1. Actually a better place is under your pillow. Just kidding 🙂 You make some a good points though I must say that the only reason that “our” Government hasn’t totally wiped out the Bill of Rights or totally abrogated Treaties is because of they are faced with an armed citizenry.

2. “Vetted”? By whom? By some sleazy bureaucrat and a shrink? I doubt if that what the authors intended. Also I see you totally evaded the fact that the Second Amendment says what it says. Actually handguns are perfect for home defense you’d know this if you knew anything about weapons which obviously you don’t.

   Ignorance of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and weapons in general seems to define most gun control advocates.

3. I think the the 2nd amandment of the US constitution is somewhat taken out of context. Back then 1776, war on Imperial Powers, starvation and immigrants from Europe who didn’t all speak the same language, did they all trust on each others, my guess is no, but they did trust the Constitution and the right to protect their family.

   Today I think Americans have somewhat similar family based thinking, that every family builds her own luck in medicare and education, which tempts the maximum amount of maximum profit parasites like insurance companies and law companies around. This has nothing to do with guns, but all to do to denigrate the only social nationalist candidate Bernie S.

   • The right to self defense is an inherent right and has nothing to do with politics which is why the Second Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights.

     If the American Indian was unarmed they would have been forced into the same situation as the Palestinians where the Israel government is stealing their land unchecked.

4. A miltia is formed by armed citizens not the other way around. Owning a weapon is an individual right which is why it is part of the BILL OF RIGHTS. You seem to ignore the last half that says the “the right of the people to keep and bear arms, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED(emphasis mine)”

   “In the 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court held that the “Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.”

   https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/second_amendment

   However I do agree that training in the use of fire arms should be part of owning a gun. Thus instead of Legislation there should be education instead.

5. Concord and Lexington redux.

Comments are closed.