US urges World Court to dismiss Iran’s lawsuit, insists sanctions lawful

Jennifer G Newstead (L), lawyer for the United States and representative of Iran Mohsen Mohebi talk during the opening of case between Iran and the United States at the The International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the Hague, August 27, 2018.

US lawyers have called on the International Court of Justice (ICJ) – the United Nations’ highest court — to dismiss the Iranian lawsuit calling for a lifting of sanctions against the Islamic Republic and have insisted that sanctions are legal and needed.

Last month, Iran filed a complaint with the Hague-based tribunal, also known as the World Court, asking the principal judicial organ of the United Nations to order the US to lift its recently re-imposed sanctions on the Islamic Republic.

Tehran has called on the ICJ to order the immediate lifting of the sanctions, and demanded compensation for damages incurred in their wake.

Iran believes that the re-imposed American sanctions against Iran violate the terms of a 1955 friendship treaty between the two countries.

But US State Department Legal Adviser Jennifer Newstead argued on Tuesday, the second day of oral arguments in the case that Iran’s appeal based on the 1955 Treaty of Amity, was a legal dodge.

“Iran is endeavoring to use the procedures of the Treaty of Amity to enforce rights that it claims under an entirely different (agreement) that specifically excludes judicial remedies,” she told judges in the court’s wood-paneled Great Hall of Justice

The oral arguments, essentially a request by Iran for a provisional ruling, will last for four days, with a decision to follow within a month.

Newstead argued that the disagreements between the United States and Iran should be resolved through diplomacy and not by the court.

Newstead further told the ICJ in The Hague that it “lacks prima facie jurisdiction to hear Iran’s claims.”

“The United States does intend, lawfully and for good reason, to bring heavy pressure to bear on the Iranian leadership to change their ways,”  she told judges. “We do this in the interests of US national security as well as in pursuit of a more peaceful Middle East and a more peaceful world.”

The US re-imposition of sanctions against Iran came after US President Donald Trump pulled out of the 2015 nuclear deal known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) and set forth 12 new demands in order for the US to agree to a new nuclear deal with Tehran.

America’s European allies have protested against the move, but they are likely to adhere to the sanctions under the US pressure.

“This case is entirely about an attempt to compel the US by order of this court to resume” the 2015 nuclear deal, Newstead said.

The US decision to pull out was motivated by “an acute, long-standing and growing concern about the national security threat posed by Iran,” she stated.

“The sanctions that the United States has re-introduced are lawful and appropriate in the face of Iran’s activities, past, continuing and threatened,” she claimed.

The ICJ was set up in 1946 to resolve international disputes. Its rulings are binding but on rare occasions they have been ignored by certain countries, chiefly the United States.


We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed

In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming educated opinion. In addition, to get a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media, please read our Policies and Disclosures.

Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT. About VT - Comment Policy


    Jennifer Gillian Newstead of New York to be Legal Adviser at the Department of State. Ms. Newstead is a partner in the law firm of Davis, Polk & Wardwell LLP, where she has a global practice representing clients in cross-border regulatory, enforcement and litigation matters. Ms. Newstead previously served in several senior government positions, including as General Counsel of the Office of Management and Budget, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General at the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Policy, and Associate Counsel to the President. Ms. Newstead previously served as an Adjunct Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center in Washington, D.C and earlier in her career clerked for Justice Breyer of the U.S. Supreme Court and for Judge Silberman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. She is a 1994 graduate of Yale Law School, and a 1991 graduate magna cum laude of Harvard University.
    It is obvious she is another Israel lover liar stooge for Israel and the traitors to America who defended the corrupt Patriot Act and the illegal invasion of Iraq by traitor Bush. It was an obscenity for traitor Bush to give lying lawyer Silberman the Medal of Freedom. Our country is a shameful disgrace.

Comments are closed.