Zionist Inquisition in full cry

Their quarry: anti-racist Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn. Their weapons: anti-semitism smears. Their purpose: to oust Corbyn and replace him with a compliant pro-Israel stooge.

20
2908
TARGETED: JEREMY CORBYN, ANTI-RACIST ISRAEL CRITIC.

The row over anti-Semitism has erupted yet again in the UK Labour Party, as predicted a few months ago by Miko Peled, the Israeli general’s son, who warned that “they are going to pull all the stops, they are going to smear, they are going to try anything they can to stop Corbyn…. the reason anti-Semitism is used is because they [the Israelis] have no argument….”

So Israel’s pimps at Westminster, never happy unless they’re telling everyone what to think and say, are frantically insisting that the Labour Party adopts the discredited International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of anti-Semitism in its unedited entirety and incorporates it into the party’s code of conduct. Many party members believe they have blown up the matter out of all proportion simply to settle their long-standing score – as Peled says – with the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, a genuine anti-racist, champion of Palestinian rights and critic of Israel.

This is what the IHRA definiition says:

“Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.”

It includes these eleven “contemporary examples of anti-semitism”:

  • Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
  • Making mendacious, dehumanising, demonising, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
  • Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
  • Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust).
  • Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
  • Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
  • Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
  • Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
  • Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterise Israel or Israelis.
  • Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.
  • Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.

Jewish community leaders are furious that Labour’s ruling body, the National Executive Committee, disagrees with 4 of these examples and refuses to include them in the party’s new code of conduct. The NEC, of course, is mindful that the code must be enforceable across half-a-million members with differing opinions, many of whom are tired of the constant whining. An emergency motion orchestrated by the Jewish lobby, forcing the NEC to take on board the whole IHRA package with all its examples and humiliating Corbyn in the process, was supposed to be considered yesterday but is now postponed till September.

The NEC explains its omissions by saying accusations of dual nationality are wrong rather than anti-semitic. It strikes out altogether the idea that calling the state of Israel “a racist endeavour” is anti-semitic, no doubt for the simple reason that it is racist. Israelis have for decades practised apartheid, casting their non-Jewish population as second-class citizens, and now it’s enshrined in their new nationality laws, in black and white. What’s more, Israel’s illegal occupation has denied Palestinians their right to self-determination for the last 70 years. The NEC also chooses not to forbid the use of symbols and images associated with classic anti-semitism and comparing Israeli policy to that of the Nazis unless there’s evidence of anti-semitic intent.

Sounds reasonable, you might think. But 68 rabbis have accused the Labour leadership of acting “in the most insulting and arrogant way” by leaving out or modifying those controversial bits. In a letter to The Guardian they say it’s not the Labour Party’s place to re-write it.

The arrogance is theirs, I think. Here’s why. The House of Commons Home Affairs Select Committee recommended adoption of the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism subject to the inclusion of two caveats:
(1) It is not antisemitic to criticise the Government of Israel, without additional evidence to suggest antisemitic intent.
(2) It is not antisemitic to hold the Israeli Government to the same standards as other liberal democracies, or to take a particular interest in the Israeli Government’s policies or actions, without additional evidence to suggest antisemitic intent.

The Government agreed but dropped the caveats saying they weren’t necessary. Subsequently the IHRA definition has run into big trouble, being condemned by leading law experts as “too vague to be useful” and because conduct contrary to the IHRA definition is not necessarily illegal. They warn that public bodies are under no obligation to adopt or use it and, if they do, they must interpret it in a way that’s consistent with their statutory obligations and with the European Convention on Human Rights, which provides for freedom of expression and freedom of assembly.

IHRA definition of anti-Semitism is deeply flawed

Crucially, freedom of expression applies not only to information or ideas that are favourably received or regarded as inoffensive, but also to those that “offend, shock or disturb the State or any sector of the population” – unless they encourage violence, hatred or intolerance. Calling Israel an apartheid state or advocating BDS against Israel cannot properly be characterized as anti-Semitic. Furthermore, any public authority seeking to apply the IHRA definition to prohibit or punish such activities “would be acting unlawfully”.

