What are the odds? Guess which attorney chosen to represent Pittsburgh Synagogue shooter?

3
1276

By Stephanie Sledge

Judy Clarke, high profile attorney from San Diego is representing alleged Pittsburgh Tree of Life Synagogue shooter, Robert Bowers according to several news outlets. Clarke seems to be the high profile attorney that gets all the interesting and questionable cases including:

  • Jared Lee Loughner: The Gabrielle Giffords “Congresswoman on the Corner” 2011 Tucson Shooter
  • Dzhokhar Tsarnaev: The Boston Marathon Bomber
  • Zacarias Moussaoui : 9/11 Terrorists
  • Susan Smith, Child Killer
  • Eric Rudolph: The Olympic Bomber
  • Ted Kaczynski: The Unabomber

Judy Clarke has been the star attorney for several high profile cases over the recent years. However, researchers, journalists, writers, and others want to know why it is Judy Clarke does not present evidence brought forth by researchers that question the validity and true facts in high profile cases including the 2011 Tucson shooting as well as the Boston Bombing.

Judy Clarke, of the legal firm Clarke Johnson, Thorp & Rice were recently assigned as the lead attorney for Robert Bowers on Dec. 27 by U.S. District Judge Donetta Ambrose in Pittsburgh. Bowers is accused of killing 11 people and injuring 6 others on October 27th, 2018. Bowers has pleaded not guilty to 44 charges. However, before the Sheriff, FBI, Police, and other agencies were even done processing the crime scene and collecting the evidence, the media found Bowers guilty of a ‘hate’ crime and President Trump flew to Pittsburgh to address the heinous act against the Jewish community.

Original can be found here

Please Read:

 

****SIGN UP FOR MY EXCLUSIVE MAYDAY MILITARY MOVEMENT DATA VAULT INTEL NEWSLETTER & START GETTING THE INTEL YOU DESERVE – GET YOUR FIRST MONTH FREE!****

What if I told you these CBD Oil products are the best and have a 60 Day Guarantee? What are you waiting for, try it today!! Don’t like it send it back for a full refund. https://cbdoilsforme.com/shop

Author Bio
Stephanie is a Citizen Investigative Journalist and founding editor of THE GOVERNMENT RAG. The Government Rag is an educational alternative news site started in 2009. Stephanie trades in Truth, Freedom, and Transparency. She is committed to educating the public on the real issues that Americans face today.
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

3 COMMENTS

  1. What are the incalculable odds of the same Attorney representing the same types of cases. Notice there’s never really any information available. FOIA system of transparency has essentially been hamstrung w/ more opaqueness. All roads lead to sinister Deep State Statecraft of Neo-Rome Empire still. Sad & disappointing time for a pseudo De-MOCK-craZy.

  2. Judith Clarke’s job seems to have nothing to do with defending her clients but only in forwarding the Government’s lies. I haven’t researched other cases but in the case Zacarias Moussaoui this was obvious his “defense” allowed unverified and in many cases what appeared to be fabricated “evidence” that the jury was instructed by the “judge” not to question nor did the so called “defense” object to the use of a “confession” extracted under torture.

    Also I suspect jury selection was a joke since it coincided with the fictional account of 9/11 released in the obvious propaganda film “United 93” allegedly “based on actual events”.

    So much for justice in America and the rule of law.

  3. Her appointment is a kin to Mueller’s. This will put her on the short list for appointment to the Supreme Court, can anyone say, Justice.
    If I was handed the defense my first motion would be to exhume 11 graves. Just to make sure the trial gets off on the right foot, and my client hasn’t been over charged. Imagine what an uproar that would create. An anitsemetic motion. Eads, Unheard of. I’m sure the poor Tsarnaev boy would recommend her highly . . . if he could talk. Ah, but that throat wound was a well placed one. Fortuitous, one could say. Isn’t the public tired of these dog and pony shows? Her name can be found right next to that federal judge from Manhattan, what’s his name, the guy that gets all the 911 trials. Butt, (spelling intended) there’s nothing to see here, so let’s move along. How about we talk about the poor white guy charged in Charlottesville? He had a wonderful defense attorney. Didn’t he? Another woman I think. Where do try find these dump trucks? Attorneys take an oath too. Don’t they? Rod Serling must be crying in his grave over all the material he is missing out on. Maybe not, as they are reruns. Aren’t they? Cookie cutter defense scripted and brought to you by our very own Department of Justice. A guy can’t win for losing. And what’s happening to the kid in Parkland Fla.? We rarely hear about him. Another throwaway. Where’s Johnny Cochran when you need him? Dead. You don’t say. How? Murder? Hmmm. Fishy. No, Fishy’s the PM of England.

Comments are closed.