Gazprom says ready to start major gas projects in Iran

6
1888

… from Press TV, Tehran

Are we entering a phase of “Sanctions Roulette”?

[ Editor’s Note: We are seeing a model develop here where US sanctions combined with Western countries compromised by the threat of loss of their US business could end up leaving a lot of future development business in the hands of the New Silk Road block.

I am sure that will just be fine with them. But that will push US Uni-polarism to its natural conclusion, that “not controlling everything and and everyone” is a national security risk, which gives it permission to use the military to correct.

This is no more than a mafia thuggery kind of thinking, but one we see being accepted as the norm here in the US, as evidenced by the astounding silence we are getting from America’s institutions who were once wary of such a dangerous trend of “might justifies right”. 

Which way the EU goes will be key. It wants to have a foot in both camps. And worst of all, the spitting on international agreements by the US now begs the question of what is the point of making an agreement with the US?

How can anyone bank long term on the US honoring its commitments when it has established a new international economic term, “pulling a Trump”, on any deal a new administration chooses to bail out of, like repaying the Deep State for putting them in the presidency?

Will we see presidential candidates running on what agreements they would break if elected? Why is there no pitched debate going on now over this in itself being a major national security threat?

This all seems to me to be taking chaos theory from the its past realm of being a roller coaster ride, to a permanent state. Who could possibly be interested in such a thing? The only party I see is the Deep State.

And if reality clearly establishes it as the obvious national security threat to everybody, how long is it going to take the rest of us to move against it while we still have time. And whose side will the rank and file military people come down on, the major religious institutions, and academia? Wondering minds, like mine, worry Jim W. Dean ]

Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>

All of these energy developments and be quickly destroyed in a Persion Gulf war, with huge economic consequences worldwide

– First published … June 17, 2018

Russia’s energy giant Gazprom says it is moving closer to an ambitious scheme that envisages the development of several Iranian gas projects, including one that involves a state-of-the art technology to liquefy natural gas for exports to overseas markets. 

Russia’s media quoted Vitaly Markelov, Gazprom’s deputy chairman, as saying that documents for the development of the projects would be soon prepared and later presented to the National Iranian Oil Company (NIOC).

Markelov said the projects included the development of Kish, Farzad-A, Farzad-B gas fields as well as one in South Pars energy hub.

Kish is believed to be one of Iran’s biggest gas fields with an estimated 1.3 trillion cubic meters of natural gas in situ and more than 500 million barrels of gas condensate.  It is located around 30 kilometers east of Lavan Island in the Persian Gulf.

Farzad-A and Farzad-B are twin projects which are also located in the Persian Gulf and are jointly shared with Saudi Arabia. Farzad-A is largely located in Saudi waters and there is no exact estimate on its reserves.

Farzad-B has a reserve of around 22 trillion cubic feet (tcf) of which about 60 percent is recoverable. Iran had been negotiating the project’s development with India over the past years.  However, discussions never led to a deal over differences on pricing and other technicalities.

Both fields were discovered by an Indian consortium back in 2008.

 

“We will negotiate with the Iranian party [NIOC] over the projects and will announce our decision after analyzing Iran’s terms and conditions,” he was quoted as saying by Russia-2 television news channel during a press conference in Moscow.

The official further emphasized that Gazprom would also study the development of a major gas to liquid (LNG) scheme in southern Iran – named Iran LNG.

He said the development of Iran LNG had been halted but a series of major facilities for production of electricity had been installed.

“Gazprom will need to study the technical aspect of this project and will decide over whether to take it up or not after its analysis of the project would end,” Markelov said.  

Last November, Gazprom said it had signed a basic agreement with the NIOC to develop an LNG project in Iran.

The company announced in a statement that the agreement was part of a wider plan for cooperation that focuses on the development of Iran’s gas fields “with subsequent transportation and monetization”.

Production of LNG requires a technology heavily patented by American companies. That technology cannot thus be provided to the Islamic Republic due to sanctions by the US against the country.

Foreign companies are also banned from developing any LNG project on Iran’s soil due to the same sanctions.  The country had previously devised three liquefaction projects – Pars LNG, Persian LNG and NIOC/Iran LNG – but had to shelve them after investors – Total and Shell – refused to push them forward as a result of sanctions.

Iran LNG – which the country plans to develop in Pars Special Energy Economic Zone (PSEEZ) where its huge South Pars gas field is located – comprises an annual output of 10.4 million tonnes of LNG. Other products would include 263 million tonnes of Propane, 194 million tonnes of Bhutan, 213 million tonnes of gas liquids and 133 million tonnes of sulphur.

Biography
Managing Editor
Jim W. Dean is Managing Editor of Veterans Today involved in operations, development, and writing, plus an active schedule of TV and radio interviews. Read Full Complete Bio >>>

Jim W. Dean Archives 2009-2014
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

6 COMMENTS

  1. MOA – do you even know why Gaddafi was executed? It wasn`t because he was a tyrant! I`ve done the research so let`s see what you know.

    • Of course he was a tyrant, a brutal and cruel one put in place by the CIA in 1969 so that Libya could be used as a base for black ops in Europe and a training centre for terrorists.

    • Ian I differ from Your views , in my opinion CIA might have brought Gaddafi to power but he was no pawn later , Already the Libyan people miss his generous sharing of the national oil wealth …. During Gaddafi’s time the Libyan govt started sharing the wealth by grants , stipends and what not , I mean there was even an allocation IF You were getting Married …. Gaddafi was an eccentric with loads of Nationalism but His Nation was African , Gaddafi did his best to be nice to his mama Africa , He Identified Himself as African and Never as Muslim or Arab … In gaddafi’s murder scenario it is interesting to note that the French Leaders campaign fund was secretly paid for by gaddafi to curry favor and yet the French turned on gaddafi because gaddafi was going to introduce a new African Gold Backed currency of the Gold Dinars ….. Gaddafi might have had minor faults but his era is already missed by the Libyans who miss the Peace and Properity of the Gaddafi era ……. Actually Gaddafi was murdered because hew was no pawn to the west ….. in some speeches he even spoke out about 9/11 being false flag operation …… My two cents ….. BTW Libyans Miss Gaddafi & most Iraqi’s miss the Saddam era because since the western overthrow of these nations there is No Peace , No Security & the replacement govt is a ripoff …. Thank You Europe ……

    • It’s not a case of views but rather of facts and the facts are plain – Gadaffi was a CIA puppet from day one right up until the end, he ran Libya with an iron fist and only those who were part of his ruling tribal group enjoyed anything resembling a normal life, for everyone else, it was not so rosy. The Gold Dinar, as well as his pronouncements about 9/11 were just a part of the smokescreen of propaganda to hide the fact that Libya was nothing more than a CIA exclave where they could host black sites, warehouse illegal arms, transship drugs, train terrorists, all manner of black and illegal ops.

    • I guess I forgot to mention that it was gaddafi’s govt the launched and ran the ” greatest man made river ” pipeline to bring water from far away locations ,, it was a water pipeline that too was destroyed during this ” revolution ” , imagine that people have way less water too ….

Comments are closed.