Midlife Activities Linked to Alzheimer’s, Dementia

3
2136
photo by Carol Duff

Engaging in mental or physical activities dropped dementia risk 44 years later

Cognitive and physical activities in midlife were linked independently with reduced risk of dementia and dementia subtypes, a longitudinal study that spanned 44 years found.

by Judy George Contributing Writer MedPage Today

Women who frequently engaged in cognitive activities — including artistic endeavors, reading, needlework, or social clubs — when they were ages 38 to 54 years were 46% less likely to develop Alzheimer’s disease in late life and 34% less likely to develop dementia, according to Jenna Najar, MD, of the University of Gothenburg in Sweden, and colleagues.

 

“There have been a number of studies looking at the relationship between activities and dementia risk, but the results have been a bit conflicting,” Najar said in an interview with MedPage Today. “One important thing our research contributes is our long observation period. We have followed these women for more than 4 decades. This is important because low activity levels could be an early symptom of dementia processes.”

While several longitudinal studies have reported that mental and physical activity were tied to lower dementia risk, most have a high mean age at baseline and a short follow-up period. Among studies that have followed individuals for longer time spans, outcomes are mixed. Perhaps the most striking long-term result came from another University of Gothenburg study in 2018 that showed highly fit women were nearly 90% less likely to have dementia decades later.

In this population-based study, Najar and colleagues evaluated 800 women from the Prospective Population Study of Women in Gothenburg, following them from 1968 to 2012. At baseline, the women had a mean age of 47 and were assessed in five cognitive activities — intellectual, artistic, manual, club, and religious — with the frequency of each activity rated as no/low (score 0), moderate (score 1), or high (score 2), using the following guidelines:

  • Moderate intellectual activity was reading a book in the last 6 months; high was reading more frequently or writing
  • Moderate artistic activity was visiting a concert, theater, or art exhibition in the last 6 months; high was attending more frequently, playing an instrument, singing in a choir, or painting
  • Moderate manual activity was needlework in the last 6 months or gardening in the last year; high involved several interests or frequent activities
  • Moderate degree of club activity included having a membership; high meant having a board membership
  • Moderate degree of religious activity included church attendance at least a few times in the last year; high included church attendance at least 12 times in the last year

The total possible score was 10. The researchers divided participants into two cognitive activity groups: those with scores of 0 to 2 (44% of participants) and those with scores of 3 to 10 (56% of participants).

They also divided participants into two physical activity groups, active (82% of participants) and inactive (17% of participants), based on baseline assessments using the Saltin-Grimby Physical Activity Level scale. The active group engaged in activities that ranged from light physical activity like walking, gardening, bowling, or biking a minimum of 4 hours per week to regular intense exercise like running or swimming several times a week or competitive sports. The inactive group was sedentary, mostly watching television or movies.


At multiple points in the study, psychiatrists or psychiatric research nurses performed neuropsychiatric examinations, using criteria from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition Revised (DSM-III-R).

Over the follow-up period, a subset of women were diagnosed with dementia (n=194), including Alzheimer’s disease (n=102), vascular dementia (n=27), mixed dementia (n=41), and dementia with cerebrovascular disease (n=81), based on established criteria and information from neuropsychiatric examinations, informant interviews, hospital records, and registry data. Mean age at dementia onset was 79.8. During follow-up, 596 women died; they had a mean age at death of 80.

Women with a high level of cognitive activities had reduced risk of total dementia (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49-0.89) and Alzheimer’s disease (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.36-0.82) than women with a low level of cognitive activities. Women who engaged frequently in physical activity in midlife showed a reduced risk of mixed dementia (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.22-0.86) and dementia with cerebrovascular disease (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.78) than physically inactive women. There was no relationship between physical activity and Alzheimer’s disease.

After excluding women who developed dementia midway through the study (to rule out the possibility that they had prodromal dementia at baseline, with less participation in activities as an early symptom), the researchers analyzed the data again and found similar results, except the link between physical activity and dementia was stronger.

The authors noted several limitations to this analysis. They used medical and hospital registry records to identify individuals lost to cumulative attrition, but those sources underestimate the number of dementia cases. Competing risk of death also may have affected results. Cognitive and physical activities were self-reported and assessed only once in the study, at baseline.

The study was supported by the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, the Swedish Alzheimer Foundation, Swedish Brain Power, the Swedish Brain Fund, the Alzheimer’s Association, the Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation, the Söderström-Königska Hospital Foundation, the Gamla Tjänarinnor Foundation, the Handlanden Hjalmar Svenssons Research Fund Foundation, and IRIS Scholarship.

Najar and co-authors disclosed no relevant relationships with industry.


EDITORIAL DISCLOSURE
All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

3 COMMENTS

  1. Some group should study the herd mentality of Congress to understand why both political parties are more devoted to the foreign country of Israel than to the country they took an oath to serve. Why are we giving Israel billions of dollars every year of our hard earned borrowed and printed money?
    Why are we giving them expensive military hardware and secrets or allowing them to steal them? Has Congress always worshiped Israel over our country? How long has this been going on and why is it going on? Are they bribed, threatened or more? Why hasn’t something been done to expose this massive crime by our so called elected officials who have sold out our country? Observe the deafening silence of Congress about the scandalous treatment of Palestinians by Israel and how the whores in Congress have looked the other way in their failure to acknowledge that Israel and Bush and Cheney and Four Star Generals did 9/11/01 not Muslim patsies.

    • For a further kick in the crotch see https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-10-09/wharton-professor-amir-yaron-said-to-be-next-bank-of-israel-head Another challenge will be what to do about Israel’s ballooning foreign currency reserves, which grew to $115 billion under Flug as the central bank fought to limit the shekel’s gains. Flug’s policy came under sharp criticism from Netanyahu’s economic adviser Avi Simhon, and any signal that those purchases are coming to an end could strengthen the shekel. So are all those ballooning foreign currency reserves coming from the United States? ( Although really it is just a form of money laundering or pretense as to the legitimacy of the digital money,-to say that it is payments from the US, as “they” can inject as much “money” into the worldwide system as “they” want. HINT There is no real accounting worldwide. There is no way that any sort of normal economic activity via taxation could possibly pay for the control grid they are establishing. Remember they create as much money in the system as they want. Any “shortages” produced are just about control of some sector. There is always enough money for war and other advanced technologies like 5G that are harmful to the earth as a whole, like the Geoengineering/Chemtrailing) But for appearances sake all the US payments to Israel does appear to rack up the US Budget deficit, so that on the fake books the US owes more money to the Rothschild Worldwide Central BAnk system.

    • So really the above should say via normal taxation or investment/production activities. How do all those Corporations come up with the Millions/Billions to buy up other corporations? Remember Corporations make most of their money via paper transactions, derivatives, stock other paper stuff that does not even involve producing a product or service. And remember all the digital startups were funded by the CIA/Darpa. The oil companies, financed by the Rothschilds, all the big companies were originally capitalized by dark banking forces. To some extent this was a good thing, the advances of modern society was a good thing up to a point… but the banking forces have always engineered wars for profit. Now it seems the scientific advances, like the atom bomb, tainted vaccines, more wars, AI, is for the harm of mankind and not for the benefit of.