Similarities Between Ayn Rand and Jesus

17
5117

The religious right has made a virtual goddess out of Ayn Rand (born Alisa Zinovyevna Rosenbaum). Rand’s books, in particular The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, promote her open love of greed and selfishness, as well as her deep hatred for altruism. Around the world politicians on the right, particularly in the US, have promoted her Objectivist philosophy and incorporated it into austerity laws and other laws that reward the 1% and punish the 99%, and which are devastating to the working poor.

Many people in the religious left believe that Rand’s philosophy is in direct contrast with the teachings of Jesus. (There is a very good chance that Jesus never even existed as a mere human being, let alone as the son of God. Here is a page with two articles, one taking the position that Jesus did exist as a man, and the other that Jesus is pure myth and never existed even as a man.) However, objectively reading the Christian Bible, we see Jesus was not at all the peace and love hippie type the religious left view him as.

Regarding greed and selfishness, which in and of themselves prohibits altruism, Jesus was on the same page as Rand. For example, why did Jesus tell people to give to the poor? Was it simply because it is the right thing to do and will help a fellow human being? No. It was because the person giving to the poor will get a much bigger reward from God! This is seen in Matthew 6:1-6 which says that Jesus said (IF Jesus really did exist, he wrote nothing himself and all there is to go on are hearsay statements by the anonymous authors of the Gospels which, at the behest of Roman Emperor Constantine, were voted to be part of the Word of God/the Bible):

“Take heed that ye do not your alms before men, to be seen of them: otherwise ye have no reward of your Father which is in heaven. Therefore when thou doest thine alms, do not sound a trumpet before thee, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and in the streets, that they may have glory of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But when thou doest alms, let not thy left hand know what thy right hand doeth: That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly. And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward. But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.”

The end goal of the above teaching the anonymous author of the Gospel of Matthew attributes to Jesus is a personal reward. This is in line with the Objectivism philosophy started by Ayn Rand, and is based on selfishness and greed.

PayPalNOTE TO READERS: My writing work is solely crowdfunded via PayPal. Click here to donate>> Thank you.

Another Bible verse that is Randian to the extreme is found at Luke 6:38 and has Jesus saying:

“Give, and it shall be given unto you; good measure, pressed down, and shaken together, and running over, shall men give into your bosom. For with the same measure that ye mete withal it shall be measured to you again.”

Luke 6:38 not only aligns with Rand and her Objectivism, it is strongly and frequently promoted by Christian prosperity preachers like Joel Osteen and Kenneth Copeland, to motivate the faithful to give to their ministries/businesses to ensure their ability to purchase new jet planes, mansions and $23,000.00 toilets.

One more, among several more, example of Jesus and Ayn Rand being on the same disgusting wavelength regarding greed is found at Matthew 25:14-30. In this ungodly example, Jesus compares God to a greedy bastard who brutally and cruelly punishes a servant/slave for returning the money he left with him without “usury”/interest. Verses 28-30 have Jesus sounding like Ayn Rand. They say that Jesus said:

“Take therefore the talent from him, and give it unto him which hath ten talents. For unto every one that hath shall be given, and he shall have abundance: but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath. And cast ye the unprofitable servant into outer darkness: there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth.”

The above teachings the Bible claims come from Jesus are in sharp contrast to other teachings the Bible claims comes from Jesus. This makes very clear the Bible’s profound ambiguity. The American Founder and Deist Thomas Paine addressed the ambiguity of the Bible in The Age of Reason, The Complete Edition when he wrote, “…the Bible decides nothing, because it decides any way, and every way, one chooses to make it.”

