Exclusive: The Inside Story on Dr. James Fetzer’s Law Suit: Pozner vs. James Fetzer et al


WARNING: This publication contains information free to the American public “We the People” under the First Amendment. Any information you find offensive or inflicts any emotional response will be doing so at your own risk.

This publication is intended for educational and historical value and justifies its permanent retention for archival value, continuing value, and/or its enduring value.

Get involved – find out the truth – share with everyone

**FAIR USE** Copyright Disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Fair use is a legal doctrine that promotes freedom of expression by permitting the unlicensed use of copyright-protected works in certain circumstances. Section 107 of the Copyright Act provides the statutory framework for determining whether something is a fair use and identifies certain types of uses—such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research—as examples of activities that may qualify as fair use.

The Government Rag’s Jack Mullen has an exclusive interview with James Fetzer.

Listen to it here: https://blog.thegovernmentrag.com/2019/06/23/the-inside-story-on-dr-james-fetzers-law-suit-nobody-died-at-sandy-hook/




Author Bio
Stephanie is a Citizen Investigative Journalist and founding editor of THE GOVERNMENT RAG. The Government Rag is an educational alternative news site started in 2009. Stephanie trades in Truth, Freedom, and Transparency. She is committed to educating the public on the real issues that Americans face today.
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. Fetzer has a point. He made his comments based on a death certificate provided by Posner. Now, the judge allows into evidence 3 other certificates under the lame excuse that electronically reproduced copies somehow suffer (selective) degradation. The judge is following procedure allowed by NY Judge Hellerstein, the go to judge for all 911 cases, who ruled Iran (without any evidence) responsible for 911 and awarded plaintiffs some crazy amount of money. 700 billions comes to mind.
    Poor Jim, he’s in the grist mill.

  2. Your comment to discredit is beyond highly doubtful & incredulous. Trolls & shills are easy to spot to anybody using discernment. Faust is a cunning & crafty soul.

  3. https://www.martindale.com/madison/wisconsin/frank-d-remington-1794490-a/
    According to the above link, the trial judge in the Pozner-Fetzer case currently going on in Wisconsin graduated from the University of Wisconsin with an A.B. degree in 1980. But there is no mention of what he majored in. See if you can find his name and picture and major subject in the 1980 Yearbook:
    http://digicoll.library.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/UW/UW-idx?type=header&id=UW.UWYearBk1980 I think you will be disappointed. He likely did not major in any mentally challenging subjects like physics or mathematics like calculus or differential equations or complex variable theory or even probability theory. Who is this judge and what was his early background? He is overshadowed by a very distinguished Father who was originally from New York. His Father the late Frank J. Remington was a distinguished Law Professor at U of Wisconsin, Madison, and a decorated WWII Pilot. Unlike this one of 5 sons, his Father demonstrated enormous courage, intelligence and integrity. He was so good he even made an Obituary in the NY Times: https://www.nytimes.com/1996/02/12/nyregion/frank-remington-who-shaped-laws-and-football-dies-at-73.html I believe if his Father were alive today and could have observed the disgraceful behavior of his 5th son the other day against all the unselfish efforts of the distinguished genius level scholar and professor Jim Fetzer, Ph.D. in the exposure of the Sandy Hook Hoax…Con’t. Below:

    • … Sandy Hook Hoax on America, his Father would seek to disown his own Son! What a shameful disgrace this sorry excuse of Judge in Wisconsin was and is. He appears to conform to the dictum for lying lawyers as enunciated by Earl Carey in his great book “IBM and the Corruption of Justice in America”, Bismarck House, St. Louis, 1992: Quote:
      “The ultimate goal of the education and training a person receives to become a lawyer is dramatically different from other professions and occupations. A lawyer’s education and training can be more accurately described as an indoctrination into a type of satanic cult. Behavior which a normal human being would consider to be repulsive, evil and cruel, forms the standard operating procedures in the daily life of a lawyer. The normal human emotions and traits such as conscience, honesty and honor, and integrity are completely obliterated. An insatiable greed and a blind allegiance in the preservation of the corrupt legal profession take their place. To lie, cheat and steal become second nature and instinctive. Lawyers suffer no remorse for their actions. They have no sympathy for their victims.”
      Quoted from IBM and the Corruption of Justice in America” by Earl Carey, pp. 330-331.
      Winfield J. Abbe, A.B., Physics, UC Berkeley, 1961, M.S., Physics, California State University at Los Angeles, 1962, Ph.D., Physics, UC Riverside, 1966, Institute of Science and Technology Fellow University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1966-1967

Comments are closed.