Jewish slave-owners exempt from attacks by BLM?

by Phil Giraldi, …with The Unz Review

[ Editor’s Note: Phil takes us into a banned area of American history, the starting and control over the NAACP’s early years, and later the battle between black and Jewish academics on how the legacy of Jewish involvement in the slave trade would be treated.

The Jews were the victors, with their participation being airbrushed out of the textbooks and classrooms. Like VT, Phil is an iconoclast, willing to take on issues that are deemed too delicate to write about without career and censorship repercussions.

But in fact this topic does get covered by those wanting to do the historical research. I visited topics like this frequently in my Jim Dean Journal public tv shows in Atlanta, on the Jim Dean Journal, a knockoff of the hour long Charley Rose show.

I wove lots of authoritative quotes into my controversial material, which made me bullet proof from smear accusations. I used the same style when dealing with delicate Zionism and Israel Lobby controversy, where any criticism triggered a modern lynching response where you would be strung up as a hatemeister, heaven forbid.

In the backdrop of my video interviews, the middle library section is full of Judaica books with lots of dog eared pages and yellow highlighting to speed up looking for key quotes. I used to do show openings with a three minute commentary, borrowed from the old days when major network opened the news with the anchor’s commentary.

I believe that Phil’s motivation writing this is his knack for showing once again, while historical revisionism is generally fair game on all groups, as in tearing down monuments to anyone honored during the slave days, that Jews will be exempted.

But that is when I am for an equality for all mankind, insisting that they should not be discriminated against like that.

My favorite hidden slavery story, discovered in a Barbados library, was the niche that Bajan Jewish slave traders took over, buying sick slaves off the boats who were presumed to be terminal and were sold cheap.

The Jewish buyers nursed them back to health, most of the time, and then sold them for a nice ten times profit. Some might consider this ruthless exploitation, but the descendants of those slaves in Barbados might disagree.

They are proud of their heritage, more so than those of the Irish exported to work in Barbados, where the descendants were called ‘redlegs’ for being prone to sunburn. When I was there, they generally lived a subsistence lifestyle, raiding neighbors’ produce gardens to sell at the numerous roadside stands.

While Irish sold as servants in the US and to English Caribbean colonies is well documented, but suppressed in MSM. The trick they use to duck the truth is by not telling you that the terms slave and servants were synonyms at the time.

Oliver Cromwell kicked off the nasty business without a whiff of remorse, and later the sugar planters bred Irish women with black slaves as the lighter skinned children sold at much higher prices.

“In 1649, Cromwell landed in Ireland and attacked Drogheda, slaughtering some 30,000 Irish living in the city. Cromwell reported: “I do not think 30 of their whole number escaped with their lives. Those that did are in safe custody in the Barbados.” A few months later, in 1650, 25,000 Irish were sold to planters in St. Kitt.

During the 1650s decade of Cromwell’s Reign of Terror, over 100,000 Irish children, generally from 10 to 14 years old, were taken from Catholic parents and sold as slaves in the West Indies, Virginia and New England. In fact, more Irish were sold as slaves to the American colonies and plantations from 1651 to 1660 than the total existing “free” population of the Americas!” (from the link above)

…Another 30,000 Irish men and women were taken prisoners and ordered transported and sold as slaves. In 1656, Cromwell’s Council of State ordered that 1000 Irish girls and 1000 Irish boys be rounded up and taken to Jamaica to be sold as slaves to English planters.’

History has a tendency for being subjected to as much spin as can be found in political campaigns, with partially educated Donald Trump being the most recent example. Phil will fill you in on the rest.

Two books I would recommend, the first, for a quick study is Michael Hoffman’s They were white and They were Slaves, worth the price for the index alone, from which he pulled the gems from to do his.

And the the bible on the slave trade is Hugh Thomas’ 900 page tome, The Slave Trade, 1997, a 33 year effort for which humanity should be grateful for the incredible compilation, which includes me.Jim W. Dean ]

Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>

The White Slave of Barbados

– First published … June 30, 2020

The current wrath directed against anything or anyone having had anything to do with slavery or even racial discrimination includes destroying historical memorials and monuments as well as changing names that have stood for more than a century.

