Virginia Roberts Giuffre puts Prince Andrew’s ass in a frying pan

Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s testimony is far more plausive than Prince Andrew’s perpetual lies. Prince Andrew has good reason to be scared.

7
3790

…by Jonas E. Alexis

Prince Andrew would be better off telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about his exploration—sexual exploration. In doing this, he would indeed help himself because perpetuating one categorical lie after another during interviews and TV appearances is drawing him closer to his own moral destruction.

For example, we know that Prince Andrew has been working his sex experiments out for years. We know that he has been with Jeffrey Epstein. And we know that he is a pathological liar. How?

Well, Prince Andrew was forthrightly and categorically denying a picture that he took with Virginia Roberts Giuffre! How dumb can it get?

This is Prince Andrew at his best: “I have no recollection of that photograph ever having been taken.”[1] So what? You mean to tell us all that it is not you in the picture? And if it isn’t, then who is it? Your twin brother? A close relative?

Well, Prince Andrew does not have a twin brother. What, then, his “logical” defense? Here it is:

“‘It’s a photograph of a photograph of a photograph,’ Andrew huffed in his interview with BBC journalist Emily Maitlis — and therefore impossible to confirm as a fake, he said. ‘Nobody can prove whether or not that photograph has been doctored,’ he said. But it can’t be real, he reasoned, because ‘as a member of the royal family’ he’s not big on hugging, he said.’ ‘I’m terribly sorry, but if I, as a member of the royal family, and I have a photograph taken — and I take very, very few photographs — I  am not one to, um, as it were, hug,’ he averred.”[2]

“Prince Andrew should go to jail,” said Roberts last month.[3] Andrew is obviously standing on a shaky ground because he has zero evidence to back up his claim. Roberts, on the contrary, has pictures and other circumstantial evidence. Holding up the picture that she took with Andrew back in 2001, Roberts declared:

“This is a real photo. That is Andrew. “It’s been since given to the FBI and they’ve never contested that it’s a fake. “Only one of us is telling the truth. And it will come out”[4]

If you ask me, Andrew is obviously swimming in a swamp of dodo. Roberts moved on to say that Epstein forced her to have sex with “the elite of the world.” She said:

“I was trafficked to other billionaires. I was trafficked to other politicians. They should be named and they should be shamed. What they’ve done is horrific. There wasn’t a part of my body that they did not abuse. “I would be trafficked to somebody who physically and sexually abuses you, to the point you don’t think you’re going to live…Being a kid, I didn’t realize what world I was being brought into.”[5]

So far, Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s testimony is far more plausive than Prince Andrew’s perpetual lies. Prince Andrew has good reason to be scared. Virginia Roberts Giuffre also would do well to start naming names. We know Alan Dershowitz seemed to have had a piece of the sexual pie as well.


  • [1] Laura Italiano, “Prince Andrew doubts photo with Epstein sex slave is real because he doesn’t hug,” NY Post, November 17, 2019.
  • [2] Ibid.
  • [3] Lee Brown, “Virginia Roberts Giuffre says Prince Andrew ‘should go to jail’ over Jeffrey Epstein scandal,” NY Post, November 6, 2019.
  • [4] Ibid.
  • [5] Ibid.

Biography
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, history of Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He is currently working on a book tentatively titled, Kevin MacDonald’s Abject Failure: A Philosophical and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and White Identity. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

7 COMMENTS

  1. Andrew is a diversion from the real corruption, and the Elite will keep the diversion going as long as possible thereby taking the heat off Dershowitz, Clinton and others.

    • I had to look that up, since you mentioned it.
      plausive adjective

      plau·​sive | \ ˈplȯ-ziv
      , -siv\
      Definition of plausive

      1 : manifesting praise or approval
      2 obsolete : pleasing
      3 archaic : specious
      First Known Use of plausive

      1598, in the meaning defined at sense 1

      I always enjoy having something defined and learning something new. It is very plausive.
      The subject of Epstein is not.

  2. From what I understand the pic of Andy the Groper was taken with an analog camera not one of the current digital models thus is almost impossible to fake meaning the Andrew doth protest too much. It’s like the guy standing over the bullet ridden body with the smoking gun ‘splaining that he had nothing to do with it.

  3. “Virginia Roberts Affidavit” ~ teen diary of Randy Prince Andy and DirtBag0witz at Jeffrey’s Kiddie Whorehouse of Horrors, photos and extensive timeline of elite crimes. JizzLane MaxHell did not kill herself, MADAM and pimp is still at large.

  4. And the Israelis continue their genocide of Palestine, unreported by The City of Londons world wide media.

Comments are closed.