Former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen writes in a Washington Post op-ed:

2
1434

The Defense Department announced plans last week to reinstate a ban on openly transgender Americans that, until now, has been blocked by multiple court rulings. This decision hurts our national security, deprives our ranks of much-needed talent and flies in the face of the values our military institution represents.

I should know. As chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from 2007 to 2011, I advocated for — and led our armed forces through — the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell,” a policy that similarly forbade gay and lesbian troops from serving openly.

Like “don’t ask, don’t tell,” the current transgender ban presents itself as a neutral policy imposing narrow restrictions on a segment of the LGBT population instead of what it is: a cudgel broadly targeting a defining characteristic of the population. The new policy allows transgender people to serve only if they avoid being diagnosed with gender dysphoria and agree to serve in their birth sex.

The Pentagon is being too cute by half when it claims that it is not banning transgender service. A policy that targets proxies of being transgender amounts to an effective ban. Worse, it could discourage people from seeking the psychological and medical help they may need, potentially leading — as the RAND study found — to more cases of substance abuse and suicide.

In war, it’s crucial to fight the next battle instead of the last. Likewise, we should be aiming to build the military of the future, not of the past. Discriminating against a group of proven patriots is no way to appeal to the next generation of fighters and only serves to place politics above readiness.

READ THE FULL PIECE: https://wapo.st/2Wf1U1r

 

About VT Editors
VT Editors is a General Posting account managed by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff. All content herein is owned and copyrighted by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

2 COMMENTS

  1. If you’re a sailor who is gay or transgender aboard a navy ship, aren’t you getting a “free peek”, so to speak, every time you use the head and showers facilities? Wouldn’t that be commensurate with a male sailor (so cisgender of me), showering in the female head, or dressing in a female berthing compartment? Bottom line: if you want to pretend that transgender or homosexual to be living in such quarters with heterosexuals, then there is no need for segregated male and female berthing and head facilities aboard ship. Otherwise, you’re a virtual-signaling hypocrite…Mike Mullen!

  2. High School programs today have been hi jacked by the bigots in the College Prep. crowd, throwing those who desperately need occupational skills to the door. This is a disgracerful failure and must be reversed. Most college graduates can’t change flat on the car or a faucet washer in their home. Many join the corrupt military as a last resort when none should join the terrorist military killing people all over this planet. Boycott the U.S. Military with all your soul.

Comments are closed.