Breathtaking: Solving Nuclear 9/11, the Pommer Report


Submitted by Heinz Pommer with Jeff Prager to Veterans Today

Introduction by Gordon Duff with Ian Greenhalgh and Jeff Smith (Nuclear weapons designer/particle physicist)

The material here is overwhelming, hours of lectures and dozens of detailed slides.  This is not an easy read.  It is another piece of irrevocable proof regarding 9/11 and the use of nuclear weapons and, on its own, worth much more than just scanning or flipping through.


Architects and engineers say planes don’t knock down skyscrapers.  Nuclear physicists say only atomic bombs can turn out this kind of heat and damage. The real investigators who were silenced by a grand jury and a wealth of threats said it was a conspiracy and named lots of names, some expected, some not.

Now an independent physicist has proven the work done by the original investigators who were silenced and much new work as well.  His modeling and detail is breathtaking.

We were recently introduced to the work of Germany physicist Heinz Pommer.  I chose to contact him.  His work deeply parallels work done by the US Department of Energy and IAEA which was censored and suppressed so that the fake 9/11 report could be published and blame put on Iraq and Afghanistan.

Unlike Pommer’s work (aided by Jeff Prager), the VT team included some of those involved in the ill fated original investigation. Working from different data, to an extent, both teams have ended up with nearly identical results.

VT knows the who, how and when from official sources.  Pommer (and Prager), however, have taken their portion a step further and have produced what the original team would have presented to congress and the president, had they been allowed, of the proofs of nuclear weapons and their effects.  Their work is identical to the secret work by the DOE and Sandia National Labs but adds much as well.

Included are video presentations sent by Pommer to me and his PDF slides.  This material has been submitted to the US team and we will get their comments.

6.3     Demon’s trap 9/11

Your mind is not your consciousness. Your consciousness is your state or quality of awareness of your existence, of being a person.

Your mind, however, can be hijacked and controlled. Your thoughts can be guided to this and that, and finally your mind might simply play the role of an uneducated dog. It barks a lot: “be aware, intruders!”

If your mind is bent the right way (in the sense of the perpetrators of 9/11) you will accept nothing except the fairy tale of Osama bin Laden. Then your mind and your thoughts will clutch and grasp to the last straws, in order to save your world view. It will accept nothing, least of all an offending truth.

Truth, however, is important. So, lets start this subchapter rendering homage to one great defender of the truth, Saint Augustine of Hippo.

Augustine of Hippo (354 – 430 AD)

Saint Augustine of Hippo from Numidia (a Roman province on the North African Coast) was in a certain sense an extremist, whose position could be condensed in the phrase:

“Better to fall with the truth than to stand with the lie.”

He knew Rome well, as he would recognize Rome in modern western society in his splendor and cruelty. Victory at all costs. The truth does not matter, the triumph of the lie is omnipresent and masked – if at all – by the cosy word “illusion”.

To understand the essence of truth – love of God’s creation by all beings – he also studied the lie, defining how these two antipodes reveal themselves in human society.

The next pages show 25 steps in which the destruction process of the South Tower and the processes in the ground are sketched. These sketches did offend many people and were harshly criticized as “fantasy sketches”, or even as a “dangerous effort to deceive the public”.

However, these sketches should be regarded only as a playful approach in an effort to understand a physical process and to calculate a more precise model afterwards. They don’t pretend being “The Truth”. For a conscious person, there is nothing offensive in them. Even if your mind tells you so.

