 1400 years with vastly fewer problems than Jews have experienced with other groups. It is only with the rise of Zionism, which perpetrated the unspeakable crime of invading, occupying, and committing genocide in a Holy Land that has been administered by Muslims almost since Islam began, that Muslims have come into large-scale conflict with Jews.

“Jews are also putting up elaborate new holocaust museums and centers in every city and town in the world, large and small. The latest I know about is a complex to be built in central Vienna, Austria, and another going up in a popular, peaceful park next to the Parliament in London. Why are they allowed to intrude on the landscape everywhere? Because Jews have money and friends and that equals power over the ruling establishments (which also have their share of Jewish members). Jews obviously do not care if they anger or upset the average man in the street, which means they actually do not care if they are disliked. They care about exercising power.”

Yeager’s disgust for the Holocaust Museum epidemic is understandable. She ought to have pointed out that these buildings are the sacred temples of a new religion, Holocaustianity. And she ought to have analyzed how this hideous new form of idolatry is driving mass murder and genocide all over the world, by reinforcing the myth of the “good war” and thereby legitimizing American military aggression against every “new Hitler”—thereby enabling the American Holocaust in which the US has murdered 55 million people since World War II as well as the Palestinian genocide.

“The only real fear Jews have is that there will be a popular uprising against them, which has happened many times in the past. Jews characterize these uprisings against them as unjust, as unwarranted persecution for no reason – in other words, they use guile to turn what is unacceptable in them and their actions within Gentile society into a blow and an accusation against that society. This is the meaning of the common saying: “The Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.” They have labeled the reaction against them as anti-human rights, anti-semitic, xenophobic, and now in current lingo, racist. Not so long ago (in my memory) everyone was ‘racist’; now that has been changed – by the Jewish lobby – to be seen as a personality defect serious enough to have one fired from one’s job, kicked out of a university, and even dragged in front of a court of law and sentenced to prison. Jews have been responsible for all the so-called international laws that impinge on the sovereignty of nations; in fact, Jews invented international law for that very purpose!”

Yeager has a point about the one-sidedness of mainstream interpretations of the historical conflicts between Jewish and non-Jewish communities. Obviously there are two sides to such stories, and we are only being allowed to hear one, at least in the mainstream world of media, publishing, politics, and academia. She also has a point when she argues that it is critics of Jewish power rather than Jews who are today’s real victims, “fired, kicked out of university, and even dragged in front of a court of law and sentenced to prison.” But blaming Jews for international law is absurd. On the contrary, the world’s worst violator of international law is Israel! Brave Jewish people like Richard Falk, who have done terrific work in the unfortunately under-appreciated field of international law and tried to apply international law in Occupied Palestine, are heroes, not villains.

“So I repeat, dislike of Jews has always existed and it is based on the behavior of Jews.”

This is just as one-sided and ahistorical as the mainstream notion that such conflicts have always been the fault of non-Jews. For a thoughtful and well-sourced analysis highlighting what is left out of mainstream accounts, read Guyénot’s From Yahweh to Zion.

“Their tendency toward arrogant or dismissive attitudes toward the concerns of non-Jews (which each and every Jew may not be fully cognizant of) is a turn-off. So is the criminality of Jews that is directed toward non-Jews, mainly in white-collar financial schemes, but also in many other more repulsive areas such as pornography and the sex trade.”

These issues are also dealt with in a balanced, factual way in Guyénot’s book.

“Finally, it is based on the way Jews look out for other Jews to the detriment of their host people, not only in business and professional advancement, but in their vaunted charity as well.”

While Jews didn’t invent tribal nepotism, some would say they have perfected it. Again, for a solid analysis of this aspect of Jewish culture, read Guyénot.

“Considering Jews’ attachment to their centuries-old religious and cultural programming that they are a special, chosen people (with corresponding special privileges), how could antisemitism ever be ended? I think that can only happen if they succeed in turning the rest of us into masochistic, self-hating, blubbering punching bags or else door mats.

“If antisemitism is our only defense, we would be not only fools but craven cowards to give it up.”

We don’t need prejudice or bigotry. What we need is defensible, well-sourced analysis of issues Yeagar raises that have any degree of truth or legitimacy (such as those found in Guyénot’s From Yahweh to Zion.)  Such analyses could foster a dialogue including both Jews and non-Jews that could help both groups change their cultural attitudes in ways that would end Judeophobia and the historical complexes that produced it.

