This article, of the dozen or so VT has done on the nuclear attack on Beirut, was erased from the VT site with 8 others by hackers…from Russia.
Why? Is this why? VT was attacked today around the world including on the front page of the Los Angeles Times, at best a disgusting shopping guide level rag.
Running scared with the ammonium nitrate lie, or rather Scotts Turf Builder, a great fertilizer. It can’t burn, it can’t explode but in Beirut we are told it blew a 594 foot crater 40 feet deep in solid granite, something only done once before, by a hydrogen bomb. That hole is not so far from Las Vegas.
We start with the text below in response to a Russia Today video where a so-called explosives expert explained Beirut. RT has become quite unreliable for the past year, a distinct pro-Israel bias, has repeatedly attacked Syria’s President Assad and is backing racist-supremacist elements in the US.
RT cleaned this off, which reports the Israeli bombers at 30 seconds onward:
We also burn Rick Sanchez as a fake anti-Zionst who went to RT because of equally fake media prosecution. We recognize the “OP,” which we believe Snowden is as well, certainly Wikileaks but, under the blanket of Google/YouTube-Facebook disinformation and censorship, the selling of a fake narrative has become so reliable that nuclear terrorism is becoming a “go to” for Israel, Saudi Arabia and, of course, the US.
We begin by debunking ammonium nitrate with a detailed explanation from a mining engineer explaining how the cover story is absurd. Simply put, you can’t make ammonium nitrate by itself explode, it simply burns.
And this is what a fireworks explosion looks like:
The massive Chinese explosion was an explosive slurry, not fertilizer grade ammonium nitrate. From here we cover issues of the use of tactical nuclear weapons and present a reasonable assertion that Lebanon was nuked in 2006. We begin with a mining demolition engineer with decades of experience:
“Now listen carefully, it takes a TNT detonation to initiate or ignite a load of Anfo, Hanfo or Magnafrac. What I mean by that is that for Anfo to detonate, it needs the violence of a TNT initiation before it itself will actually detonate. I’ve watched Anfo catch fire and burn numerous times.
It won’t explode, it will just burn. And if doesn’t have the diesel fuel mixture it won’t even do that. Ammonia Nitrate is a commercial fertilizer. The company employees were each given two twenty Kilo bags of Ammonia Nitrate every spring to fertilize their lawns. It will quite literally turn a brown lawn a vibrant green over night…”
He next describes listening to an interview on the Beirut warehouse fire where he became ‘spin’ suspicious, or if you will allow me to create a new word, ‘spincious’.
“I have to say I disagree with this gentleman. The moment he hesitated to answer the very first ‘yes’ or ‘no’ question posed to him when asked if a match tossed on a pile of ammonia nitrate would initiate a catastrophic explosion, he hesitated for a few seconds before answering and I knew immediately that whatever he was going to say was maybe a bit cloudy and opaque.
I’ve worked in the open pit mining industry all my life as a surveyor and a blasting technician. For my last two years at a large open pit coal operation in the British Columbia foothills, my job was designing the blast patterns and deciding which explosive product to load into the drill holes.
We used ANFO, a mixture of ammonia nitrate and diesel fuel. The AN stands for ammonia nitrate and FO stands for fuel oil or diesel fuel. We used a product called HANFO or what is called heavy anfo. It was called heavy anfo because it had a higher concentration of diesel fuel in it’s mixture, hence the term Heavy anfo.
Both anfo and heavy anfo have to be used in dry holes. If the holes are wet, the diesel component would wash out and the ammonia nitrate by itself would not ignite.
In those instances we would line the drill holes with plastic liners and then load the anfo or heavy anfo into the plastic liners. If it still proved too wet, we went to a very expensive product called Magnafrac. It was a slurry based emulsion that was more or less water proof, but still, if left to sit too long, the slurry would decompose and fail to ignite.
