COVID – Press TV with Carol Duff


Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. “The epidemiological hallmark of a new transmissible disease is that it spreads exponentially until it has saturated a susceptible pool of the population, a process described by Farr’s law.” -Peter H. Duesberg in “AIDS Epidemiology: Inconsistencies with Human Immunodeficiency Virus and with Infectious Disease:” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 88, pp. 1575-1579, February 1991.
    The attempt to “flatten the curve” was not an attempt to reduce the number of infections but rather an attempt to delay some of the infections so that hospitals would not be overrun with patients in the short run. If some of the people in the susceptible pool of the population have managed, so far, to avoid becoming infected with the virus, when the masks, self isolation and social distancing restrictions are removed, they are at a greater rick of being exposed to the virus and thus to become infected. This is not a “second wave”, it’s simply a continuation of the process of the original spread of the virus.
    A scientific question that might be asked under the circumstances would be what is it that makes the difference between those who are in the susceptible pool of the population and those who are not? That is, of course, if an ounce of prevention is still worth a pound of cure.

Comments are closed.