Big Conspiracy Donor Wants His Money Back in Trump Vote Fraud Scam

5
2744

A venture capitalist sued for the return of his $2.5 million investment in the non-profit True the Vote’s efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election through lawsuits that they filed—and precipitously withdrew—in courts around the country.

After a conversation with True the Vote’s president Catherine Engelbrecht, Eshelman says he wired his initial $2 million contribution on Nov. 5, as the tide was turning against the incumbent but before President-elect Joe Biden was declared the winner.

“Based upon Ms. Engelbrecht’s representations regarding defendant’s comprehensive plans to investigate, litigate, and publicize illegal balloting and other election fraud as part of its Validate the Vote 2020 efforts, plaintiff agreed to give an initial gift of $2 million to defendant on the condition that the funds would be used to fund the initial stages of the Validate the Vote project,” the 12-page complaint states, emphasizing the caveat in original. “Specifically, $1 million of that initial pledge was intended to fund efforts to communicate defendant’s findings via the contemplated litigation. Plaintiff advised he would contribute more as the project progressed.”



Eshelman’s contribution was many times larger than the charity typically rakes in annually. True the Vote reported less than $500,000 in total contributions in 2016 and 2017, the last two years for which their tax returns are publicly available.

But Eshelman’s lawsuit says their budget was also relatively modest—”approximately $750,000″—in 2019.

Then, President-elect Joe Biden decisively won the election by commanding margins in several battleground states. True the Vote hawked an ambitious project giving investors hope in altering those results…read more…

Investor Sues to Get His $2.5 Million Back After Supporting True the Vote’s Flailing Pro-Trump Election Suits

 

 

ATTENTION READERS

We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.

5 COMMENTS

  1. Eshelman trusts Engelbrecht over a con. Why does Bernard Madoff’s style “or your money back” con comes to mind ?!

  2. If I have the percentages right 1 million went to Trumps campaign debt and 1.5 to the legal fund,.. just for that one donor.
    Being rich don’t make you smart. Just one of many lessons professor donald teaches.

Comments are closed.