…by Jonas E. Alexis and John W. Whitehead


Jonas E. Alexis

Remember what happened right after the 9/11 attack? Just in case you didn’t get the memo, the Bush administration passed a law which gave the Deep State a license to invade people’s privacy.[1] The Washington Post itself declared in 2005:

“President Bush signed a secret order in 2002 authorizing the National Security Agency [NSA] to eavesdrop on U.S. citizens and foreign nationals in the United States, despite previous legal prohibitions against such domestic spying…”[2]

All of this was done illegally.[3] The New York Times itself admitted then,

“The previously undisclosed decision to permit some eavesdropping inside the country without court approval was a major shift in American intelligence-gathering practices, particularly for the National Security Agency.”[4]

Back in 2003, the New York Times wrote an article entitled, “Big Brother Is Watching You. Without a Warrant.”[5]

Regardless of what you believe about what happened on 9/11, one thing is for sure: the attack was not good for America and the Western world, but it was good for Israel. If this seems to be an outrage, let us hear this admission from the mouth of Benjamin Netanyahu himself:

“We [the Israelis] are benefiting from one thing, and that is the attack on the Twin Towers and Pentagon, and the American struggle in Iraq.”[6]

Those events, continued Netanyahu, “swung American public opinion in our favor.”[7] This is again interesting because the 9/11 attack sent political and moral shockwave around the world, but Netanyahu was diabolically laughing and saying that it was good for Israel! Take it from the New York Times:

“Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu…replied, ‘It’s very good.’’ Then he edited himself: ‘Well, not very good, but it will generate immediate sympathy.’

“He predicted that the attack would ‘strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because we’ve experienced terror over so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.’”[8]

In short, 9/11, terrorism, false flags, the NSA, Big Brother, the Deep State, and covert activity always and inexorably swing in Israel’s favor. This was one reason why Israeli scholar Avner Cohen did not hesitate to say, “Hamas, to my great regret, is Israel’s creation.”[9] Big Brother’s covert activity was predicted by John W. Whitehead way back in 2014.

John W. Whitehead

Time to buckle up your seatbelts, folks. You’re in for a bumpy ride.

We’re hurtling down a one-way road toward the Police State at mind-boggling speeds, the terrain is getting more treacherous by the minute, and we’ve passed all the exit ramps. From this point forward, there is no turning back, and the signpost ahead reads “Danger.”

Indeed, as I document in my book A Government of Wolves: The Emerging American Police State, we’re about to enter a Twilight Zone of sorts, one marked by drones, smart phones, GPS devices, smart TVs, social media, smart meters, surveillance cameras, facial recognition software, online banking, license plate readers and driverless cars—all part of the interconnected technological spider’s web that is life in the American police state, and every new gadget pulls us that much deeper into the sticky snare.

In this Brave New World awaiting us, there will be no communication not spied upon, no movement untracked, no thought unheard. In other words, there will be nowhere to run and nowhere to hide.

We’re on the losing end of a technological revolution that has already taken hostage our computers, our phones, our finances, our entertainment, our shopping, our appliances, and now, it’s focused its sights on our cars. As if the government wasn’t already able to track our movements on the nation’s highways and byways by way of satellites, GPS devices, and real-time traffic cameras, government officials are now pushing to require that all new vehicles come installed with black box recorders and vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) communications, ostensibly to help prevent crashes.

Yet strip away the glib Orwellian doublespeak, and what you will find is that these black boxes and V2V transmitters, which will not only track a variety of data, including speed, direction, location, the number of miles traveled, and seatbelt use, but will also transmit this data to other drivers, including the police, are little more than Trojan Horses, stealth attacks on our last shreds of privacy, sold to us as safety measures for the sake of the greater good, all the while poised to wreak havoc on our lives.