The right of free expression is now part of UK domestic law by virtue of the Human Rights Act. Furthermore the 1986 Education Act established an individual right of free expression in all higher education institutions. Then there’s Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which bestows on everyone “the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers”. As always, such rights are subject to limitations required by law and respect for the rights of others.


So the IHRA definition is a minefield. It’s not something a sane organisation would incorporate into its Code of Conduct – certainly not as it stands. It contravenes human rights and freedom of expression. But when did the crackpots in the Israel lobby ever care about other people’s rights?

The whole fuss borders on the farcical when you ask what anti-Semitism means. Who are the Semites anyway? Everyone avoids this question like the plague. Why? It’s embarrassing. DNA research shows that most of those living today who claim to be Jews are not descended from the ancient Israelites at all and the Palestinians have more Israelite blood. So they are the real Semites. Research by Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, published by the Oxford University Press in 2012 on behalf of the Society of Molecular Biology and Evolution, found that the Khazarian Hypothesis is scientifically correct, meaning that most Jews are Khazars. The Khazarians converted to Talmudic Judaism in the 8th Century and were never in ancient Israel.

Probably no more than 2% of Jews in Israel are actually Israelites. So even if you believe the propaganda myth that God gave the land to the Israelites, He certainly didn’t give it to Netanyahu, Lieberman and the other East European thugs who rule the apartheid state.

As former Israeli Director of Military Intelligence, Yehoshafat Harkabi wrote: “It would be a tragic irony if the Jewish state, which was intended to solve the problem of anti-Semitism, was to become a factor in the rise of anti-Semitism. Israelis must be aware that the price of their misconduct is paid not only by them but also Jews throughout the world.”

Well, that tragic irony has come to pass. As has been suggested before, so-called anti-Semitism is a matter best resolved by the Jewish ‘family’ itself. There’s no reason to bother Corbyn or the Labour Party with it.

Stuart Littlewood
24 July 2018

20 COMMENTS

  1. Wow! You said something no one else is willing to say!
    Imagine the cognitive dissonance living in a world where DNA testing locks people up and sentences them to death but when it tells us the people in Jerusalem are frauds, no one wants to say anything.
    Americans use the words Jew and Hebrew interchangeably yet they are entirely different words with different meanings.
    A Hebrew is a person who is genetically related to Abraham and is identified with a genome wide enough to “Father” many nationalities. White, Black, Red, & Yellow. The only group on the planet with a genome wide enough to accomplish that task is a tiny tribe of Africans and yet not all Blacks come from that tribe.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/5299351/African-tribe-populated-rest-of-the-world.html
    In the passage where it is stated that God loved Israel above all others, that word “love” comes from the ancient Chaldean language and means to Germinate, i.e. “seed the planet’, i.e., “out of Africa”.
    Who is going to tell the Evangelicals?
    According to the “New Testament”, anyone can be a Jew as this is a spiritual term so the joke is on us. The Israelis have never called themselves Hebrews, just Jews. Whose fault is it that we fell for their word play? I guess JFK was right and the world does owe Hitler an apology as he was right all along, they are not Hebrews.

  2. I read that some Rabbis in Sydney Australia had been fined up to $50,000 for Contempt of Court. Basically they were trying to force an individual to submit to a Rabbinical Court, rather than the Secular Justice System. These Rabbinical Courts also have an Historical record of applying Capital Punishment. This proves that there is a parallel “judicial” system (a Kangaroo Court?) and would seem to reinforce the case that there is a divided loyalty between the official nationality and loyalty to Israel or the Jewish “Religion”, which in its Rabbinical Pharisaic Babylonian Talmudic form seems to resemble nothing less than an Elaborate Criminal Code, engineered against wider society.

