By Ian Greenhalgh and Don Fox for VT
Originally published July 18, 2014
It was Dr. James Fetzer that introduced me to Veterans Today. We had worked together on 9/11 where my expertise in photographic and image analysis helped his research.
Several teams at Veterans Today had been working on 9/11 and, by the time I met them, all had come to the conclusion that 9/11 was a nuclear event. They had also come to the conclusion that other researchers, the total amateurs and those with some expertise but “axes to grind,” pet conspiracy theories or books to peddle, had crippled any effort to move forward.
Others, far too many others, many “activists” were something else, something unwholesome, clearly working for those responsible for 9/11. As many if not most of these folks aren’t very bright, they had become rather obvious.
The real breakthrough came when Veterans Today was given access to documents “borrowed” from the Department of Energy and given to Russian intelligence. The Russians, in turn, angry at the US over the Ukraine coup, looked for an American source to publish this material. Only “VT” would touch it.
This material was the product of a broad investigation into where nuclear weapons were acquired, who had stolen them, how they were reconfigured, where they were placed, and more. However, not all information we wanted was there.
Don Fox and I went to Gordon Duff who introduced us to a senior US Army/NATO officer who had commanded nuclear forces in Europe. He concurred that 9/11 was nuclear, answered what he could, and helped direct us onward.
Although we had made a lot of progress, there were still many gaps in our knowledge so when we learned that Gordon Duff had sources within the US nuclear weapons labs and that material was coming out that had never been seen before, we were eager to see if we could use it to fill in the gaps.
We were given direct access to documents, not only tied to the suppressed nuclear weapons investigation of 9/11 but private notes by investigators as well. Duff then told us that we could submit questions. A day later, we received answers you will see below.
This material is astounding, it comes from the highest levels of America’s weapon design community and is highly classified. After reading this, you will never be able to think about 9/11 and the threat of nuclear weapons in the same way ever again.
Where, for years, would-be investigators, bloggers, phonies, malignant narcissists have peddled pet theories like carnival barkers, real nuclear weapons designers, many from the same team that wrote the DOE 9/11 Report (2003), had no need to fabricate and dissemble.
Q: How many types of devices were used in New York on 9/11? I see where a case can be made for 2 or 3 different types of devices.
A: At least two different types of nuclear weapons were used. One is a standard micro nuke with a (W-54 Pit design) of less than 3 kilotons in size and greater than 500 ton minimum in blast size.
The bigger enhanced weapons use to bring down towers 1 and 2 were at least 1 to 3 kiloton in size. The fireball size limits the kiloton size of the weapon to less than 200 feet in diameter due to the size of the buildings. For every 1 kiloton of blast effect, you get approximately a 50-foot radius sized fireball. The size of the fireball can be much less when contained inside a steel structure. So a 3 kiloton weapon will produce a 150-foot fireball.
In a thermobaric design, the plasma fireball will remain the same size but it will be under much greater pressure and have more density due to the added iron oxide material in the fireball. When the fireball expands to its maximum size of 150 feet and just after it consumes all of the building materials in this area; (up to 150 tons for a 3 kiloton weapon) it begins to cool very rapidly.
As it cools it will expel the molten hot iron plasma under great pressure just like in a volcano. Shooting the “Lava” or plasma straight up the central core of the building. This volcanic burst of hot iron plasma will literally gut the inside of the building of anything that it comes in contact with. The follow on EMP pulse will add even more thermal heat to the structural components of the building. The EMP pulse will also destroy or erase any surviving computer hard drives in the area.
Q: The above-ground nukes appear to be much smaller than the below-ground nukes. And the nukes below the Towers appear to be different than the nukes below Building 7.
A: Yes each building needs a different amount of explosive charge to bring it down. This depends on the size, shape, and mass of the building. It is basic demolition physics. Buildings 4-6 were smaller requiring lesser charges to bring them down. Building 7 was bigger needing more than one charge. Towers one and two required much more charge and they needed a bigger hole to drop them into. These were the specially designed thermobaric weapons, used just for this purpose.
Q: We see evidence for neutron bombs in the USGS dust samples and the DOE water samples. The primary stage appears to be uranium as we see uranium in the dust samples and not plutonium. The secondary appears to be lithium deuteride as we see tritium in the DOE water samples. Could a thermobaric nuke use uranium for the primary?
A: Yes. A Uranium or Plutonium weapon can be used as the primary. The primary only needs to be a fission weapon design. Uranium is also used in a Plutonium weapon as a neutron reflector and energy booster. It reduces the amount of PU needed by 25 to 50%. The Uranium will not completely burn because it is a neutron reflector so it shows up in the fallout. 1 pound of Pu or Uranium will produce up to 3 ounces of fallout per pound of fuel consumed by the primary.