Heavy anfo has a higher power factor than regular anfo. That means more bang for the buck or more explosive energy. The name of the game was always to blast the most amount of rock with the least amount of actual product loaded. This is called the powder factor. The lower you can keep the powder factor and still break the host rock, the cheaper the cost. Anfo cheapest, hanfo, more expensive, Magnafrac very expensive which drove the powder factor up. The goal was to maintain a balance.
I’ve handled all of these products, loaded them, helped the blast crew tie the pattern in with DET cord and basically pulled the trigger. We used blasting wire connected to a blasting machine like you see in the old movies where the bad guys are trying to blow up railroad tracks. In the early 90’s, the wire and blasting machine was replaced with a much more efficient system we called non-electric blasting.
There was no electric charge produced to run down the yellow blasting wire to the DET cord and initiate the blast.
What was used was a product called ‘shock tube’. It was a small diameter hollow plastic tubing about 3 or 4 millimeters in diameter that had a very small powdery dusting of an explosive called ‘pentlandite’ a type of your basic TNT. It was called shock tube for a reason because it was non-electric.It is basically a fundamental shock wave generator, (shock tubes) either compressed air-driven or detonation-driven). It produces a ‘blast shock wave’. This is the lead shock wave that then in turn initiates the DET cord, then the explosive.
To initiate the detonation there was a small, for lack of a better word, I will say clacker, that you could step on. The non electric energy released when the clacker was stepped on was sufficient to ignite the very minute amount of powdered explosive in the shock tube that ran and initiated the DET cord which of course ran into each drilled hole filled with the actual explosive product used in the blast pattern itself.
Now here is where the rubber meets the road. Up until now we are talking inert elements and components that combined or by themselves couldn’t blow up a box of Kleenex.
The key to all this were the 500 gram TNT detonators placed at the bottom of each drill hole at the bottom of the explosives. We generally used 2 500 gram TNT detonators per hole.
That is where the ignition took place. Now listen carefully, it takes a TNT detonation to initiate or ignite a load of Anfo, Hanfo or Magnafrac. What I mean by that is that for Anfo to detonate, it needs the violence of a TNT initiation before it itself will actually detonate. I’ve watched Anfo catch fire and burn numerous times.
It won’t explode, it will just burn. And if doesn’t have the diesel fuel mixture it won’t even do that. Ammonia Nitrate is a commercial fertilizer. The company employees were each given two twenty Kilo bags of Ammonia Nitrate every spring to fertilize their lawns. It will quite literally turn a brown lawn a vibrant green over night. That practice was discontinued in about 1993, at least at the mine I was employed at during that time span.
An automobile or truck perhaps running at speed, exploding and slamming into a mound of anfo etc. might be able to deliver the explosive force necessary to detonate the explosive product. Or the shock wave required. (or a missile or bomb)
We used to make the ammonia nitrate prills off mine site at a facility that was used by the explosive company that provided all the explosive product to our site. This is a huge, explosive company that is global in scope. And I will add that in all my time working with them and handling the various products, they/we used, they had a stellar safety record.
I’ve probably missed a lot and/or left out some information but this is all that I can recall to mind without having to refer to my various texts and notes.
So were there pumps, in this storage facility, was there fuel oil saturating the ammonia nitrate that gradually was absorbed over time?
Absolutely no disrespect meant or directed to Mr. Basulto or Mr. Sanchez.”
VT: Israel hit Hezbollah with an advanced tactical nuclear weapon in 2006 according to Russian military experts. Today Russia sides with Israel and is suspected of running Donald Trump as a shill. While Israel bombs Syria daily, Netanyahu prances around Moscow like a Czar.
TruPublica: A thermonuclear weapon weighing little more than 2,400 pounds (1,100 kg) can produce an explosive force comparable to the detonation of more than 1.2 million tons of TNT. A nuclear device no larger than traditional bombs can devastate an entire city by blast, fire, and radiation. Nuclear weapons are considered weapons of mass destruction, and their use and control has been a major focus of international relations policy since their debut.
The Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons, commonly known as the Non-Proliferation Treaty or NPT, is an international treaty whose objective is to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and weapons technology, to promote cooperation in the peaceful uses of nuclear energy, and to further the goal of achieving nuclear disarmament and general and complete disarmament.
Five states have signed up to NPT, the US, UK, Russia, France and China. Between them, they have declared 22,000 nuclear weapons in stock. These five Nuclear Weapons States (NWS) have made undertakings not to use their nuclear weapons against a non-NWS party except in response to a nuclear attack. India, Pakistan and N.Korea have also declared stocks of nuclear weapons. Israel is widely known to have nuclear weapons but does not declare it and has therefore not signed up to the NPT treaty.
As of 2009, only the US is known to have provided nuclear weapons for sharing. Germany, Belgium, Netherlands, Italy and Turkey are still hosting U.S. nuclear weapons as part of NATO’s nuclear sharing policy. Canada and Greece withdrew and no longer participate.
However, the USA sticks to the old policy that goes back to 1945 – to monopolise the right to use nuclear weapons by making their non-proliferation part of international law in combination with new restrictive measures against others.
In his book Towards a World War III Scenario: The Dangers of Nuclear War Michel Chossudovsky tells us about the interconnection between the Pentagon and US corporations. The book says the US Congress okay’d the use of tactical nuclear weapons in non-conventional wars in 2003. According to congressmen, it was quite “safe for civilians”.
In intensive warfare conditions, up-to-date tactical nuclear weapons can create an illusion of their absence on the battlefield when used together with conventional weapons. For instance, according to Russian military experts, nuclear munitions of a new generation were used in Lebanon in 2006 during the operation against the Hezbollah. The soil samples taken from craters had traces of enriched uranium. At the same time, there was no gamma radiation and isotope of caesium 137 resulting from radioactive decay. The radiation level was high inside the craters but went down approximately by half at the distance of just a few meters away.
According to U.S. military sources, the first detonation of a nuclear weapon against another country since 1945 took place approximately 11 miles east of Basra, Iraq sometime between February 2 and February 5, 1991.
By then, Iraq’s former capitol had been declared a “free fire on zone” – open to carpet-bombing by high-flying formations of eight-engine B-52s. “Basra is a military town in the true sense,” military spokesman General Richard Neal told the press. “The infrastructure, military infrastructure, is closely interwoven within the city of Basra itself.”
Though the soon-to-be fired General Neal claimed there were no civilians left in Basra, the city was actually sheltering some 800,000 terrified residents. In direct violation of Article 51 of the Geneva Protocols, which prohibits area bombing, the B-52s commenced saturation grid-bombing of the city. Mixing fuel-air bombs with shrapnel-spraying cluster bombs, the bombers levelled entire city blocks, the Los Angeles Times reported, leaving “bomb craters the size of football fields, and an untold number of casualties.” [Washington Post Feb 2/91; Los Angeles Times Feb 5/91]
With the city of Basra resounding to gigantic explosions and engulfed in “a hellish nighttime of fires and smoke so dense that witnesses say the sun hasn’t been clearly visible for several days at a time,” a 5-kiloton GB-400 nuclear bomb exploding 11 miles away under the desert attracted no notice.
Under the cover of massive Depleted Uranium tipped bombs that raised dirty mushroom clouds in thunderous explosions that rained radioactive dust over Jalalabad and nearby villages, the first nuclear bombs dropped since Basra in 1991 were detonated by American forces in Afghanistan beginning in March 2002.
Before their field tests were concluded, United States forces would explode four 5-kiloton GBU-400 nuclear bombs in Tora Bora and other mountainous regions of Afghanistan and was so powerful that it actually created an earthquake there.
The use of such lethal weapons by US military, which is a gross violation of the Geneva Convention, has been sanctioned by both US presidents Bush and Obama; thus they should be prosecuted for war crimes, as it is nothing less than a nuclear war.
The classification of DU munitions as weapons of indiscriminate effect is defined in the 1st Protocal additional to the Geneva Conventions. Their use is a war crime.
