Arab League bite on opposing West Bank annexation has no teeth


Arab League rejects U.S. shift on Israeli settlements

by Jim W. Dean, VT Managing Editor, … and Press TV, Tehran

[ Editor’s Note: The Arab League has stated once again its opposition to Israel’s move to officially seize the West Bank on a schedule that has been planned with Trump for some time.

In fact, with Trump’s fake “Deal of the Century” having become a stillbirth, annexing the West Bank is being used to bury the failure of the silly deal that young Jared Kushner was leading when it was way over his head.

And surprise, surprise, Trump announces that the US has never been bound by UN resolutions. Meanwhile Israel has invented a new twist, that because the Balfour Declaration gave the land to Israel, it therefore cannot be accused of seizing it since it has always been theirs – a real scraping-the-bottom-of-the-barrel for cover move.

As Israel is continually losing people who leave the country over its high cost, crazy political battles and constant warmongering, it needs the hook of all this new West Bank land to use as its knockoff version of the old US land-rush deals.

Trump has bet the farm on Bibi. However, at Bibi’s “big rally” Tuesday night in Tel Aviv Square, the crowd of a few thousand had to be bused in from outlying areas, and of the 55 members of his Likud Party, only TWO attended the event.

Bibi and Trump may end up as jailbird twins, with both being tried for breach of office and more specifically bribery, which of course in Trump’s world would not even be illegal, but just a business “negotiation”. You just can’t make this stuff up… JD ]

Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>

– First aired … November 26, 2029


Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. Didn’t the early Americans basically steal lands from the real owners the American Indians? Isn’t England one of the largest land thieves on the planet? How about Christopher Columbus from
    Spain too?

    • There were no “real” owners of the land in what is the U.S.of A. The land was originally settled by tribes which were nomadic, and ownership wasn’t a concept involving land. It was a barter / trade culture.

Comments are closed.