*Richard Silverstein, “Israeli-U.S. Tug of War Over Teenager Accused of Terror Threat Campaign Against Jewish Institutions.”  April 23, 2017. https://www.richardsilverstein.com/2017/04/23/israeli-u-s-tug-war-teenager-accused-terror-threat-campaign-jewish-institutions/

“A reader here published a comment saying that he lived in Ashdod and knew the Kaydar family.  He adds that the suspect is a nephew of Mordechai Kedar, a leading trainer of Shabak agents.  Kedar teaches Arabic at Bar Ilan University and is one of the most vicious, Arabophobic academics in Israel.  I’ve written several posts about him.  The combination of Uncle Mordkhe the Arab hater with Nephew Michael the greedy nerd terrorist seems odd, to say the least.”

15 COMMENTS

  1. “A decent book-length argument against holocaust revisionism, published in European languages as well as Arabic, Farsi, Turkish, Urdu, Indonesian, Malay, and other languages of the Muslim world, would solve the problem. Why hasn’t this been done?” – KB

    The above implies that Kevin Barrett endorses the mainstream view of The Holocaust – was that the intent? There are enough contradictions, red flags (e.g. the keepers of The Holocaust dost protest too much over any questioning), and things that do not pass the smell test so that it does not take a bigoted person to be agnostic or doubtful on the subject.

  2. Note: There must have been a directive from the ADL, SPLC, or Mossad recently. It has become very rare to be called an antisemite online, starting a few months ago. Even on Breitbart Jerusalem, a beehive of Zionists, no matter how hard I try…

    “Taking the bad or fallible behavior of some members of a group and unreflectively using it to smear the entire group. We all are guilty of doing this, on some occasions and to some extent. But it is a form of sloppy thinking that leads to prejudice, i.e. “pre-judging” individuals based on their group membership.”

    If everyone would keep their opinions quiet during the learning process, and only communicate on issues like Talmudic Zionism when they have a full understanding, this wouldn’t be an issue. But that’s not realistic. People like Yeager MUST be allowed to pursue their enlightenment unmolested by thought police. The answer is to smash political correctness so we can get real, without fear of hurting feelings. It hinders accomplishment.

    “Does Yeager mean that whatever is wrong with our lives must somehow be the fault of Jews? This represents a gross exaggeration (and sloppy thinking) at best, and an invitation to mindless and potentially vicious scapegoating of an entire community at worst.”

    Yes, she should cite the plethora of examples to validate her assertions, and include the fact that powerless Jews ALSO fall victim to just about everything the goyim experience.

    • ““But when people do get wise, they become antisemites. And this is the other side of the campaign of the Jews against antisemitism – to keep you from realizing the reality of their power and influence over you. They famously present themselves as either friends or victims, every kind of victim imaginable…Yeager’s invitation to “anti-Semitism” (i.e. Judeophobia) is so exaggerated and paranoid that it reflects badly on those who raise questions about Zionism, Jewish supremacism, and the possible role of elite Jews in various historical misdeeds… A person who is truly wise to suppressed aspects of historical reality will never succumb to bigotry.”

      It’s not the goyim’s fault; Zionists keep the true history of the “Jews” hidden, deluded “Jews” are happy to support the lies, and once people learn MORE THAN 5% but LESS THAN 90% of Jewish History, they come off as Jew Haters.

      It is natural AND acceptable.

      So unless the hoarders of knowledge quit holding the truth captive, that’s NOT going to change, and too bad if this learning process hurts peoples feelings. Jews and everybody else better get used to it, you can’t unring a bell. Free speech is a pressure release valve for the oppressed. Take away non-violent expression, and you are leaving people with no alternative but violence. Not wise…

    • “The German proposal for mandatory visits to concentration camps is absurd, and if implemented it will be ineffectual.”

      At least they are acknowledging that being put through holohoax propaganda is a form of punishment. That’s a start.

      “There is absolutely no good reason why a “Jewish state” should be established and maintained in Occupied Palestine, and virtually every Muslim on earth knows it.”

      Muslims are not alone. There are many GOOD reasons why it should NOT. Israeli behavior, being the #1 issue.

      Excellent article by Dr. Barrett.

