The Los Angeles police shootings: Too likely a political false flag

Whenever we see a video in resolution that a 20 year old flip phone could beat, we know something is wrong. 

7
2256

…by the Senior Editor

The first take on this is that the shooter is theatrically dressed in a ball cap and hip hop trousers to resemble a gang member in an initiation ceremony like is shown on television.

We ask questions such as:

  • Why were the officers there?  Was this predictable and who knew they were there?  The easy answer, the police knew they were there, and we are learning what that means.
  • These are very junior personnel, what does this tell us, with no strong connections to the “blue underworld” that runs Los Angeles.
  • Why now?  Is there an incident tied to this? (no)
  • Who benefits? (Trump/Kosher Nostra/police/militias/military contracts/certain Israeli groups as in the killing of Michael Hastings)
  • What has been the response?

Whenever we see a video in resolution that a 20 year old flip phone could beat, we know something is wrong.  Nothing below 1080P exists.  Los Angeles set up its first system between 2011 and 2013 which has been updated twice and is the most extensive in the US.

The ACLU has been at war with LA over the system which has facial recognition, low light capability and is joy stick controllable.

Now we learn that with the massive price tag, the camera’s cost 80 cents each, or so we are being asked to believe.

If this is as we suspect, the police sacrificing two junior transportation officers in order to interfere in an election and boost their own funding, then this will play out with a patsy and, of course, lots of rhetoric.

We will also have a Qanon statement about it.  That will seal the deal.

About VT Editors
VT Editors is a General Posting account managed by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff. All content herein is owned and copyrighted by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

7 COMMENTS

  1. I mean, that midget aint exactly going anywhere fast on those lil legs, but…

    Why did the midget even run?

    Doesn’t he know you can shoot people and WALK down the middle of the street by police as everyone shouts “HE’S THE SHOOTER”.

  2. The QAnon Alex Jones Trumptards* who think everything is staged probably think THIS one is real.

    The purported laughing bystanders totally NOT crisis actors.

    Let’s say it IS totally legit and not… trumped up.

    How would antiBLM / Trumpers react if the shooter was known, caught and NOT EVEN ARRESTED?

    Like officer Pantaleo, who laughed into the camera right after choking Eric Garner to death on video. And…

    • Insecure AltRight / Trumpers see BLM as

      “Black Lives Matter More”.
      “ONLY Black Lives Matter”…

      But for proof that the reality is Blue Lives Matter More, consider the reaction if a Steven Paddock shot up a police convention instead of a concert.

      500 wounded officers, 58 dead.

      Especially in a nation where people don’t know, and can’t handle the truth that police officer isn’t a dangerous job; never makes Top 10 Dangerous Jobs and the homicide rate vs police is about same as the general public.

  3. This conjures up the raw black & white images of the U.S. Navy released video purportedly showing an Iranian vessel removing an unexploded mine that had been attached to one of the tankers in the Persian Golf. Trump blamed Iran for attaching the explosives almost immediately. The other odd thing is the timing of the recording as if the cameraman had a prior knowledge of the shooting as he zooms in when the fires are shot.