Watch FFWN above (and observe a lot!) Click HERE for the story links.

Will Trump steal the election? Or will he lose, then refuse to go gentle into that good night?

Will Bibi and Trump conclude their only hope of staying in power, and out of prison, lies in a big war with Iran?

Will Trump and Biden hold the usual pre-election debates, or will they do a joint senility test instead?

Will economic collapse, COVID, and off-the-charts corruption finish off what’s left of the Republic this year, or will we have to wait a while longer?

These are some of the questions considered in this week’s False Flag Weekly News.

Guest host Atty. Thomas Willcutts has a degree in Bio-physics from Rice University and experience litigating science and engineering issues in court. He specializes in representing individuals in securities fraud cases against the major banks of Wall Street.  Willcutts has had a life-long interest in political philosophy, and he frequently engages in on-line debates and discussions on this topic, several of which can be found on YouTube, including here, here, and here. Tom is the lead partner in the law firm Willcutts & Habib, LLC.

Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.

He is host of TRUTH JIHAD RADIO; a hard driving weekly radio show funded by listener donations at and FALSE FLAG WEEKLY NEWS (FFWN); a audio-video show produced by Tony Hall, Allan Reese, and Kevin himself. FFWN is funded through FundRazr.

He also has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.

Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin; where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. Time for a “people’s” audit of the present system’s books, parameters, efficiencies, and the benefits provided to people of the united states of America over the last one hundred years.
    Here is a good place to start.

    BTW the Federal Reserve was given the exclusive franchise to administer America’s money ” in perpetuity “

  2. Money, as an instrument of value exchange, serves a valid function. And the creation of money as a tool to facilitate exchanges of value is also a valid function.
    The nub of the issue, is that money once it is created, has an inherent value. And the creator of the money has great power, in that the money, as we know it, is created from nothing.
    Therefore that great power of money creation was reserved, in the name of the people, for the people as a commonwealth of state, in the U.S. Treasury, representing the aggregate of all the people.
    The ideal was for the Treasury to create the money, and loan it into existence, much as it is today by the private Federal Reserve. But instead of a private entity reaping the wealth of first ownership of the newly created money, the People through their agent, The U.S. Treasury would be the first owners of the money, by virtue of their Constitutionally created Treasury being the vehicle of its creation.
    In essence, the Treasury was to have been a Bank of the people; All the people!
    Since all loans, from the people to the people, would bear little to no interest; whenever the loans were repaid, the wealth of the Treasury, and the commonwealth of the people, would increase.
    The responsibility and business of the U.S. Treasury, was to have been the institution of, and the running of the entire U.S. banking system.
    Granted, there are intricacies, and delicate issues involved in bringing a system like this to fruition, but no more so than in any other monetary system.; and most likely a lot less, since the greed and negative effects of usury would be removed.
    The principle of the matter, is that the fiat money would belong to the Treasury, and the Treasury would belong to the people.
    All the people.

Comments are closed.