5 – Mortality “calibrated” by SARS-CoV and HIV intensity?
6 – Chimeric supervirus dual-use: vaccine or bio-weapon
«Whoever does not believe has already been condemned, because he didn’t believe in the name of the only-begotten Son of God. And the judgment is this: light has come into the world, but men have preferred darkness to light, because their works were evil. In fact, anyone who does evil hates the light and doesn’t come to light so that his works aren’t revealed. But whoever works the truth comes to light, so that it may appear clearly that his works have been done in God».
Jesus Christ – John’s Gospel (3, 18-21)
by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio for VT Italy
«Finally we should be able to systematically check when the “fake news” label is attributed to a news that the news is not in fact a fake news but that “the fake news labelling” is itself “a fake news“! Unfortunately, this is probably not the latest pandemic due to reckless human actions on the wildenvironment (Bricage, 2011). The problem is that they are getting closer and closer and the associated viruses are getting more and more aggressive. How to stop this escalation of the violence of interactions between the human species and its host ecosystem? Should environmental faults be used as an alibi to hide technologicalfaults, whatever the reasons? Primarily all aren’t societal, economic or/and political faults?».
The words of French professor Pierre Bricage are a punch in the stomach because they hit and sink the battleship of the mainstream with the unstoppable power of human logic in search of truth. It is no coincidence that I wanted to quote a passage from the Gospel on the wicked fearful that their misdeeds will be revealed…
That CoVid-19 epidemic is a dark and devilish trap for humanity and the planet is now a widespread certainty among those who have carefully read at least a dozen scientific articles and not just social posts.
That SARS-CoV-2, another name of this Acute Respiratory Syndrome that refers to the other deadly strains of the CoronaVirus SARS of 2003 and MERS of 2014, is a Genetically Modified Organism: that is now declared also by retired scientist Bricage, for 29 years Professor of Biology at the Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour and for a luster also head of the Department of Biological Engineering of Pau, capital of the Beam and Pyrenees Atlantiques.
He explained it in a conference in France at the end of February, he wrote it in a research published in March on Research Gate (the Wikipedia of science), he reiterated it in the study republished in English on the same website in April but everything remained submerged in the swamp of mediatic silence.
Now, thanks to our continuous research on Covid-19, we have intercepted his sensational new document of May 1st enriched by further stainless scientific details, by disturbing questions and by disruptive ethical considerations such as those reported in quotes above and below…
«What can we learn from the emergence of this new pandemic? A proposal not having been proved, does not mean that it is automatically false; many are those who commit this error of logic. That does not mean it is true either. But, if the source has some legitimacy, as for a simple honest testimony, it is worth testing it!» the researcher asserts in his conclusions that we put before his rigorous study.
«Why does it only deal with “conspiracies” against the consensual version of the accidental appearance of SARS-CoV-2 from a wild animal? Why are the aspects validating this track the only accepted and published ones? Whyare papers dealing with non-consensual versions systematically rejected? Is there a global attempt to hide partof the reality and re-write the history of both the origin of the virus and the pandemic? Can we be a judge and a part of such an important investigation for humanity?».
Since 2000, the transalpine biological engineer, already specialized in molecular genetics, has been vice-president of the French Association of Science and Cognitive and Technical Systems, on behalf of which he participates in international meetings of the EMCSR (the European Meeting on Cybernetics and Research Systems) but he has been lecturer too for UNESCO and also for NATO, for which he dealt with industrial technology issues. Being a retired academic, he teaches Health Sciences at the University of Pau and Evolution of Living Systems at the Université du Temps Libre d’Aquitaine..
He is therefore a free scientist who doesn’t have to kneel in front of Big Pharma or state institutes to survive, just like his most illustrious compatriot Luc Montagnier, the virologist who won the Nobel Prize for Medicine in 2008, for discovering of the human immunodeficiency tied with HIV virus, discovered by himself in 1983, and AIDS epidemic.