Step 1: Opening of the building at a height of 350 m

Fig. 6-21                                                                                                   Scheme(modified):

Step 2: Connection of the nuclear chimney (ignition of small explosives)

Fig. 6-22                                                                                                   Scheme (modified):

Step 3: Weakening of the building structure through radiation (embrittlement)

Fig. 6-23                                                                                                   Scheme (modified):

Step 4: Weakening of the building structure through small explosives (statics)

Fig. 6-24                                                                                                   Scheme (modified):

Step 5: Weakening of the building structure through melting (radiation)

Fig. 6-25                                                                          Scheme (modified):

Step 6: Nuclear fizzle/neutron flash in the tower

Fig. 6-26                                                                          Scheme (modified):

Step 7: Impact of the explosion, start of the eruption


Hard Xray radiation in the Harfountain nozzle in the tower chamber

Fig. 6-27                                                                          Scheme (modified):

Step 8: Evaporation of the building core by the plasma needle (approx. 8,000 °C)

The bill (Reauthorization 2015)

In 2015, the Congress passed and President Obama signed the reauthorization of the James Zadroga Act. It provided an additional 4.6 billion dollars in funding for its mission.

The bill (9/11 Victims Compensation Fund reauthorization 2019, until … 2090)

According to a Congressional Budget Office estimate, paying out the outstanding claims and future claims would cost $10.2 billion over the next decade.

The bill does not appropriate a specific amount of money to process victims’ compensation claims, instead appropriating “such sums as may be necessary for fiscal year 2019 and each fiscal year thereafter through fiscal year 2090.”



All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. In ’54 I first read Mechanics Illustrated. I’d fingers Fritz the cat and the No Bull pictures in the Classified.
    In the mid ’60’s there was peaceful nuclear. You could blow a canal across Panama or demolish a skyscraper by blowing a hole in the ground under it.
    I can’t find that archived…but I still remember the no-bull button.

  2. Nice drawings but total BS of course.
    Pommer is just Khalezov smarter replacement – there’s no way that as a Physicist he can possibly believe the Nuke-in-a-Hole theory.
    Try a Fizzle Fusion (DT) Fireball Nuke triggered by a small micro nuke and then falling down inside the building – Simple!

  3. That is a convincing theory, but some questions arises. Vaporizing of iron/steel is a very energy consuming process, about 6100kJ/kg. And when it cools back to liquid and furthermore solid state to be seen as black dust, it will release the same energy. Also vapor and liquid iron reacts with ogygen and “burns” to rost, which is highly exothermic reaction releasing significant amounts of energy. Maybe that all took place inside a concrete “vessel” where concrete absorbed all the energy and therefore pulverized, but in that case the concrete dust would have been in very high temperature. The image of it looks too cold, no strong upwards heading cloud, heres one image I found:

    There were also people on the street level and they didn’t have that bad burn injuries, although had been in contact with the dust.

  4. Well thanks VT for bringing this to my attention. That’s why I come here , there is always something new to learn. To me this man answers most of the technical questions and I think maybe even Dr Judy Wood can accept his answer as to how did they did it. It explains the building’s turning to dust , the spire , why no one was damaged by falling glass , the toasted cars , the circular hole in building 6 , the time interval between the initial impact and the falling of the towers, how the underground car parks survived , the reported explosions , the non burning paper, no seismic footprint, why people on the top floors ripped their cloths off and threw themselves out of the windows, the most tragically total lack of even a DNA trace of over 1100 people.
    Now the question is who did it , was it nothing more than an insurance fraud by Silverstein via his 5 dancing Mossad agents on the bridge, was it the US deep state to further enslave the American people behind the patriot act. I have to assume Bush ( lets have no conspiracy theories here ) was in on it because of his total disinterest in even investigating the event.

  5. Very impressive! Also Heinz’s theoretical explanation of the device used explains why there were no trances of Plutonium and what created Silverstein Valley though it could be a natural prehistoric formation where lizard like creatures Lucky Larry “Pull it” Silverstein came from.

  6. Material density and configuration, commensurate with the sizing and placement of the weapon. Do we have anything for this ? Yes, in fact we have the perfect thing. What do you need to put it in place ? Access and two weeks. Done.
    Outcome: Desirable by the UK. Desirable by Israel. Desirable by KSA.
    Losses: Acceptable and manageable.
    Key: Timing. Distraction combined with non-public knowledge.
    Distraction: 9/11
    Real Time: Optimal day for conflagration and deception. Optimal for subtle hypnosis. 6 Imox.