‘We don’t need Britain to show disunity’
…from Russia Today, Moscow
[ Editor’s Note: An EU budget expert I am not. I only just learned they voted on a seven year budget. Can anyone in the US wondering what a cat fight they would be here?
To me, a trillion Euros for seven years, I wonder how they can run their show on that. But it looks like the various nations carry most of the load anyway so the EU budget is for running their cooperative project.
Both theirs and ours are an evolving, or dissolving endeavors as growing numbers of Americans feel we are going backwards despite the allegedly good economy that has been fueled with huge amounts of debt.
One of the quickest things I learned is that Britain’s $50 billion, divided by seven, is not such a big deal for the EU to lose, but a big deal for Britain to gain. Now we will want to see what the Johnson posse does with it.
The EU had a flat 2% growth rate last year, and it isn’t in a war with anybody or under sanctions like Iran. It had a zero growth rate for 2019, which is expected to be 1% in 2020 and 21, with the Trump regime scraping the bottom of the barrel sanctioning Iran’s election officials. How pitiful is that for interfering in someone’s election? … Jim W. Dean ]
– First published … February 21, 2020 –
France’s desire to preserve the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) matched the demands for continued development aid by the EU’s less wealthy members, but ran into determined opposition by Germany and the “frugal quartet” of Denmark, Austria, Sweden and the Netherlands.
“Unfortunately, today… it was not possible to reach an agreement,” said Charles Michel, president of the European Council. “We need more time.”
Unable to reach a deal, the summit in Brussels fell apart on Friday evening, with no one knowing if and when the next one might take place.
The “frugals” insisted that the new budget cannot exceed 1 percent of the EU’s gross national income (GNI), while ambitious members, like Hungary, were shooting for 1.3 percent. A compromise proposal involving approximately 1.074 percent of the GNI (or 1.094 trillion euros) was rejected in the end.
“The differences were simply too big” for a deal, German Chancellor Angela Merkel told reporters. “Even rough data of the new proposal was enough to show that this would not be enough to bridge the differences.”
French President Emmanuel Macron said he “deeply regrets” that a deal was not reached, adding that the failure of the summit shows “we don’t need Britain to show disunity.” The UK officially left the EU on January 31, along with what would have been an estimated 75 billion in contributions over the next seven years.
Belgian politician Guy Verhofstadt argued that the failure of the budget talks was yet another reason to centralize the EU and turn it into a proper “empire” with taxation powers of its own.
Germany and the “frugal” club demanded that any increases in spending go to new priorities such as climate change and managing migrant flows, but the proposal to dip into carbon emissions tax fund was roundly rejected.
Merkel forced the EU’s hand on immigration in 2015, unilaterally opening Germany’s borders to migrants from the Middle East. Demands for other members to help absorb the migrants have been rejected by Hungary and Poland, among others.
The current EU budget, adopted in 2014, expires in December.
Jim W. Dean Archives 2009-2014