  3. I agree with Atzmon’s definition – an Antisemite™ is a person the Zionists do not like.

  4. The author forgot to mention many evils performed by the so-called “Israelis”, one of them being the abduction of the Yemenite children:

    2017 — Knesset Inquiry Reveals Yemenite Babies Murdered in Medical Experiments
    https://www.richardsilverstein.com/2017/06/15/knesset-inquiry-reveals-yemenite-babies-murdered-medical-experiments-abducted-parents-exploited-paid-national-institutes-health-experiments/

    2017 — Exposed: Medical experiments on missing Yemenite children
    http://www.israelhayom.com/2017/07/10/exposed-medical-experiments-on-missing-yemenite-children/

  5. I learned a new concept today: Sumptuary Laws
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sumptuary_law

    All I’ve got to say is, thank God for Ross, dress for less.

    13th – 15th Centuries sumptuary laws were common. Relating to clothing, food, furniture, moral and religious in nature.

    Here’s a good link to what was going on with Jews and their sumptuary laws: http://www.yivoencyclopedia.org/article.aspx/Sumptuary_Legislation

    “The leaders of the Poznań community were also concerned, in 1699, about the wearing of luxurious fabrics such as silk and the use of gold and silver embroidery. The leaders explained that these constituted an unnecessary provocation for gentiles, and also served as a means—by concealing liquid assets—of evading communal taxes and other payments.”

    Anywho . . . I tried to find this type of law for the human aspects, not just forbidding wearing gold/silver embroidery to raise the eyebrow of the gentile, but for things, such as . . . taking a commonly used word, oh, like SEMITE, and putting their stank on it.

    They are so inbred with their law, laws and more laws . . . they have now conditioned the “gentiles” to accept what they are saying . . . God forbid we should raise a collective gentile eyebrow by them usurping the word SEMITE, eradicating ARABS from being associated with that word.

    THEY are the TRUE ANTI-SEMITES. Wishing Semite Arabs away to the corn fields, I see.

    • In the quoted sentence above, their leaders (aka Rabbis) dictated. So even if they lived in a province in Poland, they didn’t listen to the Polish leaders, refused to assimilate, had their own laws, hated all the goy, lived in self-segregated communities, because they didn’t want to mix. They can’t have it both ways. They can pride themselves on setting up their own “separate, but equal” communities . . . then blame their host countries for all their ills?!?

      This “anti-Semite” crap is Rule #1 . . . playing both ends against the middle.
      Only they can be Semite . . . and only they can be anti-Semite.

      They ARE anti-Semitic by definition. By double-speaking, the word ARAB is being systematically removed from their boo hoo anti-Semite card.

      They mention not one word of ARAB in their “anti-Semite” sumptuary laws of the 21st century.

      14,500,000 Jews worldwide
      480,000,000 Arabs worldwide

      (Over 1.85 Billion Muslims worldwide, which include the ARAB SEMITES)

      So, there’s 14.5 Million Jews, who are NOT Semite in origin, or DNA proved by science, they never stepped a camel toe in the middle east until the last century and over 480 Million Arabs . . . and the world allows these pissant Jews to get away with re-defining the word: “SEMITE”!?!?!?!?

      They can discriminate against 480 Million Arabs, SEMITE by definition, by writing their cutesy 11 rules. Who the fvck do they think they are?!? Martin Luther?

      They are not SEMITES . . . the Zionists protest too much, me thinks.

  6. Another great commentary, Stuey, I am to understand that the Labor friends of israel constitute 80% of the party, or is that the Tories? Realistically, what chance does Corbyn have, especially with Ms Hodge in the wings.

  7. Odd how the Zionists have manipulated the paradigm.Zionists are racist white guys but if you point that out,you’re the racist.

    • Not only that . . . but they usurped the entire SEMITE definition. Where is there any mention at all of the . . . ARABS in their “anti-Semite” made up crap?

      OMIGOSH these Zionists are delusional.

  8. A Netanyahu balloon ,… same baby, different face, and with a Giant pacifier jammed in his mouth with the word anti-semitism on it. Good test for your Mayor and the state of free speech.

    • I hope folks are paying attention, to the trillion dollar industry known as religion, because they are advancing backwards in unison and sticking together, and working together, because it is with good knowledge and belief, that they know historical correction is coming, and it will be difficult for them to survive in their current state of comfort. They knew this, since the day the internet went live.

