Will the Public Find Out if Trump Directed Campaign Contact with Stone on Wikileaks?

Probably not in Stone's prosecution, which is why we need a full public accounting of Mueller’s findings

2
1123
Is Assange an Israeli paid actor like Alex Jones?

On January 24th, a federal grand jury in Washington, D.C. convened by Special Counsel Robert Mueller returned an indictment of Roger Stone for false statements, obstruction of justice, and witness tampering. The indictment alleged that a very senior person in the Trump campaign — perhaps Donald Trump himself — directed subordinates in the summer of 2016 to contact Stone for information about Wikileaks’ plans for additional dumps of emails damaging to Hillary Clinton that had been stolen by Russian hackers.

Intrigue in Stone’s Indictment

On page four of Stone’s indictment, Mueller unexpectedly shifted into the passive voice for one key sentence: After the July 22, 2016 release of stolen DNC emails by Organization 1, a senior Trump Campaign official was directed to contact STONE about any additional releases and what other damaging information Organization 1 had regarding the Clinton Campaign.”

It’s clear from the context that “Organization 1” refers to Wikileaks. What is less clear is what is meant by the curious use of “was directed,” as in, “a senior Trump Campaign official was directed to contact Stone.” There are, of course, only a limited number of people who could have “directed” a senior Trump Campaign official, so there was immediate speculation that prosecutors had shifted to the passive voice to avoid having to say “President 1 directed” or some other phrasing that would have clearly identified Donald Trump.

read more

https://www.justsecurity.org/62480/public-find-trump-directed-campaign-contact-stone-wikileaks/

About VT Editors
VT Editors is a General Posting account managed by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff. All content herein is owned and copyrighted by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

2 COMMENTS

  1. Binney is either hopelessly uninformed or deliberately covering up the truth, which is very simple and has been explained by VT many times.

    Wikileaks doesn’t exist, it is simply Israeli agent Julian Assange acting as the public face of an Israeli front that exists purely to put out material that is damaging to people and groups Israel wishes to attack.

    There was no hacking at all, the NSA gathered the raw data then passed it on to Unit 8200 in Herzliya, Israel where it was sorted and filtered, then portions were spiced up and released through Wikileaks.

    Binney will be well aware of the secret deal put in place under Bush Jr. for the NSA to pass all the raw data it gathers to Unit 8200, he will also be well aware that Wikileaks is a fake Israeli front.

    Therefore it seems most likely he is just another stooge spouting crap in order to cover up the crimes of Israel

Comments are closed.