Jesus (IF he existed) and Ayn Rand were both Jews. As Jews they favored the Jewish state of Israel. ((It is not intended to claim all Jews favor Israel’s brutality, as Albert Einstein made clear when he wrote, “Should we be unable to find a way to honest cooperation and honest pacts with the Arabs, then we have learned absolutely nothing during our 2,000 years of suffering and deserve all that will come to us.”) The Zionist Christian John Hagee points this out regarding Jesus in his Seven Biblical Reasons Why Christians Should Support Israel. One of the reasons Hagee uses is based on Jesus deciding to help a Roman centurion by healing his servant after Jewish elders told Jesus that the centurion had built a synagogue for them and that he was good for Israel. This story is found at Luke 7:1-10.

Ayn Rand, and her Objectivism philosophy, not only promote greed, they also favor the Jewish state of Israel. She supported the Jewish state of Israel’s cruel and expanding occupation of Palestinian land and supported Israel in the 1973 Yom Kippur War. A war which was started by Egypt and Syria in efforts to take back the Sinai and Golan Heights from Israel, which were taken in the Six Day War in 1967, a war which Israel started. Now the Ayn Rand Institute, under the direction of its chairman of the board Israeli-American Yaron Brook, is promoting war against Israel’s enemy Iran, just like they did regarding the horrific US war against Iraq. That war, too, was fought for the benefit of the Jewish state of Israel, and for the benefit of greedy and selfish US politicians from both parties who do all they can to please Israel and its powerful lobby.

Rand was a blatant hypocrite. For example, she opposed people getting assistance from the government. HOWEVER, when she needed assistance from the government via Social Security, she took it.

Her attacks against altruism ring hollow because when she wanted to leave her home in the Soviet Union, she came to a nation that would not exist if it wasn’t for the altruism of many of its founders: America. Based on the selfishness and anti-altruism promoted by Rand, successful people like Thomas Jefferson, Ben Franklin and George Washington were wrong to risk all they had for the ideal of the American Republic. And other founders who were not wealthy, like Thomas Paine, were wrong to risk what little they had to support the American Revolution and its ideals. She must have really hated Paine, since he gave away his first financial windfall, which he earned with the sale of Common Sense, to the cause of the American Revolution. I’m profoundly thankful America’s Founders were not infected with the kind of thinking Jesus and Rand promoted.


Loading...

EDITORIAL DISCLOSURE
All content herein is owned by author exclusively.  Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network (VT).  Some content may be satirical in nature. 
All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.
About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

17 COMMENTS

    • If America’s Founder were infected with Randism they never would have started the American Revolution. Most of them were already very successful in their careers and financial situations under the old monarchy system. By starting and fighting the American Revolution they put not only their careers and money on the line, they put their lives and the lives of their families on the line. That is the exact opposite of what Rand taught.

      God gave us reason, not religion! Bob Johnson
      http://www.deism.com

  1. FoxRenard, based on the gospels, Jesus was a Jew who believed the ungodly and cruel Hebrew Bible was the Word of God. Matthew 5:17-18 says that Jesus said, “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” Since heaven and Earth have not passed, based on this statement attributed to Jesus, the repulsive Hebrew Bible/Old Testament is still in effect.

    Also Matthew 15:4-6 has Jesus criticizing the Pharisees because they did not follow the Hebrew Bible/OT command to kill children who curse their parents. These verses have Jesus saying, “For God commanded, saying, Honour thy father and mother: and, He that curseth father or mother, let him die the death. But ye say, Whosoever shall say to his father or his mother, It is a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; And honour not his father or his mother, he shall be free. Thus have ye made the commandment of God of none effect by your tradition.”

    It’s Bible teachings like these that caused the American Founder and Deist Thomas Paine to write in The Age of Reason ( http://www.deism.com/theageofreason.htm ), “It is a duty incumbent on every true Deist, that he vindicate the moral justice of God against the calumnies of the Bible.”

