VT predicted this purge would happen

VT is no stranger to internet censorship, where it came long after the corporate media black out running a decade now


It’s not a ‘defense’ of Alex Jones to argue that we’re on a slippery slope of internet censorship

…from Danielle Ryan, via Russia Today, Moscow

The old version has been replaced with a more sophisticated one

[ Editor’s Note: The original inventors of fake news, governments and their Intel agencies, are doing exactly what we predicted they would do when media began leaking material on the secret marriage between Google and the social media giants and various government intelligence agencies.

It was a no brainer that the Intel agencies were having wet dreams over the constant monitoring opportunities that would be available via “free” social media platforms that would only use their customers’ communication for “advertising” purposes. It was a simple con, too simple.

VT was surprised it took this long for most to figure it out. Everybody in the Intel world knew, and many in the military, but not the numbskulls down the line that were being monitored by their own. Not much hope for humanity there.

But the social media monitoring scam is just the tip of the iceberg. Guess who led the way on influencing elections all over the planet? Yep…the Intel agencies. Why? Because they view it as their job; but they avoid explaining to us whom they are really working for.

Founding Fathers get maced instead of being spit on

The con of “defending the people” is pretty threadbare. There should be a thousand whistleblowers from inside the machine by now, but there are just a handful. For those pretending to defend us while subverting us, admitting the act is the last thing they will do.

So now we see them do the expected “pulling a 180 on them” tactic by counter-accusing those who accuse them of fake news, and to ban those from public access. Watch how few, if any, free-speech proponents or well-funded organizations jump into the fight.

You know who they are. Have we heard from them lately? No. They are keeping their heads down. They want whatever funding they are getting to continue. The internet bannings going on now are a high tech version of an ISIS public beheading, an act of terror.

Yes, I said it first. The intent is the same, to scare people into being submissive servants. And what we are seeing is that most are meekly accepting the role. Danielle Ryan is not among them.

As for Alex Jones, we got into his shorts tracing back where his real money came from, which was certainly not the phony cancer cures, but the Bronfman family in Canada, very close to that little country in the Mideast. In the old-time Intel biz, we used to call this “hiding in plain sight”, like the Congresscritters who have sold out do.Jim W. Dean ]

Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>

– First published … August 08, 2018

The celebration on the Left at the quick-fire purge of Alex Jones and InfoWars from social media has been disturbing — not because Jones’ views deserve to be defended, but because his banning is a warning shot against dissent.

It’s important to note at the outset that I have no love for Jones whatsoever — lest this be read as some kind of endorsement or defense of InfoWars. It is not.

When you hound the parents of dead children and promote the theory that inter-dimensional “lizard people” are secretly running the world, you relinquish the right to be taken seriously by a lot of people.

But this is not about Alex Jones or what he believes. It is about the fact that the Left has willfully decided that massive corporations, working hand-in-glove with government agencies, as we know they do, should be the arbiters of truth and should hold the power to decide what we see, hear, read and believe.

Glenn Greenwald


Aside from the utterly obnoxious & disingenuous equating of censorship opposition with “defending Alex Jones,” this faith that Mark Zuckerberg, Google execs & their friends will faithfully and benevolently decide what is “hate speech” is just laughable https://theintercept.com/2017/08/29/in-europe-hate-speech-laws-are-often-used-to-suppress-and-punish-left-wing-viewpoints/ 

David Doel@daviddoel

Lefties defending Alex Jones right now: I hear you, on the surface it appears to set bad precedent to give massive corporations control over who’s silenced. But if you aren’t performing hate speech, libel or slander on a regular basis, then I don’t know what you’re worried about.

Normalizing censorship

Just a few days before the Jones ban, journalist Matt Taibbi wrote a piece in Rolling Stone about the slippery slope of Facebook censorship. These corporations, he said, have their hands on what is “essentially a direct lever” over nationwide news distribution. “It’s hard to understate the potential mischief that lurks behind this union of Internet platforms and would-be government censors,” he wrote.

Make no mistake: The US government has the power to exert massive, indirect control over speech and political discourse through social networks — and anyone who argues that Alex Jones is some kind of special case, obviously has not been paying attention. Jones is simply an easy target — a good, high-profile test case, so to speak.

But the rush to stamp out or ridicule dissenting voices goes far beyond extremists like Jones. To understand how ingrained the distaste for any kind of dissent has become in American political discourse, consider the fact that, this week, actress Alyssa Milano suggested that people who voted for the Green Party in a special election in Ohio were actually part of a Russian meddling campaign.

