How Darwin’s ‘Descent of Man’ Holds Up 150 Years After Publication
by Dan Folk/Smithsonianmag.com
Charles Darwin’s On the Origin of Species rattled Victorian readers in 1859, even though it said almost nothing about how the idea of evolution applied to human beings. A dozen years later, in 1871, he tackled that subject head-on. In The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex, published 150 years ago this month, Darwin argued forcefully that all creatures were subject to the same natural laws, and that humans had evolved over countless eons, just as other animals had. “Man,” he wrote, “still bears in his bodily frame the indelible stamp of his lowly origin.”
In Descent, Darwin details a theory that he calls “sexual selection”—the idea that, in many species, males battle other males for access to females, while in other species females choose the biggest or most attractive males to bond with. The male-combat theory would explain, for example, the development of a bull’s horns, or a moose’s antlers, while the quintessential example of “female choice” is seen in peahens, which, Darwin argued, prefer to mate with peacocks having the biggest, most colorful tails. For Darwin, sexual selection was just as important as natural selection, which he had outlined in Origin—the idea that organisms with favorable traits are ….read more:
Carol graduated from Riverside White Cross School of Nursing in Columbus, Ohio and received her diploma as a registered nurse. She attended Bowling Green State University where she received a Bachelor of Arts Degree in History and Literature. She attended the University of Toledo, College of Nursing, and received a Master’s of Nursing Science Degree as an Educator.
She has traveled extensively, is a photographer, and writes on medical issues. Carol has three children RJ, Katherine, and Stephen – one daughter-in-law; Katie – two granddaughters; Isabella Marianna and Zoe Olivia – and one grandson, Alexander Paul. She also shares her life with her husband Gordon Duff, many cats, and two rescues.
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming educated opinion. In addition, to get a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media, please read our Policies and Disclosures.
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT. About VT - Comment Policy
The problem is not with Darwinism, but neo Darwinism, which hijacked the discussion in favour of Atheism/Emanation (the Unfolding/Enfolding Principle). Evolution is not a Problem (God’s Hand moves in Mysterious Ways) and the Basic Dichotomy is Creation (First Cause Extant) versus Emanation (Pantheism, Gnosis et al., Good Spark trapped in Evil matter, to be eliminated, The Death Cult).
So is it to be a “Dog Eat Dog World” as promoted by the President of Business International, Obama’s First Employer out of Uni. (“there is no basis for morality in ‘rational’ thought”), to Fortune 100 Corporations a la the Sabbatian Frankists “no Chris, not love your neighbour, love your friend” (Social Contract, British Empirical Philosophy and Talmudic Thought) , or alternatively a Natural Law System of Universal (Catholic by Definition) Love and Respect for All, Family and not just “Competition” and “Free Enterprise”, concepts promoted by the Lies from The Marked Deck Fed, owned by YOU KNOW WHO? Symbiosis versus Parasitism.
Free Enterprise (Money Printed for Free out of thin air) for The Fed/Aristos (if One can call THEM that) and Competition for The Plebs.
Comments are closed.