Black boxes and V2V transmitters are just the tip of the iceberg, though. The 2015 Corvette Stingray will be outfitted with a performance data recorder which “uses a camera mounted on the windshield and a global positioning receiver to record speed, gear selection and brake force,” but also provides a recording of the driver’s point of view as well as recording noises made inside the car. As journalist Jaclyn Trop reports for the New York Times, “Drivers can barely make a left turn, put on their seatbelts or push 80 miles an hour without their actions somehow, somewhere being tracked or recorded.” Indeed, as Jim Farley, Vice President of Marketing and Sales for Ford Motor Company all but admitted, corporations and government officials already have a pretty good sense of where you are at all times: “We know everyone who breaks the law, we know when you’re doing it. We have GPS in your car, so we know what you’re doing.”

Now that the government and its corporate partners-in-crime know where you’re going and how fast you’re going when in your car, the next big hurdle will be to know how many passengers are in your car, what contraband might be in your car (and that will largely depend on whatever is outlawed at the moment, which could be anything from Sudafed cold medicine to goat cheese), what you’re saying and exactly what you’re doing within the fiberglass and steel walls of your vehicle. That’s where drones come in.

Once drones take to the skies en masse in 2015, there will literally be no place where government agencies and private companies cannot track your movements. These drones will be equipped with cameras that provide a live video feed, as well as heat sensors, radar and thermal imaging devices capable of seeing through the walls of your car. Some will be capable of peering at figures from 20,000 feet up and 25 miles away. They will be outfitted with infrared cameras and radar which will pierce through the darkness. They can also keep track of 65 persons of interest at once. Some drones are already capable of hijacking Wi-Fi networks and intercepting electronic communications such as text messages. The Army has developed drones with facial recognition software, as well as drones that can complete a target-and-kill mission without any human instruction or interaction. These are the ultimate killing and spying machines. There will also be drones armed with “less-lethal” weaponry, including bean bag guns and tasers.

And of course all of this information, your every movement—whether you make a wrong move, or appear to be doing something suspicious, even if you don’t do anything suspicious, the information of your whereabouts, including what stores and offices you visit, what political rallies you attend, and what people you meet—will be tracked, recorded and streamed to a government command center, where it will be saved and easily accessed at a later date.

By the time you add self-driving cars into the futuristic mix, equipped with computers that know where you want to go before you do, you’ll be so far down the road to Steven Spielberg’s vision of the future as depicted in Minority Report that privacy and autonomy will be little more than distant mirages in your rearview mirror. The film, set in 2054 and based on a short story by Philip K. Dick, offered movie audiences a special effect-laden techno-vision of a futuristic world in which the government is all-seeing, all-knowing and all-powerful. And if you dare to step out of line, dark-clad police SWAT teams will bring you under control.

Mind you, while critics were dazzled by the technological wonders displayed in Minority Report, few dared to consider the consequences of a world in which Big Brother is, literally and figuratively, in the driver’s seat. Even the driverless cars in Minority Report answer to the government’s (and its corporate cohorts’) bidding.

Likewise, we are no longer autonomous in our own cars. Rather, we are captive passengers being chauffeured about by a robotic mind which answers to the government and its corporate henchmen. Soon it won’t even matter whether we are seated behind the wheel of our own vehicles, because it will be advertisers and government agents calling the shots.

Case in point: devices are now being developed for European cars that would allow police to stop a car remotely, ostensibly to end police chases. Google is partnering with car manufacturers in order to integrate apps and other smartphone-like technology into vehicles, in order to alert drivers to deals and offers at nearby businesses. As Patrick Lin, professor of Stanford’s School of Engineering, warns, in a world where third-party advertisers and data collectors control a good deal of the content we see on a daily basis, we may one day literally be driven to businesses not because we wanted to go there, but because someone paid for us to be taken there.

Rod Serling, creator of the beloved sci fi series Twilight Zone and one of the most insightful commentators on human nature, once observed, “We’re developing a new citizenry. One that will be very selective about cereals and automobiles, but won’t be able to think.”

Indeed, not only are we developing a new citizenry incapable of thinking for themselves, we’re also instilling in them a complete and utter reliance on the government and its corporate partners to do everything for them—tell them what to eat, what to wear, how to think, what to believe, how long to sleep, who to vote for, whom to associate with, and on and on.

In this way, we have created a welfare state, a nanny state, a police state, a surveillance state, an electronic concentration camp—call it what you will, the meaning is the same: in our quest for less personal responsibility, a greater sense of security, and no burdensome obligations to each other or to future generations, we have created a society in which we have no true freedom.