There was no other legitimate reason to vote Green, she said. Remember, conspiracy theories are just fine if the targets are deemed acceptable by the establishment.

This neo-McCarthyism has been steadily creeping back into the mainstream for years, but gathered steam with the election of Donald Trump and the onset of Russiagate, which has gripped American political discourse now for the better part of two years. Once-skeptical “liberals” are suddenly in thrall to the benevolent “intelligence community” and are more than happy to brand as a traitor to America anyone who questions its power and innate goodness.

Slowly but surely this kind of toxic and Orwellian political climate numbs people. Suddenly, calling Green voters Russian agents becomes normal. Daring to question the conclusions of the CIA becomes anti-American. Calling for the wholesale banning of figures you don’t like from internet platforms inexplicably becomes a defense of Democracy and free speech — rather than an attack on it.

This is the beginning of the normalization of internet censorship.

Plans afoot

It is no conspiracy theory to say there are plans afoot for further censorship of the platforms from where two-thirds of Americans get their news on a daily basis.

After news broke of the Jones ban, Democratic Senator Chris Murphy tweeted that InfoWars was “the tip of a giant iceberg of hate and lies” using sites like Facebook to “tear our nation apart” and called on tech companies to “do more” than take down one website. It was so important, he said, that Democracy’s very “survival” depended on it.

That tweet should be terrifying to the left, but somehow, it isn’t. Somehow, we’re at a place where normal, reasonable people arguing against censorship are the ones being branded as fascists and lunatics.

Responding to Murphy’s tweet, journalist Abby Martin issued a reminder that a 2017 report released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence said her show on RT had sowed “radical discontent” for covering issues like fracking, police brutality and social inequality. This gets to the crux of the issue. It’s not a case of ‘if’ the government might start branding perfectly reasonable dissent and debate as radical and dangerous — it has already happened.

Abby Martin


Considering the DNI report said my show sowed “radical discontent” for covering issues like inequality, fracking & police brutality, I’m excited to see what these politicians & tech billionaires conclude is dangerous information tearing apart the fabric of our very stable society

Chris Murphy


Infowars is the tip of a giant iceberg of hate and lies that uses sites like Facebook and YouTube to tear our nation apart. These companies must do more than take down one website. The survival of our democracy depends on it.

But it wasn’t just Murphy waxing lyrical on Twitter about saving American democracy. There are reportedly actual plans being circulated in Congress for further censorship and regulation of the internet.

leaked memo drafted by Democratic Senator Mark Warner lists a number of proposals for government intervention online, including forcing platforms to verify identities and locations of accounts, to do more to determine which accounts are “inauthentic” and to “label” bot accounts in some way. Perhaps most hilariously, it also suggests a government-funded initiative for teaching “media literacy” to children from an early age.

Who decides?

Those cheering Jones’ collective banning at the hands of all-powerful digital overlords should ask themselves a few questions.

Do you really want tech giants, working with governments, to be the ones deciding what constitutes “fake” news? Who gets to decide what a conspiracy theory is? Who gets to decide when something is“real” journalism or when it sows “radical discontent” and “division”and should be banned or labelled as dangerous and divisive hate speech?

To suggest that the “slippery slope” argument doesn’t hold water and that Alex Jones is a unique case is to be blind to reality.

After the Jones ban, journalist Glenn Greenwald wrote on Twitter that anyone “gullible, obsequious and subservient enough to trust Facebook” to determine what constitutes “hate speech” should travel to the West Bank and Gaza.

Last year, after Israel threatened Facebook, representatives from the social media giant met with the Israeli government to decide which Palestinian accounts it should shut down — and since then, as Greenwald reported in the Intercept, Facebook has gone on a “censorship rampage” against Palestinian activists.

Twitter has gotten in on the censorship action, too. The platform has recently been taken to task by Vice News for “shadowbanning” conservative lawmakers on Facebook — not deleting their accounts, but making them harder to find and their tweets less prominent in their followers’ timelines.

Noble efforts

Some on the progressive left have opposed this creeping censorship, cognizant of the fact that it leads to nowhere healthy, but others have cheered along, perhaps under the naive and totally false assumption that only the right-wing will feel the sting.

Well, they shouldn’t feel so comfortable. Google has already been accused of censoring left-wing and socialist websites. Sites like Alternet, Democracy Now and Counterpunch all experienced huge drops in traffic since Google changed its algorithms to combat “fake news” online.

READ MORE: Journalists covering Russian influence on social media not bothered by US government online psyops

The most ironic part is that all of this is framed as some kind of noble effort to protect Democracy and truth – and, disturbingly, people are buying into the idea that the government (and the corporations they wield massive control over) are best placed to determine which websites are peddling propaganda, which pundits are manipulating us and what information counts as disinformation.

