…from Russia Today, Moscow
[ Editor’s Note: The world is learning a hard lesson after having gotten sucked into the US being the benevolent nanny when it came to running the international financial structure. Neither the UN nor anyone else is nowhere to be seen in proposing to put such critical functions under international control to avoid what havoc one head of state would be able to impact.
In the US, there was no real public discussion for such a momentous act, where Congress was left out – but because it was Republican-owned, went along for the ride.
Some of the justification for the Trump sanctions are nonsensical, such as claiming that Germany’s buying a lot of gas from Russia was making it a captive. The EU had over $100-billion trade surplus with Russia; one it could conveniently afford because it had energy sales to them of a similar amount.
This was a win-win situation, one that was as good as it gets. Of course we all know the US energy companies got into Trump’s shorts with their desire to sell more expensive LNG to the EU, something that made no economic sense to the EU at all. Hence, he had to suggest it under a much broader plan to “recalibrate” economic relations.
There are certainly areas where the US has been unfairly treated, but there were mechanisms in place to deal with those, other than a sanctions war. But sanctions were chosen for the guaranteed turbulence they would cause in the market, and for the fortunes that the big hedge fund operators, who are major political donors now, could make.
This is the kind of thing you could expect to see from having a president get into office who viewed it as a license to steal. And a great price is going to be paid by hundreds of millions of world citizens whose governments sleep-walked right onto the train tracks to get run over … Jim W. Dean ]
– First published … August 27, 2018 –
“We can’t rely on the superpower of the United States,” German Chancellor Angela Merkel told reporters last month
“The US is more than the White House,” German Foreign Minister Heiko Maas tweeted on Sunday in response to US President Donald Trump, who has unleashed a trade war on the EU and had repeatedly blasted the German government over various policy issues.
Maas added that he hopes the upcoming ‘German Year in the US’ promotional campaign will help to “recalibrate the transatlantic partnership in a sober, critical and self-critical way.”
The ‘German Year in the US’ campaign (Deutschlandjahr USA) was designed by the government to showcase the friendship between the two states and to present a favorable image of Germany to the American public.
Speaking on Friday, Maas said that Berlin needs “a new and balanced partnership with the US.” The German minister cited “a growing protectionism” by its major transatlantic partner as a key reason for this requirement.
Berlin needs “to adjust” its policies given the new reality, Maas noted. However, he stopped short of saying it works against Washington, claiming the move would serve the best interests of both nations and insisting that the EU should become more active in areas where Washington “pulls back.”
Trump often singled out Germany when criticizing the EU on a wide range of policies. He lambasted Berlin for maintaining a large trade surplus with the US and for its level of military spending – something the president openly branded as “not fair.”“Germany pays 1 percent (slowly) of GDP towards NATO, while we pay 4 percent of a MUCH larger GDP. Does anybody believe that makes sense?” Trump tweeted in June.
The US president also pulled no punches in deriding Germany for its policy on migration as well as energy. During a NATO summit in July, Trump blasted Berlin for its dependence on gas shipments from Russia, going as far as labeling Germany as a “captive” of Moscow.
Trump’s accusations were immediately rebuffed by German officials, who, in turn, began relaying their growing frustration with Washington. “We can’t rely on the superpower of the United States,” German Chancellor Angela Merkel told reporters last month, speaking out against the nation’s dependence on other states.
Jim W. Dean Archives 2009-2014