Much of it has been focused on white nominally Christian males, mostly of Anglo-Saxon stock, understandable as the United States was a child of Great Britain and a majority of the country’s leaders for nearly two centuries came from families descended from the British Isles.

Slavery in the United States version is, of course, seen in black and white terms but slavery in a broader historical context is much more complicated. There have been slaves since ancient times through the eighteenth century in many countries and most of them have been white.

Sometimes they were called something different. Indentured servants were de facto slaves, as were the serfs in Russia, who were tied to the land and were not liberated until 1861.

The very word slave comes from Slav, as many of the slaves in the Middle Ages were from the Slavic parts of the Balkans bordering on the Adriatic, where mostly Muslim seagoing raiders would attack coastal villages and carry off the inhabitants. Italy was likewise afflicted and the numerous small castles and improvised forts along the Italian and Croatian coastlines were intended to providing a refuge for villagers against the corsair slavers.

In the United States currently progressives of all types and colors are flocking to the revolutionary banner hoisted by Black Lives Matter (BLM) and other associated groups. Not surprisingly, given the liberal leanings of American Jews as well as their historical connections, Jewish groups have been actively engaged in the ongoing movement for racial justice.

American Jews have played major roles historically in the founding and financial support of some of the most important civil rights organizations, including the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC).

In 1909, Henry Moscowitz was a co-founder the NAACP. Photos of the boards of directors of the various organizations well into the 1970s frequently reveal a majority of white Jews seated together with minority blacks. Kivie Kaplan was, for example, the national president of the NAACP between 1966 and 1975.

But this characterization of Jews as benefactors for the civil rights movement has also produced some curious omissions in the accepted historical narrative of who did what to whom in the slavery trade. It is well established, though never taught in schools, that Jews from Britain and Holland were involved in the African slave trade that prevailed after the European discovery of the Americas.

In the United States, concentrations of Jews in the American south were in slave trading centers, notably in Charleston South Carolina, Savannah Georgia, Richmond Virginia and in New Orleans Louisiana. Many of the Jews themselves owned slaves.

The debate over Jewish involvement in both the business side of the slave trade as well as in actually possessing slaves comes down to “proportionality.” As the historical record makes clear that Jews in the south were engaged in both the importing and selling slaves as well as exploiting slave labor, the question becomes whether they were central to the process or just one of many identifiable groups that were peripherally involved in what was a major segment of the southern economy.

The issue became extremely heated in the 1990s when mostly black academics argued that the Jewish role was pivotal while mostly Jewish professors responded that it was insignificant.

In March 1995 the American Historical Association (AHA) got involved by issuing its first ever “policy resolution”, coming strongly down on the Jewish side of the argument, which should surprise no one. AHA argued that it was wrong to use historical analysis to vilify one group before citing a memo by two Jewish professors which asserted that the role of their co-religionists had been marginal.

For those who are interested in more on the discussion, the following article might be helpful, though it is on a Jewish website, cites only Jewish sources for it debunking of the idea that Jews might have been heavily engaged in the slave trade, and also brings in the most disreputable sources that say the contrary. It nevertheless concedes that Jews were involved in the slave trade and also possessed slaves, though it seeks to minimize the extent to which that was true.

Much more interesting is a short book by a distinguished Wellesley History Professor Tony Martin “The Jewish Onslaught: Despatches from the Wellesley Battlefront.” Martin describes in some detail how he was subjected to a “hysterical campaign” by Jewish organizations and fellow academics to have him discredited and fired after he assigned to his class on African-American history a short reading on the Jewish role in antebellum slavery.

Be that as it may, everyone should be aware that delving around in the past can be a messy business with no easy answers and little in the way of lines drawn between right and wrong. But in this case, the current unrest brings one around to a chap named Judah Benjamin.

Judah was born in the West Indies to a British-Jewish family before winding up in Charleston and eventually New Orleans, where he became a lawyer and made a fortune. He was elected to the U.S. Senate from Louisiana. Among other investments, he owned a sugar cane plantation that included 140 slaves.

