Angela Merkel’s government is on the brink of collapse – and we should all worry about what might happen then

Germany is in no position to 'lead' Europe, and has little desire to. That is bad news for everyone

5
1239

__________
The Guardian
Angela Merkel’s government is on the brink of collapse – and we should all worry about what might happen then

To borrow a phrase, when Germany catches a cold, Europe gets pneumonia, and right now the political situation in Berlin is looking distinctly peaky.

If Angela Merkel’s rickety government does collapse – whether or not it’s in the orderly fashion ordained by the federal republic’s constitution – everyone in Europe should be very afraid of what life after “Mutti” would be like.

You could argue she’s had it coming, ever since her brave and principled decision to allow around a million asylum seekers, including from the war in Syria, into Germany. It was no matter that Germany was weak, divided, and with a succession of wobbly governments based on a kaleidoscope of shifting allegiances, as well as a growing parliamentary presence for parties on the extreme right… (I hope I am not being too alarmist).

We should remember too that Germany remains the continent’s only economic and industrial power of truly global stature. It is a great force for good, but perhaps we have taken its benign stability for granted for too long.

If Merkel does go, and out of some bitter arguments comes a stronger AFD, a noxiously nationalistic party, three things will inevitably flow.

First, an unwillingness to honour what she has been able to achieve in the way of a European “deal” on migration. That, in effect, is what a fresh election would be a referendum on.

Second, a refusal, frankly backed by the financial impossibility, to bail out Italy. That country’s banks and the state itself are virtually insolvent. Now, in a country itself seized by the far right, the Italians are threatening to print their own version of the euro – mini Italian treasury bonds with a face value as low as 10 euros that can be used as legal tender and to fund bank accounts – a clear dodge to evade European central bank disciplines.

Italy is the third largest economy in the Eurozone, to prop it up is beyond the means even of the Germans, and even if they wanted to – which they don’t. Sooner or later, Italy will leave the euro because Italy is too big to save (unlike little Greece), and because Italy has a government, and is a country, full of people who actually wish that to happen. It could bring the entire single currency down with it.

Third, there will be a generally more sceptical German attitude to further European integration along the lines advocated by President Macron of France, and, thus, a weakening of the spine of the European Union, the Paris-Berlin axis. The European Union, probably with the calculating connivance of the French (Macron too needs to watch his political flank), the ready assistance of the east Europeans, Dutch, Austrians and Scandinavians – and to the ecstatic delight of the Italians – would be moving towards a looser, less cohesive force. If and when that happens, freedom of movement will be ditched, and the Schengen Agreement on free borders would see fundamental reform. Brexit would be a sideshow compared to a Eurosceptic Germany.


The irony would be that a reform of the EU to suit British tastes would be arriving at just the moment the UK would be heading out of the door.

It is sometimes reported that the threat by the leader of the Christian Social Union (CSU) party and interior minister Horst Seehofer to resign from the Merkel government is a routine bit of argy-bargy between coalition partners, like the rows Nick Clegg and David Cameron used to have very occasionally. This crisis is, however, much more than that, and more important and potentially seismic than just the fall of the Merkel government and the end of the chancellor’s long political career, momentous as that would be.

For the CSU is the “sister” party of Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union (CDU), which in fact understates the sibling bond. They are more like twins, if not conjoined twins. The CSU, though technically separate, has, for most of the period of its existence since the Second World War, acted as a sort of regional variant of the CDU, operating in Bavaria, whereas the CDU operates elsewhere in Germany. They have always worked in close concert at the federal level.

The CSU hasn’t managed to win the federal chancellorship, but it has put candidates up on behalf of the CDU-CSU “union”, and always provided political heavyweights to CDU-CSU administrations. The two wings of German Christian Democracy have usually agreed, broadly, on the notion of a “social market economy”, though the CSU is more culturally “Catholic” and socially conservative (it has been stressing this lately), and represents what is one of the wealthiest regions of Germany, or the world for that matter.

It is also true that Bavaria has been on the “front line” during the migration crisis and the flow of people from the south. The rich Bavarians – whose area is home to BMW, Audi, Infineon and Puma, as well as some fine breweries – resent paying vast sums to rescue places like Greece. Bavarian regional interests are diverging more markedly from federal German ones. Hence the schism.