      He clearly has a more thorough foundation of knowledge on the subject than Yeager. I believe that once people like her learn enough, they will be able to more accurately view cause and effect, and pinpoint blame.

      I insist the path forward is open REASONABLE discussion rather than censorship of any kind, self-inflicted or otherwise.

      And whiny kvetching “Jews” should get used to it.

  3. A good critique, and very well thought out.
    I look at the mass conversion done by the Khazar, and from that tribe comes a pseudo-Jew, never having stepped foot in the Middle East, which morphed into Zionists, hell bent on twisting the book, so they could lay claim. I feel sorry that their identity has to be ingrained in just how Jewish (“entitled” / “chosen”) they are, otherwise, their paradigm might shatter. Tsk, tsk.
    I look at two elements of the mass converts. One being the Yiddish language which developed. It was a mash-up of other tongues, but clearly not Hebrew, or Deutsche, or any of the Slavic linguistics of which they were exposed. What developed is a little from Column A, a little from Column B – YIDDISH. How odd that while in Germany, the German Jew aka AshkeNAZI lived . . . over hundreds of years. No one told them not to develop their borders, or their language, or their culture. They spoke YIDDISH. They wrote YIDDISH . . . they set up their little Yiddish enclaves . . . for hundreds of years. Who told them NOT to speak Yiddish? Was in the Germans? Nope. It was their own Rabbis who wanted them to be HEBREW so badly, Yiddish was verboten turn of the 20th century. Odd, they never considered themselves HEBREW. They were “Germans” or “Poles” or “Russian” whatever else they were, and they spoke YIDDISH. That language wiped out, by whom? ראַבי

    • Anybody ever hear of the word: Shtetl?
      Yiddish: שטעטל‎
      Of course not, because that would mean that the world didn’t subject Jews to “ghettos,” but that they chose to set themselves apart. The pious of the bunch . . . not wanting to mix with non-Jews. It was not the other way around.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shtetl
      How could the AshkeNAZI have been “kicked out” in their diaspora when the majority of current inhabitants of Israhell can’t even trace DNA to the 8th Century middle east BCE.
      If a group of AshkeNAZIs can get “land” that they probably never even inhabited some 2,800 years ago, then I want to get my little piece of PRUSSIA that my family lost in WWII — that was paid for AND deeded to my Grandfather. Do you think Poland is going to give me back my family’s farm land? Oh, the humanity! Who can I go to kvetch about that?!?
      And last time I checked, the Romans sacked the Jerusalem Temple in 70 CE . . . had nothing to do with Arabs.

  4. First comment, “…the more ‘anti semitism’ they create”. Do you not realise that so-called ‘anti-Semitism’ is the Rabbis’/Sanhedrins’ Best Friend and Ally. Assimilation is their enemy. Ghettos are not prisons, they are fortresses. Ironically, the herded animals (read “Human Persons” by the definition of any sane thinking Human Person) are not The Goy but the adherents of Rabbinic Talmudism.

    • Second. If you read Douglas Reed “The Controversy of Zion”, apart from the fact that it is very informative, you will see that he and others were controlled from the Editorial Level. Their contributions were negated and substituted with more “suitable” writers , notice that I do not use the Professional term ‘Journalist’. We are talking about Jewish control of the Russian Bolshevik Revolution here, an event that changed Modern History and lack of that information distorts all historic understanding of recent history. Suppression of 9/11 information pales in comparison of importance compared to that earlier censorship. I was very reliably informed that the leading Auckland Main NZ City “News” Paper, “The NZ Herald” was monitered from overseas on a minute by minute basis for content and placement and the emails would come in all the time with instructions. Who appoints the Editors?

    • The “Faith” of the Judaeans hinges around the Talmud and not the Natural Mosaic Law. Levitical insertions and interpolations in books such as Deutronomy reinforce this. The Talmud is a Casuistic Catechism with regard to Natural Law and Logos, a denial in fact. The Kabbalah is a Theory of Emanation and involves the Enfolding/Unfolding Universe that makes no explanation of First Principle and therefore ipso fact is pure Atheism and Materialis. Hence the fixaion with materialism, sexuality etc. The World is god and The Tribe is god too, by that “definition”. Specifically, The Chosen People of Y–H who cannot be named because the Tribe is chosen by itself.