  9. Here at Toronto Street News tabloid since 1999 we have suffered four major arson attacks that burned out three separate homes of our staff plus my own car being blown up. Repeated attempts to knock me off at high speed on the highway with the same red Mini with white top also occurred. Simply because we print facts in our paper that has garnered a huge zionist wave of smears and hate directed toward us. We are at torontostnews.com — we are also smeared by the hate group at the Southern Poverty Law Centre. Whatever happened to the peaceful left? It has become a group of hate-mongers and warmongers. I left that area of politics a long time ago.

  10. Some Jews in Israel seek to use “religion”, and their alleged beliefs in it, as a shield and weapon to prevent criticism of them by others for commission of common crimes like murder, land theft, trespassing and terrorism. Many other Jews, who may not be directly committing such crimes, are aiding and abetting those who do. Therefore all are directly or indirectly responsible as the late Henry Ford observed nearly a century ago. Anti semitism is nothing but a ruse or con to allow these crooks to commit crime on a vast world scale. They created this fake religious shield to fool others and the world. What religion encourages murder and land theft and trespassing?

    • http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/intern_jew.htm
      THE INTERNATIONAL JEW,
      THE WORLD’S FOREMOST PROBLEM
      Abridged from the original as published by the world renowned industrial leader,
      HENRY FORD, SR.

      Appearing originally in the periodical published by the Ford Motor Co.
      “The Dearborn Independent.”
      https://www.shutterstock.com/video/clip-4294304-stock-footage–s-the-funeral-of-henry-ford-in.html Look at this very long line of people, on a cold winter day in Detroit in 1947, waiting to say good bye to the single man who did so much to improve their lives. Henry Ford was a genius with little formal education born on a Farm in Michigan in 1863. Pray for more Henry Ford’s to come along and save America from the selfish thieves he sought to expose in his great newspaper the Dearborn Independent.

    • Many Jews are masters at deception and fooling people. This is well documented. They did 9/11/01 on the United States but sought to blame it on innocent Muslims a dastardly criminal act:
      https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/Israel_did_it
      Quote:
      • “Larry Silverstein – is a Jewish American businessman from New York. Silverstein obtained a 99 year lease on the entire world trade center complex on 24 July, 2001. [3] The towers were in fact close to worthless, being filled with asbestos, [4] yet Silverstein “felt a compelling urge to own them”. Silverstein had breakfast in “Windows on the World” restaurant (located in North Tower 107th Floor) every morning. [5] but broke this routine on the morning of 11 September 2001. Silverstein’s two children, who also worked in the WTC, were also absent from work that day. Larry Silverstein was paid a little over $4.5 Billion in insurance money as a result of the destruction of the WTC complex. [6] Silverstein was on personal friendship terms with Zionist media-magnate Rupert Murdoch, former Israeli president Ariel Sharon, as well as Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu. Silverstein was such good friends with Netanyahu that, according to the Israeli newspaper Haaretz he would speak with him on the phone every sunday. [7]
      • Video – Where was Larry Silverstein on 9/11?”

    • Motto of Israeli Mossad “By way of deception thou shalt do war”. The word deception even appears in the Motto of the greatest terrorist criminal organization of gangsters in the world the Israeli Mossad. So deception is part and parcel of their Modus Operandi isn’t it? They offensively kill Palestinians but claim it is “defense”. They illegally attack and kill innocent Syrians but claim it is “defense”. This is a form of lying, cheating and deception which they are masters of. These are the masters of the deception and hi jacked the whores in Congress and the United States Government. They will take us back to the dark ages if the fools of the world don’t wake up and do something to stop it. Religion is the scourge of mankind.

  11. Yes indeed, the Sayanim have been activated to remove Corbyn, who supports human rights and the Palestinians, as leader of the Labour Party. For any public figure to state this fact would mean being hauled before a shyster of a judge and having their career destroyed. Welcome to the Zionist controlled U.K.

    • Well said Phillip. Stuart has written a wonderful article here that I hope is read by as many British people as possible.

Comments are closed.