The US military contends that “mini-nukes” are “humanitarian bombs” which minimize “collateral damage”. According to scientific opinion on contract to the Pentagon, they are “harmless to the surrounding civilian population because the explosion is underground.”
The B61-11 is a bon fide thermonuclear bomb, a Weapon of Mass Destruction (WMD) in the real sense of the word.
Military documents distinguish between the Nuclear Earth Penetrator (NEP) and the “mini-nuke”, which are nuclear weapons with a yield of less than 10 kilotons (two-thirds of a Hiroshima bomb). The NEP can have a yield of up to a 1000 kilotons, or seventy times a Hiroshima bomb.
This distinction between mini-nukes and the NEP is in many regards misleading. In practice, there is no dividing line. We are broadly dealing with the same type of weaponry: the B61-11 has several “available yields”, ranging from “low yields” of less than one kiloton, to mid-range, and up to the 1000-kiloton bomb.
In all cases, the radioactive fallout is devastating. Moreover, the B61 series of thermonuclear weapons includes several models with distinct specifications: the B61-11, the B61-3, B61- 4, B61-7 and B61-10. Each of these bombs has several “available yields”.
The latest in the series, the B61-12 is classed by many as the most dangerous nuclear weapon ever due to it being the first guided missile with dial-in yields making proliferation a real threat.
What is contemplated for the theatre of war use is the “low yield” 10 kt bomb, two-thirds of a Hiroshima bomb. What allows it to happen is the disinformation and propaganda issued that these weapons are somehow not really nuclear weapons – they are.
Depleted uranium has a half-life of 4.5 billion years and has thus earned the title “The silent killer that will never stop killing”.
These weapons are called ‘micro-nukes’ as if somehow that makes it better or legal. We know that tactical nuclear weapons or mini-nukes are part of the US-NATO arsenal and that they were cleared for use in the conventional war theatre by the US Senate in 2002. Rather bizarrely, these weapons can be used without the approval of the Commander in Chief.
As prof. Chossudovsky from Global Research asserts “the “evidence” of a nuclear attack against Yemen (see video) remains unconfirmed, the use of mini-nukes against countries in the Middle East has been on the Pentagon’s drawing board for almost 20 years. In 1996 under the Clinton administration, the B61-11 tactical nuclear weapon was slated to be used by the US in an attack against Libya.”
Nuclear weapons will now proliferate as a direct result of American use. It is known that Israel enjoys the luxury of around 80 nuclear weapons, deliverable with great precision to any spot in Iran from land, air or sea. This is especially so considering it is not a signatory of the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
As the conflict in Syria rages on, concerns emerge as a result of the use of depleted uranium shells (DU) in Iraq. This from bandepleteduranium.org – 1/2/2015 – Citizens of Raqqa in Northern Syria, are concerned over the long-term impact of the growing number of strikes by Coalition forces on their city and nearby villages.
In a report to the United Nations on DU, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) warned that: “in a post-conflict environment, the presence of depleted-uranium residues further increases the anxiety of local populations”. The collective experience of communities grappling with the public health and environmental legacy of conflict, and the known or suspected presence of radioactive materials, is a contagious cocktail that can have a lasting psychological impact on the memory of people. These concerns have now spread to Syria.
It appears that Israel has used DU rounds as widely reported in Jamraya, Syria. It is just a matter of time before we find out which other country has been contaminating Syria. So awful are these weapons the international community has tried, in vain, towards an outright ban of their future use.
The collapse of Russia’s relationship with the West in the last five years has ended hopes of further progress of non-proliferation as the super-powers intend on upgrading and increasing their weapons systems and nuclear arsenals.
Pakistan is now deploying short-range battlefield nuclear weapons designed to deter Indian tank columns. Only four months ago, General Khalid Kidwai, the former director of Pakistan’s powerful Strategic Plans Division, the country’s main nuclear planning body, declared that Pakistan’s nukes “are not seen as separate weapons”, but are “very much integrated” with conventional forces.