Pandora’s Box has been opened and there’s no way to close it. As Rod Serling prophesied in a Commencement Address at the University of Southern California in March 17, 1970:

“It’s simply a national acknowledgement that in any kind of priority, the needs of human beings must come first. Poverty is here and now. Hunger is here and now. Racial tension is here and now. Pollution is here and now. These are the things that scream for a response. And if we don’t listen to that scream – and if we don’t respond to it – we may well wind up sitting amidst our own rubble, looking for the truck that hit us – or the bomb that pulverized us. Get the license number of whatever it was that destroyed the dream. And I think we will find that the vehicle was registered in our own name.”

You can add the following to that list of needs requiring an urgent response: Police abuse is here and now. Surveillance is here and now. Imperial government is here and now. Yet while the vehicle bearing down upon us is indeed registered in our own name, we’ve allowed Big Brother to get behind the wheel, and there’s no way to put the brakes on this runaway car.


About John W. Whitehead:  John is an attorney and author who has written, debated and practiced widely in the area of constitutional law and human rights. Whitehead’s concern for the persecuted and oppressed led him, in 1982, to establish The Rutherford Institute, nonprofit civil liberties, and human rights organization whose international headquarters are located in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Deeply committed to protecting the constitutional freedoms of every American and the integral human rights of all people, The Rutherford Institute has emerged as a prominent leader in the national dialogue on civil liberties and human rights and a formidable champion of the Constitution. Whitehead serves as the Institute’s president and spokesperson. Widely recognized as one of the nation’s most vocal and involved civil liberties attorneys, Whitehead’s approach to civil liberties issues has earned him numerous accolades and accomplishments, including the Hungarian Medal of Freedom and the 2010 Milner S. Ball Lifetime Achievement Award for “[his] decades of difficult and important work, as well as [his] impeccable integrity in defending civil liberties for all.”

Whitehead earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Arkansas in 1969 and a Juris Doctorate degree from the University of Arkansas School of Law in 1974. He served as an officer in the United States Army from 1969 to 1971.


  • [1] See for example James Risen and Eric Lichtblau, “Bush Secretly Lifted Some Limits on Spying in U.S. After 9/11, Officials Say,” NY Times, December 15, 2005; Dan Eggen, “Bush Authorized Domestic Spying,” Washington Post, December 16, 2005; Robin Toner, “After the Attacks: Civil Liberties; Some Foresee a Sea Change In Attitudes of Freedoms,” NY Times, September 15, 2001; James Bamford, A Pretext for War: 9/11, Iraq, and the Abuse of America’s Intelligence Agencies (New York: Anchor Books, 2005).
  • [2] Dan Eggen, “Bush Authorized Domestic Spying,” Washington Post, December 16, 2005.
  • [3] James Risen and Eric Lichtblau, “Bush Secretly Lifted Some Limits on Spying in U.S. After 9/11, Officials Say,” NY Times, December 15, 2005.
  • [4] James Risen and Eric Lichtblau, “Bush Lets U.S. Spy on Callers Without Courts,” NY Times, December 16, 2005.
  • [5] James Bamford, “Big Brother Is Watching You. Without a Warrant,” NY Times, May 18, 2003.
  • [6] “Report: Netanyahu says 9/11 terror attacks good for Israel,” Haaretz, April 16, 2008.
  • [7] Ibid.
  • [8] James Bennett, “A DAY OF TERROR: THE ISRAELIS; Spilled Blood Is Seen as Bond That Draws 2 Nations Closer,” NY Times, September 12, 2001.
  • [9] Quoted in Andrew Higgins, “How Israel Helped to Spawn Hamas,” Wall Street Journal, January 24, 2009.

Biography
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, history of Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He is currently working on a book tentatively titled, Kevin MacDonald’s Abject Failure: A Philosophical and Moral Critique of Evolutionary Psychology, Sociobiology, and White Identity. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

7 COMMENTS

  1. I don’t know about the situation in the USA, but in Russia they seem to be in a hurry to enslave the society by digitalisation. From one point, it is convenient to do everything from smartphone: buy goods, pay taxes, order tickets, buy the island or order food. Internet and e-possibilities in my country are the greatest and get-at-table. From the other point, we become slaves and give birth to multiple e-criminals, which steal money using inet, etc. I’m really bloody tired because of the second week-long ban at FB just for my arguement. The same ban can be in real life: switched off credit card, arrested accounts, arrested documents, rights of a citizen, etc. They say: digitalization of the services make our life easy. We remember – it is a trap. Dual benefits. I do really miss USSR. Sometimes…

    • Thus: i have full 4G high-speed internet on the phone, unlimited, for $6.00 per month. Yes, it is cheap. But this is the price Big Bro buys me for.

  2. GM blamed Brooke Melton for her death — then covered up the real cause
    By Larry Getlen
    March 7, 2020 | 11:16am | Updated
    “Brooke Melton (inset) died after her Chevrolet Cobalt swerved into traffic.AP/The Cooper Firm
    On March 10, 2010, Brooke Melton’s Chevrolet Cobalt veered into oncoming traffic on Georgia’s Highway 92 and was struck head-on by another car. The 29-year-old nurse was killed instantly.
    The police report cited the cause as, “Driver error: Driving too fast for conditions.”

    But in fact, the accident was due to a defect that could have been replaced for just 50 cents per car, a fact that General Motors covered up for years, writes attorney Lance Cooper in “Cobalt Cover-Up: The Inside Story of a Deadly Conspiracy at the Largest Car Manufacturer in the World” (Zondervan Books), out now, co-written by Mark Tabb.”
    When these fancy control systems fail in these expensive cars they become death traps. Do not buy them especially from cover up scammers and liars at GM. GM should never have been bailed out but allowed to fail.

    • The above excellent but disturbing article was quoted from the NY Post. Everyone involved at GM should be jailed for life for manslaughter., Instead they were permitted to buy their way out of jail.

  3. The trick is to have some kind of fair and impartial oversight group, like a jury of pears to oversee those who have access and interest in observing this data. The genie is out of the bottle. AI is not going away. Hackers and those with access and ill-intent are a problem that may be unsolvable. In my initial comment i mentioned lawyers working on sensitive cases being a grave concern. That came to mind as I thought of a friend who was an eccentric lawyer who for some unexplained (sleep?) reason drove his car off a mountain rd. My suspicious mind questioned the accident. But the implications of this technology make Gen. Patton’s “Boston Brake” problem rather simple. Ignorance sweet ignorance.

  4. “Breathtaking: Solving Nuclear 9/11” at VeteransToday(.)com

    Based on Independent research by Heinz Pommer at 911history(.)de and includes 80 article bibliography of VT articles, beginning in May 2014, which trace the entire CIA/mossadist network for 9/11. In an interview on Sept 12, 2001 our traitor ally leader disclosed the size of the WTC-1 & 2 nukes

    “It took 350 tons of TNT to bring down the Twin Towers” ~ NuttYahoo

  5. Its all in your head. And so is Big Brother.

    The HemiSynch Process

    The Monroe Institute of Applied Science

    https://ia801401.us.archive.org/14/items/m.i.a.s.bulletin-1980/M.I.A.S.%20Bulletin%201980%20March%20-%20The%20Hemi-Sync%20Process.pdf

    https://ia801401.us.archive.org/14/items/m.i.a.s.bulletin-1980/M.I.A.S.%20Early%20History%20and%20Development%20of%20the%20Monroe%20Institute%20-%20Robert%20A.%20Monroe.pdf

    An INSCOM Beyond Excellence: Army High Performance TaskForce Report

    A 19-page report acquired via a Freedom of Information Act request to the Department of the Army asking for any openly-acknowledged collaboration between The Monroe Institute and Army intelligence. INSCOM was the central institution in Jon Ronson’s “The Men Who Stare At Goats,” later made into a film of the same name, and is infamous for attempting to create “psychic super warriors.”

    https://archive.org/details/INSCOMHPTFReport/page/n6/mode/2up

Comments are closed.