Regardless of anyone’s views on Alex Jones, we should all be concerned about the precedent his banning sets for online censorship. There’s already more than enough evidence to suggest that he wasn’t the first and won’t be the last casualty.

Danielle Ryan
Danielle Ryan is an Irish freelance journalist. Having lived and worked in the US, Germany and Russia, she is currently based in Budapest, Hungary. Her work has been featured by Salon, The Nation, Rethinking Russia, Russia Direct, teleSUR, The BRICS Post and others. Follow her on Twitter @DanielleRyanJ, check out her Facebook page, or visit her website: danielle-ryan.com
SOURCERussia Today

Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. Alex Jones doesn’t keep male strippers. Many day me and my friend went to stripclub and one day a male stripper jumped at the stage. He performed the helicopter. My friend asked me, did we come to the right Place and he maybe he was also worried about my orientation. I said no worry, money has only one orientation, so it’s all the same if the stripper was female or male, the money is away from us.

  2. Jeff does a lot of fine work, he’s one of the very few good guys left. Thanks for letting us know they are pulling them off youtube, I’ll let Jeff and Gordon know. As you can imagine with Gordon and I, just about everything we talk about is a ‘hot button’ topic for those who run things, they really fear the truth and we serve it up on the most dangerous subject areas, so we are bound to be targeted for censorship.

  3. Facebook has become a monopoly. The reason we cannot allow monopoly is that too much power gets centralized. In the case of Zuckerberg, Bezos, Gates and a few others, they could meet and set national policy without being elected. They are doing it now.
    We need to get all Ida Tarbell up in here, right quick, or say hello to Dystopia, created by bezerko wealthy inexperienced uneducated experimenters, having fun on the weekends with the future of millions.
    It is a simple concept to plan 7 generations ahead.
    I have a new simple question. Why does Catholicism support Capitalism with such vigor ?

    • The so-called “capitalism” is, in fact, the financial usury based capitalism. It was invented in the early modern age by the predatory and truly satanic Jew bankers. The market economy and free enterprise have been with us since Man learned to count, manufacture and trade. By the way, the Jews also invented nazism.

  4. The 9/11/01 attack will be 17 years and counting next month. Space does not permit an adequate discussion of all the evil crimes and violations of our Constitution our own government foisted on us as a result of this criminal act by Israel, aided by traitors Bush, Cheney and the four star generals. How about the evil criminal monster “Homeland Security” and daily thousands or hundreds of thousands of unconstitutional searches and seizures of U.S. Citizens in blatant violation of the 4th Amendment to the Bill of Rights, while the whores in Congress, many of whom are dual citizens with Israel look the other way? It is only going to get worse unless and until someone does something about it. This means YOU. Yes a few parts of the so called “Patriot Act” have been thrown out but how about all of it? We citizens must demand the same standards for government as government has for us lowly citizens. If they want to change the Constitution they MUST follow the legal rules for doing so, not use these illegal back door outlaw methods as the 9/11/01 fear scam was. Citizens must get tough with government lest we lose everything to these criminals from Israel who have hi jacked it. This is serious stuff which goes way beyond censorship of the Sandy Hook Hoax scam where nobody died at all.

    • Amendment 4
      “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”
      Quoted from “U.S. Constitution for Everyone” by Mort Gerberg, A Perigee Book, 1987, page 40.
      So far as I am concerned every letter of every word in our U.S. Constitution has fundamental importance. This Amendment of the Bill of Rights must be one of the absolute most significant of all. This is a basic freedom we all take for granted, but which the traitorous whores and dual citizens of Israel in our Congress, have obliterated with the creation of the so called Homeland Security Police Monster, which gang rapes this dictum every minute of every hour of every day in almost every airport in the country with impunity and gross disrespect for every American Citizen’s fundamental rights in the above profound statement. In addition to placing hands of airport thugs in private groin or other private areas of the body, they are exposing people to untold amounts of dangerous, unknown amounts, and cancer causing radiation all in gross patent violation of the rules and law set out above, defended by the blood of untold U.S. soldiers for over 200 years. This is a shameful disgrace to put it mildly. This is an obscenity.

    • This is an obscenity.
      Watch this moving video of former U.S. Marine Ken O’Keefe relate his opinion about all this. Warning: He uses strong but very appropriate language for these despicable crooks engaged in these Constitutional crimes against all Americans every day. The events he describes happened at LAX in 2016. Nothing has changed today either. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqPofDjY0og

Comments are closed.