And just like that scientist, Bricage hasn’t doubts about the nature of CoVid-19, of which he also reveals disconcerting secrets which support the increasingly well-founded suspicion of an intentional concealment of truth by the international scientific community.
This community is probably terrified by the risk of losing the huge business built on the research of vaccines and bacteriological weapons, developed in North America since 1952 as evidenced by a declassified US Navy video published by Gospa News on YouTube.
«Usually, common cold is not a danger, but a new strain of coronavirus is killing man species. Why did this newcoronavirus, named at first 2019-nCoV and then re-named SARS-CoV-2, emerge without anybody being ableto identify neither the reservoir nor the vector?» wonders Bricage who published every scientific detail of his studies, illuminated by his competence in biological engineering.
«This virus could not haveemerged spontaneously by natural mutations and wild strains recombinations, it is a genetic chimaera with artificial insertions of modified genes, an engineered genome of a coronavirus within a capsid of a Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)» he ruled lapidary in his 40-page study in which he inserted among the keywords “genetically modified organism”.
The French original is titled: “Le nouveau coronavirus chinois est-il un avatar d’un coronavirus génétiquement modifié pour fabriquer un vaccin curatif du SIDA? Pourquoi le SARS-CoV-2 ne serait-il pas un virus d’origine naturelle? Aspects écologiques, physiologiques, génétiques et évolutifs”.
His questions are marked by diplomatic caution even if his scientific revelations of molecular genetics leave no escape for doubt and are devastating for the theory of the natural origin of the CoronaVirus responsible for the pandemic …
In three weeks, it is the second torpedo that strikes and sinks the credibility of the World Health Organization together with all the national health institutions that fear to see the generous funding provided by Geneva and the pharmaceutical multinationals (that feed it) disappear from their sumptuous plate.
It is the second rocket if we don’t consider the shock video entitled Plandemic (Planned Pandemic) by Judy Mikowitz, holder of a Ph.D. in Molecular Biology at George Washington University, to which we haven’t paid attention because the interesting scientific arguments are too watered down by anecdotes of professional disputes with Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the American NIAID (National Institute Allergy Infectives Disease), and his socio-political considerations as activist No-Vax. Gospa News mainly reports objective and verifiable facts before the opinions.
In a few days Bricage is the second lighthouse that brings light into the mysterious darkness of the CoVid-19, immediately revealing a disturbing detail.
«The genetic sequencing of this 2019-nCoV virus indicated that its genome looked like that of anothercoronavirus that was issued from a bat and isolated in 2013. With the registration, in 2020, of the viral strain RaGT13, that was isolated in 2013 (as its namesuggests), other phylogenies were then proposed (Bedford & Hodcroft, 2020). They replaced the SARS-CoV-2 in an evolutionary position more fitting in with the past known ones. Why was the alleged ancestral strain, isolated in 2013, and on which research has been carried out, not registered in the genetic data banks before 2020 and only after the 2019-nCoV registration, which strain was then renamed as SARS-CoV-2?».
If there were determined heads of State such as that of Tanzania – which raised the suspicion that the swabs received from his country have failed after they tested a goat and a papaya as positive for the human virus and therefore declared to terminate any relationship with the WHO – probably all the leaders of this organization would already be under investigation given the devastating scope of that question. But the interests at stake are enormous and transnational, as we will see in the next reports…
It is the scientist Bricage himself who explains to us why this does not happen, asking rhetorical questions at the end of his long and painstaking scientific study.
«Why did a group of 27 prominent scientists insist on discrediting the artificial origin of the newcoronavirus? Are we rewriting the virus history? Wouldn’t transparency prevent this kind of scientific, political and media imbroglio? How can we prevent economics from mixing into issues and thus underminesthe social and environmental responsibility (Bricage, 2011) of both research laboratories, health companiesand individuals? Does mathematical economics justify the liberal management of science and health services? L’economia matematica giustifica la gestione liberale della scienza e dei servizi sanitari?».