To recap – nuclear weapons, whether under the guise of ‘depleted uranium munitions, ‘mini-nukes, ‘bunker busters’ are quite simply nuclear weapons that leave a legacy of long-term death and destruction.
The UN used nuclear weapons in Libya HERE – The use of Depleted Uranium in Libya has been certified by a group of independent scientists.
Nuclear weapons use and it’s deadly effects HERE. Nuclear weapons use in Iraq is already devastating families experiencing profound congenital birth defects HERE and HERE
NATO itself, refuses to cooperate with investigations of war crimes and indiscriminate use of illegal weapons systems HERE and HERE
Type “congenital birth defects nuclear weapons Iraq” into Google images for a truly horrific gallery of misery emerges.
Gordon Duff posted articles on VT from 2008 to 2022. He is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War. A disabled veteran, he worked on veterans and POW issues for decades.
Gordon is an accredited diplomat and is generally accepted as one of the top global intelligence specialists. He manages the world’s largest private intelligence organization and regularly consults with governments challenged by security issues.
Duff has traveled extensively, is published around the world, and is a regular guest on TV and radio in more than “several” countries. He is also a trained chef, wine enthusiast, avid motorcyclist, and gunsmith specializing in historical weapons and restoration. Business experience and interests are in energy and defense technology.
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming educated opinion. In addition, to get a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media, please read our Policies and Disclosures.
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT. About VT - Comment Policy
GREAT INFO on Ammonium Nitrate in particular, and nuclear bombs (mico-mini-full fledged) in general !
All that we have to hope is that the *mad* 1% probability threat/100% preventive strike doctrine of “big Dick” Cheney don’t have traction in the US politician minds…
Mediterranean climate. “The climate of Lebanon is generally subtropical and is characterized by hot, dry summers and mild, humid winters. “
It appears that Lebanese themselves are more concerned with the current Covid lockdown than the actual nuclear explosion and aftermath. Should this nuclear event go under the rug as it seems so, we are in for another 20-year treat by the haunty wanton wartorn Pentagon whores and snitches. Thank you Aoun, with other global media help as well. Another lithmus test for humanity, much like 9/11.
There are many published peer reviewed papers showing that high explosives can detonate pure ammonium nitrate; as an example look at page A321 of the “ENCYCLOPEDIA OF EXPLOSIVES AND RELATED ITEMS PATR 2700 VOLUME 1.”
For a real world example of dynamite detonating 500 tons of ammonium nitrate (with no fuel), look up the “Oppau Explosion.” The French Miistry of Environment describes it in a publication that you can find if you google: “FD_14373_oppau_1921_ang.pdf”
Also, ammonium nitrate that is stored in an uncontrolled environment (that is, exposed to humidity and varying temperature), as was apparently the case in Beirut, can become more sensitive to detonation. For a real world example of this phenomenon google: Takata air bags ammonium nitrate.
I think Israel did this, not with any kind of nuke, but with a high explosive munition.
We went to two real explosives experts. Remember, no moisture here, this is Lebanon in summer, hottest place on earth with NO electricity. My own belief, if there was one bag on this crap, someone would have stolen it years ago for farming. Lebanon already has explosives, they arrive by the shipload, the good stuff. The idea that Hez wanted “it” for something, trucking it around, ok, many many trucks for some secret truck convoy attack. The AN explosion, a fantasy along with everything else reported. Believe NONE Of it.
According to weather-atlas(dot)com, Beirut Lebanon has significant humidity, with July and August being two months out of the year with the highest average humidity at 73%. What happens is that the NH4NO3 cycles between two different crystalline phases (which occupy a different volume) as the ambient temperature goes above and below 90 degrees Fahrenheit in the presence of some humidity (you don’t need much because the stuff is hygroscopic). This causes an increase in the porosity of the prills and some cracking and some breaking up into smaller pieces, all of which increase susceptibility to detonation.