In March of 1861, Benjamin was named Attorney General of the Confederacy by President Jefferson Davis, whom Benjamin knew from the Senate. Davis would sometimes say that Benjamin was “the brains of the Confederacy.” That same year, Benjamin was also named Confederate Secretary of War, a post that he later resigned to become Secretary of State, a position that he held for the remainder of the conflict. It was the second most powerful position in Richmond’s Confederate bureaucracy.

When the Confederacy fell, Benjamin fled to London and eventually to Paris, where he rebuilt his fortune by again practicing law. Benjamin died in Paris in 1884 at the age of 72. He was buried in the Paris Père Lachaise cemetery with a simple headstone inscribed “Phillipe Benjamin.” In 1936, the United Daughters of the Confederacy paid for a monument to be placed over his grave.

So, the question becomes, with BLM and other wreckers trying to destroy America’s historical monuments, to include those commemorating the Founding Fathers, Union Commander Ulysses S. Grant, Abraham Lincoln, Christopher Columbus, Catholic saint Junipero Serra and even abolitionist Hans Christian Heg, why is it that Judah Benjamin has somehow been missed?

He was a slave owner and worked as a lawyer in New Orleans where there was a thriving slave market as well as an economy built around cotton exports, which were driven by slave labor. He eventually became the number two man in the southern Confederacy, which is being regularly denounced as fighting a war to maintain slavery.

Well, of course the answer is quite simple. No politician or journalist who wants to stay employed would dare to publicly link Jews and slavery. BLM is also extravagantly funded by various guilt ridden foundations and other folks who are no doubt sensitive to the fact that there are certain issues that cannot be raised, and the people with their hands out know perfectly well what they can and cannot do or say to keep the money flowing.

For what it’s worth, there are a few monuments to Judah Benjamin sitting around just waiting to be trashed. In 1948, Charlotte, North Carolina’s two Jewish congregations, Temple Israel and Temple Bethel, erected a marker on South Tyron Street at the site of the demolished house of merchant Abraham Weil where Judah Benjamin and Jefferson Davis found shelter in April 1865 as they fled the northern army. To their credit, the congregations are now seeking to have the memorial removed.

Also of note is the 5-foot-high pink marble column topped by a sundial located in Sarasota, Florida at the point where Benjamin escaped from the United States. The monument is inscribed “Near this spot on June 23, 1865, Judah P. Benjamin, Secretary of State of the United Confederacy, set sail for a foreign shore.”

Yet another stone marker is located at 9 West Main Street in Richmond, Virginia, identifying the location of Benjamin’s residence during the Civil War. Another stone marker can be found in Fayetteville, North Carolina. It recalls how Benjamin “attended Fayetteville Academy on this site.”

There is still another stone monument in Bradenton Florida erected by the Judah P. Benjamin chapter of the Daughters of the Confederacy and in North Carolina there is a Highway Historical Marker Program plaque that marks the site of Benjamin’s no longer existing boyhood home.

But the most impressive historic site commemorating Benjamin’s legacy is the Judah P. Benjamin Confederate Memorial at Gamble Plantation in the town of Ellenton, Florida, south of St. Petersburg. The historic site is maintained as a state park by the Florida Department of Natural Resources and also by the Judah P. Benjamin Chapter No. 1545 of the United Daughters of the Confederacy.

It is the only surviving antebellum plantation in central and south Florida and includes the mansion and gardens as well as a visitors’ center. A large bronze memorial plaque commemorates Benjamin. Nevertheless, the connection with Benjamin is admittedly tenuous as he only sought refuge there briefly in 1865 during his flight to England.

Philip M. Giraldi, Ph.D., is Executive Director of the Council for the National Interest, a 501(c)3 tax deductible educational foundation (Federal ID Number #52-1739023) that seeks a more interests-based U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. Website is https://councilforthenationalinterest.org, address is P.O. Box 2157, Purcellville VA 20134 and its email is [email protected].