If this article, with God’s blessing, exceeds 77 thousand views (those of the most read of the 10 “CoronaVirus Bio-arma” and 7 “WuhanGate” reports) we will launch a petition and we will take action to propose the French biologist as Secretary General of the UN. Because he has written down in a scientific document precisely the questions that all men and women of common sense and goodwill are asking themselves on earth!
I do not know, however, that the current head of the Glass Palace in New York, the Portuguese Antonio Guterres, has yet to respond to the appeal of the metropolitan cardinal of Sri Lanka, Malcom Ranjith to investigate “on this poison scattered from a rich country” or to the official request of the ex-president of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, for the establishment of a pandemic commission of inquiry, believed to be a bacteriological war by him like other US bio-weapon experts.
When Gospa News decided to retrieve and publish the contents of the first scientific study that demonstrated the presence of inserts of HIV in CoVid-19, therefore the genetic manipulation of the same virus, we knew we were going into the dark trusting only in the inspiration of the Holy Spirit and in the protection of Our Lady (Gospa in Medjugorie).
Because those researchers from the Kuzuma School of Biology, in New Delhi, had been the only ones to scientifically document this theory but then, within 24 hours, they had withdrawn the study although it seemed solid and flawless enough to push us into the risk of writing about it.
Two days after the publication of our report, thank God, the interview with Professor Luc Montagnier began to go viral, who from the height of his Nobel Prize not only supported Kuzuma’s research but openly said that those researchers were «forced to retract». Now Bricage restarts right from there before exposing his scientific evidence.
«In February 2020, a French mathematician, also an inter-disciplinary expert, emeritus engineer in computer science and researcher at the IBM Center for Research in Artificial Intelligence, at the University ofBordeaux, identifies into the genome of the isolated 2019-nCoV strain, patterns that break the symmetry ofthe usual genetic organization of a coronavirus (Perez, 2020)».
Bricage refers to the bio-mathematician Jean-Claude Perez, who joined Montagnier in his virological research, and therefore recalls that new information patterns were inserted into the gene encoding the envelope spike protein (protein S) and into the genes encoding the poly-protein which is at the origin of both the viral protease and polymerase, enzyme activities that are present in every coronavirus.
«These insertions were identical to the same information patterns found into the genome sequences of the similar proteins Open Reading Frames (ORF) of another well known RNA virus, the HIV» supports the expert molecular genetics engineer who, thanks to his intense activity as a lecturer also for NATO, manages to be a good communicator, making a difficult bio-chemical lexicon almost comprehensible.
«Meanwhile, a team of young computer scientists, from the Indian Institute of Technology in New Delhi,had uploaded a work, in bioRXiv, the open online archive, showing an unknown and totally uncanny similaritybetween the genomes of 2109-nCoV and HIV (Pradhan et al., 2020). The 2019-nCoV genome containedpatterns similar to some found in the HIV genome, in its envelope protein S and in its poly protease-polymerase genes pool; thus validating the previously published work of Perez (2020). How could identical genetic sequences be present in such different viruses?Was this an adaptive evolutionary convergence phenomenon? (Mills, 2006)».
In order to make the use of his research easier, the French professor asks himself a barrage of questions that are easy for a child to understand:: «How, in nature, could a set of similar mutations give the same functional result in genetic systems evolving within completely different hosts, (bats and humanoid primates)? Or, if it was a genetic transfer, how,in nature, were such targeted genetic recombinations possible (Bricage, March, April & May 2020)?».
«Afterwards, this unpublished article was withdrawn; cancelled without any specific comment. Simultaneously, the previously published work was framed as a fake news, while the 2019-nCoVbecame the SARS-CoV-2. Why so many troubles? What did the work of the Indian team show?» Bricage wonders again.