      Freemasonry is Talmud Lite and all the rituals are based on that. Christian Fundamentalis are “Justification by Faith Alone” Chosen People and essentially a Judeaising Sect, like all Protestants. They follow the Schofield Bible, which is a fraud and written by a criminal commissioned by wealthy Jews, published by Oxford University the home of the roundtable Movement. These guys have been plotted into existance to believe in Armageddon, Rapture and Jerusalem as World Capital. Essentially Brain Washed Vote Fodder, still heavily subsidised.

    • There is absolutely no doubt that this emphasis on materiality and “there is no basis for morality in rational thought” – cold hard Post “Enlightenment” thought that is, British Empericism with pleasure and pain and not Good and Evil. Owning the Central Banking System with Usury and with “love of money is the root of all evil”, along with advertising and encouraging shallow materialistic values, surely allows massive control of the Human Herd i.e. Human Parsons.

    • Isn’t good old Rupert Murdock a prime example for “international” journalism which greatly influences opinions, politics, wars and also decides on who is a good righteous man or a bad, bad terrorist? World domination has already been accomplished. Now it is time for “fine tuning” of the masses/herd into the right direction and towards their final destination.

  5. Many of these wounds, if that is the proper word, are self inflicted. They, the Jews, made the decision to create a country based on a religion. So, many actions of that country are intertwined with religion. It becomes impossible to criticize what may be political actions of the country without also mixing up arguments with their religion since many actions are “justified” by religious based myth and dogma. Because they tend to stick together, especially during a crisis, individuals may get blamed for the actions of a group. Look at the gross mistreatment of the Palestinians today by Israel. How many in Israel are speaking up against these atrocities? If they are not, it is their own fault for being blamed for them. Their often bigoted beliefs, based on biblical nonsense cause many of their own problems which they blame on others instead of themselves. The abridged Protocols of Zion published by Henry Ford about 1921 in his newspaper
    The Dearborn Independent did not just appear out of thin air. They were based on a mountain of evidence and facts developed over a long period time. Of course there are exceptions to any rule.
    These groups have certain very selfish and self centered attitudes, which extend to the group, which have brought them such a bad and frankly deserved bad reputation for a long period of time. Man’s inhumanity to man did not begin or end in WWII. How about the Armenian Holocaust of about 1.5 million in 1915 by the Turks? Israel does

    • Israel does not even acknowledge this. What they are doing is seeking to use the “ruse of religion” and the “anti-S” ruse, as a shield to prevent any legitimate criticism of their immoral and even illegal actions in many spheres, especially the current mistreatment of the Palestinians, the immoral and illegal possession of nukes, their failure to allow international inspections while hypocritically criticizing Iran, their daily land theft and building of illegal settlements and even the mountain of evidence and facts that they did 9/11/01 to the U.S. https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/Israel_did_it Again they seek to use the ruse of anti-S to shield them from legitimate criticism for many improper, immoral and illegal often very selfish and self centered actions totally against “The Golden Rule” which they, as a group, seem to be ignorant of. After all how can they expect others to respect them if they do not respect others? How would they, as a group, like to be treated the way they treat the Palestinians? How would they like to have their “9/11/01” done to them by the United States of America instead? They seem to be oblivious that other people actually have feelings and moral rules of right and wrong too, not just them. Evidently all they learned from Nazi, Germany is how to copy them.

    • You have failed to consider a century and more of Britains subversion against her rivals. All you know about belongs to a later era when Britains plans had taken on a life of their own. Thus your logic is sound but doesnt touch the crucial parts of the sequence of events which led to the era with which you are familiar.
      Houston Chamberlain too came in at the later stage but still is totally blanked out from historical accounts of both revisionists and court historians. Goebbels called him the pathbreaker and visionary of nazism. Realize that you along with most of the grassroots have been misled. The jews were to remain a British asset only. Thus they had to be weaponized against all Britains rivals. Beginning shortly after Napoleon from a much sounder motive planned to bring the jews to the ME. Napoleon was inspired by the philosopher scientist G W Leibniz and the intention was to develop Egypt, not just exploit. Napoleon assumed the jews would be able to contribute in a positive way. Later French politicians had related constructive ideas about development of southern areas but again Britain stood in the way. The jews were played against Germany to prevent banking from moving its center of mass away from Britain. Likewise playing them against Russia made sense from the perspective of Britains Deep state.

Comments are closed.