Appeals Court Rejects Challenge to Robert Mueller’s Appointment


A federal appeals court rejected a challenge to Robert Mueller’s appointment Tuesday, marking a major legal win for the special counsel, Politico reports.

The lawsuit, brought by Roger Stone associate Andrew Miller after Mueller tried to subpoena him, claimed that Mueller wields so much power as special counsel that he should have been appointed by either the president, the Senate, or the attorney general—not Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.

The court disagreed, also noting that there was nothing wrong with a deputy AG appointing the counsel after then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from the investigation.

“Special Counsel Mueller effectively serves at the pleasure of an Executive Branch officer who was appointed with the advice and consent of the Senate,” wrote Judge Judith Rogers, in a decision that was joined by Judges Sri Srinivasan and Karen Henderson.

The case might not be over, however—Politico notes that even before the appeals court’s decision was handed down, Miller’s attorney Paul Kamenar said they expected to lose and planned to bring the case to the Supreme Court.

read more at Daily Beast


We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.