    God gave us reason, not religion! Bob Johnson
    http://www.deism.com

  2. More proof that Jesus did not exist as a man is coming. There are many vectors of this conversation that are not being observed or discussed. They are globally documented however. The sheer nastiness of the Catholics (and I consider all Catholics christians and visa versa) has prevented an open conversation. Bob looks to be a dude who is absorbing a lot more than his readers.
    The four books of the gospel are easily correlated with other text from other cultures. John is surprisingly easy and blatant. Matthew is what they start with and is a give away. Luke follows the trecenas by chapter beginning with Imox. Mark follows the days by chapter beginning with Qanil. Matthew starts with Iq, and that is the cross and the day the papacy ceremonies and Jesuit general ceremonies are. That is the whole thing. A monotheistic take on the twenty days. The one we went through. The one that is ending. John is 21 chapters and starts and ends on Batz. That is why it mirrors Genesis. The whole thing is made up and the books were stolen and modified. They are descriptors, not a story line. mythology, not history. But it is easily altered to make it seem so. Luke 6 is Kame the trecena, does anything happen at verse 13 ? Both good and bad because same ends on Tijax, the balance of polarities. verse 38 is Aqabal,.. 12 hours of day and 12 hours of night, Boris Johnson and Donalds Trumps day. The twins of the Queens assignment for the eviction force,. the angry clowns.

    • Jesus to the Jews :

      « You are of your father the devil, and your will is to do your father’s desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks out of his own character, for he is a liar and the father of lies. »

      John 8:44

      Jesus was not a Jew, he was a Greek and he didn’t support at all the Hebrew bible but he came to bring the knowledge to put an end to the Hebrew bible. What he describes as being the devil chosen by the Jews in the John 8:44 verse is actually YHWH, the Jewish god in their own bible. Jesus was a spiritual guide like Enoch, Zarathustra and Buddha. His message was totally misunderstood as well as modified with purpose by the people who are running the World since at least 2000 years…

    • Give the guy in the painting of “Jesus” a haircut and a shave and you have Joseph Smith. I would guess the the resemblance is intentional, since I saw this image of “Jesus” used many times in the reconstructed Nauvoo Temple (n.b., I was only in the building pre-consecration, and am not a Mormon).

    • Church fathers in the early fourth century appropriated the image of the blue-eyed, fair-haired Macedonian King Alexander the Great to represent their Jesus. No portrait existed of Jesus, because of the Judaic superstition forbidding artistic representations of living beings. Alexander’s portrait was a ubiquitous in the Graeco-Roman world, an instantly recognizable cultural icon of a man universally revered, whom many thought semi-divine. Church officials reasoned that the familiar image of the man who conquered the world 750 years earlier would be an appropriate` model for the likeness of the man they believe conquered death.

      Similarly early depictions of Jesus carrying a lamb on his shoulders are adaptations of the artistic convention of depicting Apollo the Good Shepherd. The Madonna and Child are likewise modeled on art works depicting the goddess Isis suckling her infant son Horus, another sacred image beloved in the ancient world long before Christianity.

    • You mean Christianity was just cobbled together from a bunch of earlier belief systems?

      I wish they taught that in schools, it might just make the world a better place.

      But I sadly have the feeling that people will still be killing each other over a bunch of BS and lies for a long time to come.

  3. Nothing burgers don’t come off the griddle better packed than this post. Bob Johnson, tell me it ain’t you, baby!

    I was raised Roman Catholic when they taught about Jesus the Christ. I fell away as a “Roman Catholic” at age 18, after reading Ayn Rand’s work. I even hitchhiked to New York City in the dead of winter between semesters, showing up at the Nathaniel Brandon office where I understood Ayn Rand might show herself on occasion, on account of the Objectivist Newsletter. I know Jesus and, man alive! Ayn Rand ain’t Him!! Nowhere close — not now here or else where. What piffle.

  4. “to motivate the faithful to give to their ministries/businesses to ensure their ability to purchase new jet planes, mansions and $23,000.00 toilets.” – B. Johnson

    I just want a toilet good at flushing wheat based kitty litter, since it stinks in the summer in the wheelie bin, and a minimum of hard to clean areas.