This is all part of a fracturing of Germany’s party system, with Greens, Free Democrats or FDP (nowadays a roughly Thatcherite group and socially liberal) and former Communists (“the Left”) finding representation in a Bundestag once monopolised by the CDU/CSU and the Social Democrats, with the FDP providing a handy and usually cooperative coalition partner for one or the other. The German electoral system was not designed for such a crowded field as today’s, and it is showing the strain of the resulting paralysis. Germany is in no position to “lead” Europe, and has little desire to. That is bad.

What is happening in Germany has been happening across Europe for years, masked by the victory of Emmanuel Macron in France and Angela Merkel hanging on to power in Germany. The far right, or populist right, or neo-Nazi right, or conservative right, or fruitcake right, in varying national flavours, are in government, either alone or in coalition, in Slovenia (the latest), Austria, Italy, Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic and Bulgaria. They are too close for comfort to the levers of power in the Netherlands, Denmark, Finland and France; they are slowly pushing up their support in Germany and Sweden. Only in Slovakia do they seem to have been beaten back. In Greece and Spain, it is the populist far-left who have taken the best advantage of the atmosphere of crisis.

All across Europe, then, social democracy has been dying a slow and pitiful death. Now Christian democracy – what the British would recognise as moderate conservatism – is suffering the same fate.

Too many conservatives see their easiest path to power in forming accommodations and coalitions with the far right, rather than centrist groups of “grand coalitions” with social democrats. It is a frightening trend, and one in which Brexit, the Conservative-DUP deal and the rise of Corbynism are the British counterparts to the wider story.

With America disengaging from European defence, an expansionist and aggressive Russia, trade wars and a floundering European “project” – and most of all a politically powerless and introverted Germany – the 2020s promise to be stormy years for our continent. The clouds are gathering, if we dare to look.


EDITORIAL DISCLOSURE
All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

5 COMMENTS

  1. That Illuminatti sign throwing hag has a date with the Devil.
    I suppose I’ll leave it at that

  2. When Merkel will finally resign, a sigh of relief will go to the country and most of Europe. A significant part of the population are demanding her resignation for more than two years. She is seen as the worst Chancellor in German history by inviting and taking in 1.400 000 refugees without any controls at the border. One got the impression, she is working on the extinction of the German nation and her culture. Her heritage will be a nightmare for many years to come.

  3. You talk a lot of crap sometimes. Merkel was never in the Stasi and trying to claim that weird Gotthard tunnel opening ceremony somehow indicates she is a satan worshipper is plain stupid, the tunnel is in Switzerland, not germany and Merkel had nothing to do with the ceremony, she was one of several European leaders who were passengers on the first train through the tunnel.

  4. Capitalism contains and breeds, an unsustainable momentum. There is neither supply nor demand to sustain it in perpetuity. But, there are those who will do all sorts of drastic things to keep it going.
    We will see the inner truth of humanity when this is tested, in conjunction with the internet effect which should be in an unknown state of maturity by 2022. Then 2023 will define , our ability to reconcile, and creatively adapt as a species, or see our propensity to administer domination greed, and untruth as a acceptable mechanism for the species and planet. Aside from our economics, it is our reluctance to face uncomfortable truth, that holds us back and causes many problems. Comfort is nice, but comes with a price. The game of pretend faces a struggle.

  5. “The German electoral system was not designed for such a crowded field as today’s, and it is showing the strain of the resulting paralysis.”

    This is not a simple slip of the tongue, but here the author talks about his idea of “designed democracy”.

    Later he descibes the CDU as a “moderate conservative party”. Please think of it, taking into account their real politics over the last 13 years. As is the SPD (Social Democrats) noadays, the CDU/CSU fullfilled any wishes of NEO-Conservatives to the point, thereby always be totally submissive to the slightest change of interest on the side of its masters (and the is not only one).

    The author will of course never speak about a 30 year long project of divisive policy, dividing the people using any trick of the book to make them defenseless and obedient to their corporate rulers. These are the major causes of the democratic race to the bottom.

    In addition, the last years have diminished our right in such a drastic way – a sorrily mostly still supported by the majority, if we believe our polls – that now there is practically no free speech. Our judicial system is borrowed from Hitler, evidenced by the fact that a “Staatsanwalt” totally depends on local or state officials (since 1933 – what a coincidence).

    We don’t have Mashall Law yet – as in France – but this might only be a matter of time.

Comments are closed.