«If we compare the proteins S of the initial 2019-nCoV strain with those of the other coronaviruses, the amino acid islands observed in the homologue proteins sequences turn out to be thoroughly different. Couldthey result from point mutations in the corresponding nucleotide coding sequences?».
But the rarity of the mutations would not justify them according to the researcher… «As a whole, these inserts, preserved in all the first analyzed genomes, do represent less than 1% of every genome. This is much lessthan the rightfully expected overall genetic divergence with every coronaviruses, whose sequences are known. There is an astonishing similarity between the sites of cutting by the proteases: the same sites are present inthese proteins of both the coronavirus and the HIV (and also some influenza viruses). These sites are different from those of usual coronaviruses; either in wild reservoirs or vectors, wild or domestic vectors, or even inevery known humanized coronaviruses. How could a natural change of such magnitude, by viable and specificmutations, have affected only the cut-off sites, which represent less than 3% of the protein sequence?».
The biochemical engineer then goes into detail on the discovery of his Indian colleagues and adds his results: «Was the Wuhan coronavirus genetically transformed to look like the HIV? The changes observed in its protein sequences (3 inserts coming from gp120 HIV and 1 insert from HIV gag) all increase the density of positive charges on the surface of these molecules. Such a non-random change involves the use of a protein engineering software tool to screen the genetic modifications prior to doing them. Genomic inserts 1 and 2 in glycoprotein S (each of 18 nucleotides, each coding for 6 amino acids) are completely identical to the corresponding HIV sequences. The genomic inserts 3 (36 nucleotides corresponding to 12 amino acids) and 4 (24 nucleotides corresponding to 8 amino acids) also closely resemble the corresponding HIV sequences».
And finally here is the merciless sentence: «None of these 4 inserts may result from a random single-point mutation. This type of mutation usuallyaffects only 1 amino acid and not a defined protein pattern (a series of specifically changed amino acids). A point mutation can also cause a shift in the reading frame, but this usually results in a non-functional protein. Yet 2 of these inserts present a deletion (Su et al., 2020), an interruption, a partial break into their sequence,which not only retains the functionality but also specifically increases the density of the positive charges located at the surface of the active molecule. A deletion is usually lethal and results in a non-functional protein».
Even to a novice bio-chemist like me who spends hours reading scientific research only since the end of January to find a clue or useful evidence to confirm the theory of CoVid-19 Bio-Weapon (or even to deny it if I had found at least one robust study…) the “charge-positive” combination sounds distressing and makes think immediatly to bio-weapons…
So far we have deliberately reported excessively scientific details useful to highlight the analytical acribity of the molecular geneticist as opposed to the generic nature of the counter-deductions with which the study of those other scientists (Chinese but of the British school) sought to dismantle the results of Indian research.
They – we highlighted in our previous report on the matter – judged the HIV-1 sequences with “low identity and rarity” such as to be considered random as claimed by their other colleagues who contested the length of these segments.
However, this prompted the prompt reply of Montagnier, a former professor at the prestigious Pasteur Institute in Paris and today head of department at Jiao Tong University in Shanghai, in a long interview for CNEWS TV.
«We respond immediately these lengths however they are segments that carry genetic information contrary to those who say it is a coincidence. It is not so. There is enormous pressure for everything that is at the origin of the virus to be hidden» declared the winner of the Nobel Prize for Medicine
Bricage instead peremptorily attacks the denial colleagues of the theory of the genetically modified virus:: «Subsequently a team of Chinese researchers (Zhang et al., 2020) disqualified the role of these insertions through 3-D modeling of the interaction between the S protein and its target receptor ACE2 (Ge etal., 2013). The inserts are located outside the recognition site that binds to the receptor, so they would not have a functional effect».
«Isn’t writing this ignoring the fact that the functional properties of a protein emerge from the remote interactions between its different peptide modules, the different parts that make up the protein, the whole?» we do not have the skills to evaluate the validity of this rhetorical question but the arguments are certainly more detailed than those with which the other scientists contested the Kuzuma study.