Biography
Managing Editor
Jim W. Dean is Managing Editor of Veterans Today involved in operations, development, and writing, plus an active schedule of TV and radio interviews. Read Full Complete Bio >>>

Jim W. Dean Archives 2009-2014
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

8 COMMENTS

  1. Like most “Holohox” stories these numbers do not stack up. The one fact most people forget is the number of people carried on a ship of that time is limited by how much water and beer the ship can carry. The voyage is what 6-10 weeks , the water will not last much beyond the first 2 weeks before it goes off then it will be down to the beer or ale. The aim of the trip is to get as many slaves to North America or Caribbean so you need to take care of them , that means you need to give them plenty of fluids at least a 2 litres per person per day plus their food. A barrel contains up to 200 litres so if you have 100 slaves you are going through a barrel a day. For a 6 weeks voyage that’s 42 barrels of fluid for 10 weeks 70 barrels. That does not include the crew and guards. I would surmise that about 100 is as good a number of slaves as you would carry on a voyage. Still terrible but as Sir Richard Burton pointed out in A Mission to Gelele, King of Dahome in 1864, if Gelele could not sell them he would just kill them as he could not afford to feed his captives from his many wars. That’s the trouble of changing history to match the prejudice of today .

  2. “In his 2003 book Christian Slaves, Muslim Masters: White Slavery in the Mediterranean, the Barbary Coast and Italy, 1500–1800, Ohio State University history professor Robert Davis states that most modern historians minimize the white slave trade. Davis estimates that slave traders from Tunis, Algiers, and Tripoli alone enslaved 1 million to 1.25 million Europeans in North Africa, from the beginning of the 16th century to the middle of the 18th (these numbers do not include the European people who were enslaved by Morocco and by other raiders and traders of the Mediterranean Sea coast).[3] Roughly 700 Americans were held captive in this region as slaves between 1785 and 1815.”

  3. Jim
    You may read this for more enlightenment: Eli Faber – Jews, Slaves, and the Slave Trade: Setting the Record Straight!!!

    • Thanks for this Rana, I had not run across that one. I will google to see if some used ones are around to add to my collection, although reading books has been hard with my decade with VT where online reading sucks up almost all reading time. I use my books mainly as a reference library now, and for good quotes.

    • Jim
      I’ve sent 9 pdf books on slavery at your email address along with Eli Faber one for your kind reference.
      Hope they’ll be of some use.
      From an avid reader of VT for some years
      Bangladesh

  4. The Irish slave trade was indeed horrendous but Mr. Martin plays loose and free with his facts which is a pity because with so much factual information at his fingertips he still managed to botch his facts. If I was Jewish I would have been rankled by him too. “One British ship even dumped 1,302 slaves into the Atlantic Ocean so that the crew would have plenty of food to eat.” This can only have been the story of the African slave ship “Zong”that captured the mind of not only the British public but resulted in a celebrated painting by Turner (1775-1851). The incident occurred in late November/early December 1781. One hundred and thirty two Africans (132) were thrown overboard and not 1,302 as exaggerated by Martin. It is a small point but he sets himself and the entire Irish slavery issue up to ridicule by his stupidity and poor editing. He also blamed Catholic pro-Irish King James 11 by poor editing of shipping Irish slaves to the Caribbean when it was his father James 1 in 1625 who was responsible. I met a fellow student by the name of Carney Lee from Monserrat devastated by a volcano back in the 80’s I believe – an Irish name if ever there was, yet the guy of Irish/African ancestry had a lilting voice and bright eyes and regaled the Creative Writing class at CCNY (Convent Avenue, Harlem) with an hilarious story about Caribbean cockroaches invading New York only to the stomped en masse. Flying kites is a popular past-time on the island.

    • I watched several of Martin’s lectures on Youtube a few years ago and he gets to the right conclusion but as you point out, he is far too sloppy in his research, which sadly undermines the veracity of his conclusion in the eyes of critics. Just the mere thought of a wooden sailing ship big enough to actually carry 1,300 slaves plus crew boggles the mind, an extremely big wooden sailing ship is only around 3000 tonnes, slave ships were usually carrying a few hundred slaves, not thousands, I doubt any ship ever carried 1,300 slaves across the Atlantic.

    • Also, wooden ships start to bend if you make them too long and setting the sails requires too many men, the really big wooden ships of the 19th century had steam windlasses for handling sails.

Comments are closed.