The Case for Impeachment, Jackson Rip Holmes Video

7
3202

About VT Editors
VT Editors is a General Posting account managed by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff. All content herein is owned and copyrighted by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

7 COMMENTS

  1. Read your stated Article. Our foreign endeavors have always been suspect and been influenced by moneyed interests. We are addressing impeachment here and can not chase everything that is wrong with our government at once. I will agree with you and the article that “The Democrats are doing themselves no favor by producing delusional and partisan witnesses who repeat Reaganesque claptrap. They only prove that the whole affair is just an unserious show trial” I would argue that it is unwise to lay your argument about Pamela Karlan and her just spewing Russiaphobia to be missguided. Russia can take care of itself and the impeachment of our President will not threaten them and us with WW3. We all know who interferes in national elections more.

  2. The statute only applies to monetary gain thus him stating that he hopes the Ukrainian government launches an investigation into the corrupt activities of Hunter Biden doesn’t fall under it. The ridiculous lengths that the neocons and neoliberal claque are taking to blow smoke on the issue are absurd.

    Personally I’d support the impeachment of any President including Trump for war crimes committed in office or acts of treason but this is not what this is about. This is about continuing the cold war and driving a wedge between Russia and the US which is obviously what the committee wants based on “witness” testimony.

    See Moon of Alabama article December 05, 2019

    The Delusions Of The Impeachment Witnesses Point To A Larger Problem.

    This whole fraud is being perpetrated as a warning to any president who dares to try and normalize relations with Russia.

    • Creating a smear campaign against your political rival does not have anything to do with Russia. the Gall!

    • Maybe you should really read the cited article before commenting. However here is one choice quote from a so called “witnesses” Pamela Karlan a Haaaaavaaaaard Professor.

      “This is not just about our national interests to protect elections or make sure Ukraine stays strong and fights the Russians so we don’t have to fight them here, but it’s in our national interest to promote democracy worldwide.”

      Only a warmongering dipshit would support this circus called an “impeachment”.

    • so hillary hires fusion gps to in turn hire russian thugs to try to rig the 2016 election in her favor. and then, after taking her fall, she flails, “the russians messed up the 2016 election!!!” what a f’in dipchip. i plan on voting repug simply as a reflex to drive the demons to hurt. (until congress repeals the law permitting corp’s to buy elections, whitie is had.)

    • Exactly RPM! Talk about a smear campaign. The whole epic BS about Russia is nothing but a Smear Campaign. One that’s been going on for over three years. Are the dipshit dems concerned about their constituents who voted them in to address healthcare, homelessness, predatory capitalism, the obscene transfer of wealth to the top one percent? No their too busy propping up a Nazi Regime in Ukraine with this total farce they call an impeachment.

      That article I cited says it all.

Comments are closed.