The French bioengineer then exposes a further element of contradiction. «RNA viruses, such as coronaviruses, usually have a very high mutation rate: 10 times that of single-strand DNA viruses, 10,000 times that of other viruses and 100,000 times that of their eukaryotic host cells. This paramount rate implies a random accumulation of errors in the genome, which are usually unfavorable forthe virus survival. The existence of hot spots, where mutations are the most frequent, is well-known into every genome ».
Instead according to the researcher «that in the new coronavirus the exact opposite is observed in the evolution trend» in reference to the envelope protein (env).
But there is another factor as important as it is disturbing in the Bricage research’s conclusions: «The analysis of the evolution of the humanized viral populations showed the existence of at least 2subpopulations of SARS-CoV-2. The most frequent type, type L, both is the most recent and the most aggressive one. The oldest and least frequent type is also the least aggressive one. This is totally the opposite of the known natural genetic evolution of wild viruses».
This circumstance was highlighted with extreme amazement by another group of researchers from authoritative Chinese institutes (report CoronaVirus Bio-Weapon 4) in February, before the Beijing government forbade the publication of any study not previously screened and authorized.
«Isn’t the variable expression of the of SARS-CoV-2 phenotype the consequence of the variable expression of properties relative to both the phenotype of a weak, strong or intermediate HIV, or/and of properties relative to the phenotype ofa weak, strong or intermediate SARS-CoV? Doesn’t that explain the variety of symptoms observed during COVID-19?» the molecular genetics expert wonders, crediting a tremendous hypothesis well known and exposed in previous Gospa News investigations.
That is the probability, technically possible by virtue of the dangerous studies conducted by the 25 mysterious bio-labs of the agencies of the US State Department in various foreign countries, that pathogens with different virulence calibrated in the biogenetic footprint have been built in relation to the ethnic group to hit…
As we have shown in the Wuhangate 5 report in the Lugar Center in Georgia 79 human guinea-pigs died provoking the international indignation of Russia while in the CoronaVirus Bio-Weapon report 7 we remembered the death of soldiers that took place in Ukraine near the research center of the Pentagon of Kharkiv,
It is also clear that at the moment the countries most affected by lethal contagion are the most nationalist ones (China, USA, UK, Iran) or with populist-sovereignist parties in significant expansion (Italy, Spain).
The hypothesis that CoVid-19 is not only an arificial virus, not only is it a bio-weapon but also has a genetic-ethnic calibration is not senseless if we remember the existence of Deep State, recently confirmed even by a former CIA director during a public conference at an American university, who sometimes plots against his own nation as in the assassins of presidents Abraham Lincoln and John Fitzgerald Kennedy in the US and of statist Aldo Moro and judge Paolo Borsellino in Italy. All crimes made even more murky by sidings and cover-ups in investigations on the real instigators.
The arguments of the former professor of the University of Pau do not end here but go to analyze the therapies against CoVid-19, just as Gospa News did in the WuhanGate 2 report on Indian research, and he too highlights a surprising fact.
«As early as the 3rd of February 2020, the more severe cases in Wuhan were treated with combinations of drugs commonly used against flu (such as favipiravir, a guanine analogue, which is a RNA polymerase inhibitor of riboviruses) and AIDS (kaletra, acyclovir, ritonavir), or even with inhibitors of the HIV reversing transcriptase (remdesivir) – which is absent from coronaviruses» underlines with the usual precision also referring to Remdesivir, the drug that is making rich the big pharma Gilead, contractor of the Pentagon DTRA agency (Defense Threat Reduction Agency) that was operating in the Lugar center where there was the death of human guinea pigs.
This occurred during a plan to eradicate Hepatitis C in Georgia carried out as part of the UNITAID project, a global health initiative hosted at the WHO headquarters in Geneva that works with various partners to prevent, diagnose and treat major diseases. in low and middle income countries, with particular attention to tuberculosis, malaria and HIV / AIDS..