But this is just an aside. The abundant literature on the subject shows that pure ammonium nitrate prills can be detonated as manufactured by high explosives without any fuel. It just generally needs more confinement and a more powerful shock, i.e. a bigger detonator/booster, than you would typically need for ANFO or ammonal.
The “Oppau Explosion” proves by dramatic real world example that ammonium nitrate (without any fuel) can be detonated with dynamite – and the ammonium nitrate in that case was even mixed with ammonium sulfate which was acting like an inert desensitizer.
not claiming any traveler experience, but how long would a ton of ammonium nitrate last in an unprotected warehouse in Beirut ? Bout the same as one in NYC ?
There is a comfortable position for patience on this one.
Harold, the very first sentence in the Oppau report says a mixture of ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate, so that seems a bit difficult to use as an example of dry AN prill, detonating . “Compared to ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate is strongly hygroscopic, so the mixture of ammonium sulfate and nitrate compacted under its own weight, turning it into a plaster-like substance in the 20-metre-high (66 ft) silo. The workers needed to use pickaxes to get it out, a problematic situation because they could not enter the silo and risk being buried in collapsing fertilizer. To ease their work, small charges of dynamite were used to loosen the mixture.”
Not the same as dry prill in bags.
That’s a good text but then what good are these teachings that everybody reads and nobody follows .
its hard to believe a major city filled with civilians was attacked with a nuclear missile…and days later there is nothing on the MSM news.
Jews control the media, and love nothing more than a holocaust, especially of women and children and especially on their jewish holy days, so of course they go along with it. even presstv and rt haven’t mentioned the nukes; only trunews and vt. EDTA removes depleted uranium, cesium 137, and other highly radioactive nuclear isotopes from the body; www bitchute com /video/R0zmUV8aBON5/
There has been total denial in the media about mini-nukes being use. We published a huge amount of material on 9-11, including the Sandia Labs report that mini-nuke mines under the WTC buildings brought the down. No one ever challenged us, nor wanted to know any about it. Here is one: https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2014/06/02/vt-nuclear-education-undeniable-proof-of-911-as-a-nuclear-event/
There are photos of bags with labels which say “NITROPRILL HD” in what looks like a storage facility. When I googled NITROPRILL HD the search results led to a company which appears to mine AN and add the other necessary ingredient(s) to make their explosive product with the name Nitroprill. First, this info if true does NOT preclude the blast from being nuclear The explosive makes a better cover for a non conventional than dirt and rocks labeled amonium nitrate. It could explain the two distinctive explosions, first one by very degraded Nitroprill HD. from years of storage, second one from something else, very powerful and not degraded.
Nowdays RT resembles a polished version of Fox News. I stopped watching RT since many months.
their comment section is owned by israeli military intelligence, search for tel aviv in the terms and conditions of the comment platform; they constantly roast big tech censorship but they themselves are worse than facebook
And Furry potato is a veteran. As are many others doing the same. Protecting the first.
Elvin, Anyone who studies the human condition knows, anger comes from fear, so this is why, this crap , the violence is in the wake of every path this crap is pedaled.
Just so you know.
This writing is not terrifying when examined closely, it is actually repugnant and immature.
And the people who pedal it, are not your friend.
And it has nothing to do with the topic. Just your emotions and hang ups.
A proper sample of what this churns out, can be seen in all it’s deranged glory by following Furry Potato on YT, one video is I Am Legion. Learn the law and learn discernment.
Oh for cryin out loud. …spooky language….
As this EXCELLENT research continues, with these articles, may I PLEASE suggest that VT do so, with a target in mind, to produce a book/compilation, similar to Christopher Bollyns research into the involvement of the Israeli Military Intelligence during 911.
ALSO, PLEASE, Dave Von Kleist was able to produce two DVDs, 911 In Plane Site and 911 Ripple Effect, using video tapes of the live feeds, sent into him when he was a presenter on the Power Hour on the radio. It was the latter of these two films, that I saw one day, which made me realise world events were not truthfully presented on main stream television or media.