So if the weapon used 15 lbs of fuel it will produce 45 ounces of fallout. Most of this will be absorbed by secondary burning the remaining nuclear fuel in the thermobaric reaction. Adding Iron oxide to the secondary will reduce heavy radioactive fallout to acceptable levels after several days. It is a clean burn weapon. This is why it was used; fewer fallout problems to deal with.
For every 1 kiloton of energy produced in a nuclear explosion, it will consume up to 50 tons of iron or steel when it is sucked into the plasma fireball turning it into vaporized gas. When it cools and it is exposed to air or water vapor, it forms micro granules of iron oxide spheres in the 7 to 10-nanometer range.
All metal spheres formed by the plasma ball when cooled will vary in size, based on their atomic weight and wavelength of light that they absorb. The size is determined by the wavelength of the light radiated by the plasma fireball ranging from 30 nanometers (infrared light) down to less than 1 nanometers for (x-rays and Gamma rays). Iron only absorbs light in the 7 to 10-micron range, this is why they are that size. Gold Silver and Aluminum all adsorb shorter wavelengths so they are much smaller in size.
If the fallout sample is not taken directly from the very center of ground zero it will show less and less PU or Uranium in the samples the farther you get from the zero points of detonation. This is because most of the unburnt radioactive material does not travel very far from the plasma ball.
The secondary purpose of the iron oxide is to convert excess Gamma, X-ray, and Neutron radiation into thermal energy. Its third function is to convert Alpha and Beta radiation into heat. Its fourth function is to convert the excess free electrons produced by the blast into a bigger EMP pulse. Its fifth function is to contain or absorb the radioactive fallout and reduces its levels, helping in the cleanup.
If a very thick solid iron casing is used it will fragment just like in a grenade or in an artillery shell so softer iron powder is used. It also needs a lot of surface area in order to produce a thermobaric effect. When this hot plasma that is over 1 million degrees centigrade in temperature and over 5,000 degrees C. at its edges comes in contact with any other material it will either immediately vaporize it or melt it. Even if it does not melt it if the structural steel elements of the building rise in temperature above their Curie point then they will lose all structural strength and bend like pretzels.
This is basically a first-generation plasma weapon when used in a closed steel construction building. The closed steel construction also further helps contain the fallout, when used in a very tall steel structure such as on 911. The 1,000 foot long or tall steel central core of the building acts as a thermal waveguide for the hot plasma converting the central steel core into a Directed Energy Weapon. It also acts as an electromagnetic waveguide for the EMP pulse and directs the energy produced by the weapon straight up the central core. It basically forms a very crude Directed Energy Weapon.
The EMP pulse is vertically polarized and it is primarily absorbed by the building’s steel structure. The reaming EMP field effects do not radiate any farther than the magnetic near field produced by the original blast. The steel building acts as a Faraday cage absorbing and re-radiating the EMP energy as thermal heat, adding to the thermobaric effect. X-rays, Gamma rays, and neutrons are rapidly absorbed by most of the heavy materials in the building so very little of this radiation will travel more than a few blocks from the outside of the building structure.
In order to prevent a counter EMP from knocking out electrical power in lower Manhattan, the building had to be power downed just before the blast. This would require someone switching off the power in the transformer substation that was used by the WTC complex and the power company.
So there you have it – the nuclear secrets of 9/11 laid bare for all to see. No longer can there be any denial that NYC was nuked. The nanothermite theory was a psyop from the beginning to hide the nuclear event at the towers.
We must salute those who chose to release this highly classified information, they have done a great service by finally answering the ‘how’ of the destruction of the WTC.
It did occur to us to ask why is this information coming out now, the answer gave us further insight into the people behind the terrible crime of 9/11. The following short remark was at the end of the text.
“Bush, Cheney and Rahm Emmanuel are gone. So are most of the original co-conspirators. They are or have been removed from power. This makes it safer for the whistleblowers.”
Note the names they use and the order they are in. This opens up so many more questions, this time questions that may actually have answers of consequence.
Dick Cheney recently warned, or perhaps threatened would be more accurate, that a ‘far deadlier nuclear 9/11” may happen; now we know that 9/11 was a nuclear event and that Cheney was at the heart of the conspiracy; therefore his prediction is truly frightening.
The information above is far from all that has been published, supplied as part of the DOE documents, or brought forward by loyal Americans working in our nuclear weapons programs. These are only the unanswered questions, the details we felt would give us the answers we needed.
Veterans Today had already published papers on the bomb designs, where the 9/11 weapons had been placed and extensively on those who had accessed the weapons. All of the articles I reviewed were, as with this one, detailed, lots of hard science. What is of particular note is the fact that never have so many previously unpublished details on specialized weapons programs ever been released in the same decade, much less in a few short days.
What I also learned working with VT is that, though the mainstream media is boycotting this information, the military and intelligence community is not. Some very dangerous people are now both angry and motivated.
That I have seen. It took this kind of openness and detail after over a decade of childish deceit.