As highlighted in our previous Wuhangate 5 investigation on Gilead, UNITAID supporters include the Clinton Health Access Initiative and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. While among the partners there is also USAID, the link between research in the epidemiological field and the Central Intelligence Agency which has always been a financial instrument used also for the so-called regime-changes.
We close this indispensable parenthesis and return to Bricage’s considerations on therapies:: «Why such choices? The disease effectively responded to the treatment with these usual AIDS drugs and the Chinese hospital doctors have immediately used anti-AIDS drugs. Why? Therapeutic lucidity or social panic? Is it because the topology of the coronavirus protease has been modified to resemble that of HIV?».
The French professor hypothesizes that it is “a biomimetic coronavirus of HIV” which he himself mentioned in the “keywords” of the research also as GMO: genetically modified organism. And therefore the fateful question arises.
«Isn’t it possible to make a coronavirus biomimetic of HIV? Isn’t it technologically possible to modify an ancestor of SARS-CoV-2 to produce a biomimeticcoronavirus of HIV so as to develop a potential AIDS vaccine (Du et al., 2009)?» his answer is obvious and detailed.
«The 2003 SARS-CoV-1 andthe 2013 MERS were the subject of extensive research. The genetic and molecular engineering ofcoronaviruses has been the subject of numerous books (Canavagh, 2008) and publications with detailedlaboratory protocols (Becker et al., 2008). Many works about the construction of genetic chimeras have beenpublished and new patents registered (Baric et al., 2018). For over 20 years, North American researchers, butnot only (Amer et al., 2012), have been working on coronaviruses in domestic animals, such as cattle or pets». Of these we wrote in WuhanGate 7 and we will write in WuhanGate 9…
Chapeau a Bricage! Not only is he confirmed as a meticulous researcher but he also proves to be an excellent and effective reporter. It was a torture to cut many very relevant parts of his documents to condense two different studies of about ten pages each, supported by 27 citations from previous research.
By coincidence, there are also 27 SARS-Like chimeric viruses built in the laboratory and reported in a single research conducted by the Wuhan Institute of Virology which was funded with $ 3.7 million dollars by USAID’s PREDICT 2 project thanks to the contribution of EcoHealthAlliance of New York but also of the NIAID (National Institute Allergy Infectives Disease), the American institute for infectious diseases directed by the disputed Anthony Fauci, and by the World Health Organization.
Former White House consultant Francis Boyle (Bio-Weapon report 1) had already publicly accused the WHO of being perfectly aware of what happened in Wuhan. While Luc Professor Montagnier (WuhanGate 4 report) stated in front of CNEWS cameras that the pandemic “a deal between China and the USA”. Our investigations have revealed many intriguing even disconcerting intrigues between people and entities that would confirm this claim …
Precisely for this reason, in the last WuhanGate 7 reportage we mapped, thanks to a UNODA (United Nation Office of Disarmament Affairs) document, the mysterious and dangerous laboratories of the Pentagon in the US, also referring to some research on the genetic manipulations of CoronaViruses for the construction of pathogens “recombinant” or obtained by grafting one virus into another: as according to Bricage it would have happened for SARS-Cov-2 with HIV.
In the next WuhanGate 9 reportage we will see all the research on the genetically modified and infected with HIV SARS strains developed in the world and especially in China. Even with the financial support of a western institution which until yesterday I believed was extraneous to the international intrigue that lies behind the pandemic.
Every day more and more this apocalyptic hecatomb appears as a demonic conspiracy of the Deep International State for the realization of a New World Order, as desired by a former deputy director of the CIA, through new geopolitical scenarios and a global vaccination plan as components of an occult anthropological and social engineering project far more terrible than biological and molecular one. (subscribe to the Gospa News newsletter to receive the next reports just published).
Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
© COPYRIGHT GOSPA NEWS – for VETERANS TODAY only
no reproduction without authorization – original post