VT are to be commended for the articles that they have already BRAVELY published.
To those in Beirut and Lebanon, you have my sympathies for this truly horrific situation that has been pre-planned. The world NEEDS to know what has gone on here.
WHO in their right minds in Israel, thought this to be a good idea?
This EVIL act, is an act of desperation, by Israel. It shows how weak Israel really is…
Condolences to ALL those who have suffered in Lebanon.
Back on August 9th a Canadian new outlet stated the following, “The huge chemical explosion that hit Beirut’s port, devastating large parts of the Lebanese capital and claiming over 150 lives, left a 43-metre (141 foot) deep crater, a security official said Sunday.”
Gordon, do you have an update as to the actual depth of the Beirut bomb crater? If indeed it’s true that the crater is 43 meters deep, that would be the equivalent of a 12-story building, which would require much more than a warehouse filled with fertilizer. According to the Union of Concerned Scientists, a hole that deep would require a nuclear bunker-buster bomb like the US B61-11 dialed up to around 200 kilotons. If the MSM is going to tell us a bunch of lies you would think that at least they could keep their bullshit story straight. But, this happened on 9/11 as well so I’m not surprised.
We are suspicious that this should have been 43 feet and not 43 meters. With the government of Lebanon semi -function and everyone desperate to keep their jobs, no one there is going to rattle the cage on anything. The other side of this is that the 43 meter figure is so huge, the even the world media does not seem to care, despite how glaring a claim that none weaponized fertilizer could have done it. I am beginning to suspect that the word went out that an act of war event would cancel out getting any insurance claims paid, and they are desperate to get that money, so they are sucking up the attack.
Jim, it’s hilarious that even the Times of Israel is still pushing this absurdity, “The huge chemical explosion that hit Beirut’s port, devastating large parts of the Lebanese capital and claiming over 150 lives, left a 43-meter (141 foot) deep crater, a security official said Sunday.” Again, does the Zionist spin machine pay any attention to how ridiculous their claims actually are? I’m sure all the major players in the region know the truth, though. Israel has declared war on Lebanon, pure and simple. Iran, Russia, and China know it, and I’m sure the USA does, too.
Interesting to see after posters pointed out that amonium nitrate would not create any kind of powerful explosion if not mixed with “fuel” . Now we see “news” that the amonium nitrate shipper to Beirut mixed with some hydrocarbon. Not a peep about any premix till I and others pointed out AN by itself is not apt or will not even explode. Just as potassium
nitrate wilnot explode without some fuel, in gunpowder it’s15% charcoal & 10% sulphur.
Once it had been mixed with hydrocarbons that means in could not have been used for fertilizer, which we were told was in the shipping paper work which they will never produce, claiming it went up in the fire, like archive documents are ever kept in such a facility.
Yea, a crazy reach to think a ships captain would allow tons of material in breathable bags stinking like kerosene onto any ship, and that warehouse would have smelled like a fuel bomb for about 4 years. That the material was premixed seems near impossible, that was the point of the mining expert. Who was dousing that material with thousands of gallons of fuel in the warehouse for hours and hours before it blew ?
I did peruse Mr Basulto’s (the so called expert in the video) resume and list of qualifications. He is listed in the company directory as many things,(perhaps a few too many) among them an investigator of fire or explosions.
But, his primary function is mechanical engineering and building systems. No where is he listed as explosive expert or ordinance expert. Clearly, he did not know the properties of AN. So, the commentor who disagreed with him was correct. AN needs FO to become ANFO. Pretty simple.
Also, there was a chemist who explained the red “smoke” was dust and material, the material that had to leave to form that crater, not smoke as a bi-product of burning AN, but the AN itself or other ferrous material below it.
If nuke blast it would seem the crater “vaporized” at super high temp into its shape. Nothing “burning up” to make red smoke.but for the grain in the grain elevators!
Just what I think I don’t know.
Comments are closed.