Beijing and Moscow to NWO: Maduro stays

We should give two thumbs up for Russia and China for saying that enough is enough. If both countries are stopping the New World Order from destroying any other country in the world, then we should definitely applaud such an effort.

0
2432

…by Jonas E. Alexis

Both Beijing and Moscow seem to have sent an unspoken ultimatum to the New World Order in Washington and elsewhere: Venezuela is not going to become another Iraq or Afghanistan or Libya.

We have seen how Russia sent military troops to Venezuela last weekend, and now China is backing Russia. New World Order agents like John Bolton are again mad and sad and want to be bad. Bolton himself declared that the United States “will not tolerate hostile foreign military powers meddling” within the Western Hemisphere.[1]

Well, the statement self-destructs, doesn’t it? How did the United States get involved in Venezuela in the first place? Who gave New World Order agents the license to steal, kill, and destroy in the name of “democracy” and “freedom”?

In any event, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo told Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov that Washington ‘will not stand idly by as Russia exacerbates tensions in Venezuela.”[2] Mr. Pompeo, do you really think that Russia should stand idly by as the United States exacerbates tensions virtually all over the world? As we have argued elsewhere, the United States has been involved in diabolical activities for over a century![3]

NWO agents like Pompeo has not even apologized to the world for the chaos they have created. In fact, they think that the United States should pick up a country every ten years and destroy it. You almost certainly remember Jonah Goldberg’s endorsement of Michael Ledeen’s diabolical ideology. Goldberg unflinchingly declared:

“I’ve long been an admirer of, if not a full-fledged subscriber to, what I call the ‘Ledeen Doctrine’…’Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business.’”[4]

Both Jewish Neocons Goldberg and Ledeen are destroyers, and they want to use the United States for their dirty work in the Middle East and elsewhere. With respect to the Iraq War, Goldberg added: “The United States needs to go to war with Iraq because it needs to go to war with someone in the region and Iraq makes the most sense.”[5]

Goldberg and his brethren do not believe in dialogue obviously because dialogue presupposes a moral and political order. Goldberg prefers aggressive expansion:

“There is nothing we want to see happen in the Middle East that can be accomplished through talking around long tables festooned with bottled water and fresh fruit at Swiss hotels, that cannot be accomplished faster and more permanently through war. But there is plenty that cannot be achieved by such gabfests that can only be achieved through war.”[6]


Goldberg again declared long before the debacle in Iraq—and pay close attention here:

“Wouldn’t an invasion of Iraq result in instability in the region? Yes. But in this context, instability is more likely to be good than bad.”[7]

Did you catch that? Instability is more likely to be good than bad. Now the same people are telling us that they are attempting to establish “democracy” and “freedom” in Venezuela. Who are these people really kidding?

In any event, we should give two thumbs up for Russia and China for saying that enough is enough. If both countries are stopping the New World Order from destroying any other country in the world, then we should definitely applaud such an effort.


  • [1] “China Takes on U.S. Over Venezuela After Russia Sends Troops: It’s Not Your ‘Backyard,’” Newsweek, March 26, 2019.
  • [2] Ibid.
  • [3] See Stephen Kinzer, Overthrow: America’s Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq (New York: Times Books, 2006).
  • [4] Conor Friedersdorf, “The Real Radicals of the Iraq War: Its Proponents,” Atlantic, March 6, 2013.
  • [5] Ibid.
  • [6] Ibid.
  • [7] Ibid.


EDITORIAL DISCLOSURE
All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy