The coronavirus pandemic is fast becoming an argument for socialism
Even bitter enemies of China and Cuba concede that their Covid-19 responses have been heroic, writes ZOLTAN ZIGEDY
Nothing exposes the hypocrisy, arrogance and selfishness of capitalism and its backers like a major threat or catastrophe.
Three-hundred Chinese doctors began arriving in Italy on Wednesday March 18 to help the local effort against the coronavirus (52 health professionals also arrived from socialist Cuba last week).
In addition, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) is sending testing kits and protective clothing. PRC has sent kits and gear to Spain, Greece and Poland as well.
While the Wall Street Journal (March 19) grudgingly reports this international solidarity, it is also compelled to admit that “many people feel let down by the European Union … No other EU countries responded to an Italian plea for masks earlier in March, and German authorities temporarily impeded deliveries of medical supplies to Italy.”
The head of a European think tank remarked: “This is a shocking failure of European solidarity.
“The impression in Italy, Spain and Serbia and so on is that the weaker links will be left alone.”
The Italian and Chinese governments announced that the PRC will supply needed ventilators and face masks.
Balkan countries unable to acquire supplies from the EU are also getting assistance from the PRC, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic bitterly commented: “European solidarity does not exist. It was a fairytale.”
Contrast this commentary on European indifference with the arrogant self-righteousness of the policy of “open borders” as formerly proclaimed by EU leaders.
When workers expressed their reservations about unlimited immigration eroding wages and benefits in the EU, the Euro-leadership indignantly charged “xenophobia.”
Waving the banner of human rights, the EU chiefs welcomed immigrants — mostly the victims of imperialist aggression — desperately looking for jobs at any cost, while appearing to take the moral high ground.
Once the “reserve army” overflowed to create stress on the EU safety net, the welcome mat was quietly removed.
European workers understood the simple fact that in a capitalist economy the labour of workers is a commodity like any other element in the productive process and that capitalists seek to purchase that commodity as cheaply as possible.
They anticipated that humanitarian sentiments were too often a cover for cheapening the cost of labour.
The formerly putative human-rights crusaders of an EU without borders are now panicked in a mad dash of self-preservation, hoarding resources and closing borders. Today’s pandemic crisis exposes their hypocrisy.
But neither neglect nor arrogance is a monopoly of the capitalist European Union.
It is now widely acknowledged that the austerity imposed upon the US public sector since the crash of 2007-09 bears a responsibility for the lack of funding for the agencies, like the Centre for Disease Control (CDC), that needed to address the threat from the coronavirus.
In addition, the CDC displayed an unforgivable hubris, ignoring the international efforts to contain the virus and the lessons learned.
In accounts from as diverse sources as National Public Radio and the Wall Street Journal, we learn that the CDC chose to develop its own testing kits for the virus, ignoring the existing technologies of the World Health Organisation and the PRC.
When their own kits went into production they proved faulty, setting the programme back.
Rather than turning to existing internationally used designs, the CDC sought to make its own corrections, further delaying production.
The CDC vastly underestimated the virus’s deadliness and its contagion.
The spread of the virus is rapidly outstripping the availability of testing kits, attesting to the conceit of Make America Great Again.
Despite the lack of testing kits in the US, many have noticed that celebrities, sports figures, politicians and others of our “betters” have cut the line and acquired tests before the most needy — the ugliest side of the inequality of class society.
Also, reliable accounts have surfaced that some US elected officials have used their privileged information to enable them to liquidate their equity portfolios before the great March stock market collapse.
Workers employed in low-wage service-sector jobs are the most vulnerable to intensive and persisting human contact and potential infection and are the least able to sustain the economic consequences of the pandemic.
It is not true that we are all in this together. Some are in it for themselves.
For any thinking observer, the coronavirus pandemic is fast becoming an argument for socialism.
Even a bitter enemy of public ownership, planning, and economic equality like the Wall Street Journal caustically acknowledges that the PRC’s remarkable defeat of the coronavirus epidemic was achieved with the quickly mobilised, effective state-owned enterprises (SOEs).
In a tellingly titled article (China Steps Back From Market Economy, March 19), Lingling Wei cites the 20,000 SOE construction workers and supportive public enterprises that built two hospitals with 2,600 beds within two weeks, an achievement impossible in the capitalist West.
Lingling cites an official: “It’s like in a battlefield, and state-owned enterprises are the ones who can act fast and decisively.”
The co-ordination of SOEs was formidable, with petrochemical enterprises working to produce materials for masks and pharmaceuticals.
State-owned housing ordered reduced rents by “tens of millions of dollars.”
Despite the reduced production necessitated by social isolation, the central government pressed SOEs to maintain employment, even “hire more, especially college graduates.”
The WSJ concedes that “many private manufacturers are struggling to restore production, yet more than 95 per cent of some 20,000 industrial companies controlled by the central government are churning out masks, medicines, steel, heavy machinery and other products — keeping workers on the job.”
Western commentators bemoan the success of the SOEs, interpreting it as a setback for the hope of privatisation (so-called “market reforms”) in PRC.
One former WSJ writer complained: “If and when the outbreak fades, the conclusion is inevitably going to be that the overwhelming exercise of state power saved China.”
In exemplary acts of solidarity fully consistent with its long history of internationalism, tiny socialist Cuba, suffering a criminal US blockade and brutal sanctions, is offering doctors and drugs to several stricken countries.
When the US refused to allow the British cruise ship, MS Braemer, to dock, Cuba met its humanitarian duty and allowed its passengers to disembark and travel home by air.
The contrast with Western, capitalist efforts is striking.
The PRC (and Democratic Republic of Vietnam) have largely arrested the virus.
In the US, there are far too few test kits, masks and ventilators. New York City hospitals are overwhelmed. State administrations and the federal government are in dispute over responsibilities while disaster looms.
And tragically, the political and economic elites are more determined to rescue markets and corporations than humans. Trillions have been earmarked to bail capitalism.
The idiocies, irrationalities and unnecessary injuries of 21st-century capitalism are coming into full, tragic view.
His studies in history and background in the media industry have given him a keen insight into the use of mass media as a creator of conflict in the modern world.
His favored areas of study include state-sponsored terrorism, media manufactured reality and the role of intelligence services in manipulation of populations and the perception of events.