‘Troubling new gap’ based on gender, race and politics growing among military officers, study warns

…from Stars and Stripes

[ Editor’s Note: This popped up out of the blue this morning, an interesting peek inside the military officer ranks on the often sensitive topic of feelings of superiority inside the military over civilian society. I have never seen the topic dealt with so openly before.

But I salute those who initiated the study, as one must always have a good handle on what an organization feels about itself internally, and in comparison with the rest of society.

It came as no surprise that white conservatives felt themselves superior to their civilian compatriots. But I would ask them, what is the point in that when you are going to end up back in civilian society eventually and be among the lesser beings?

Maybe they feel that as veterans they are still in military, which is partially true, as all able vets can be called back up in a declared emergency if Uncle Sam determines that their skills are needed. Technically they can not say no without triggering a military judicial incident.

Support for the military has always been a delicate topic, particularly when it comes to criticism. Inside the ranks, especially during war gaming with red and blue teams, criticism is the whole point, to uncover weaknesses that need to be fixed.

To allow no criticism is to allow rot to set in, and historically there has been a lot of examples where denial, or covering up a problem, led to disaster. The Challenger shuttle tragedy was one such example.

Reagan wanted his big historical event, to talk to the female astronaut during his State of the Union address, so the launch people were leaned on to not miss the deadline. The crew died, but Reagan survived. You can judge which would have been better for the country.

All organizations have to take a realistic look at themselves to spot and fix negative emerging trends before they can do major damage. That is a more delicate problem for the military, because when something is done wrong, for the sake of military command structure integrity, someone must be punished as an example.

Ask any enlisted man who has misplaced a piece of equipment within his command, or god forbid, a weapon. Gordon can tell you stories about thisJim W. Dean ]

Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>

West Point cadets enjoy their big day

First published … March 10, 2021

The military needs to act to stop a divide from growing in the officer ranks, where white conservative men are more likely than others to feel pride in service and that the military culture is superior to civil society, a study has found.

…“Military elites’ feelings of superiority over the rest of society are more prevalent among conservatives, Republicans, whites, and men … than among liberals, Democrats, women, and African Americans,” said the study published in the spring issue of the Texas National Security Review.

…“These findings should give senior military leaders and their civilian superiors pause,” she and co-authors Heidi Urben — also a retired Army colonel — and National Defense University research fellow Brett Swaney, wrote in the study.

…In the past, service used to “trump politics” and people from diverse backgrounds found “common ground through shared sacrifice,” the study said. “Today, however, both uniformed and non-uniformed leaders should come to terms with a worrisome side effect in the professionalized fighting force — that servicemembers’ ideology and politics may shape their conception of service.”

You can read the full article here.

Biography
Managing Editor
Jim W. Dean is Managing Editor of Veterans Today involved in operations, development, and writing, plus an active schedule of TV and radio interviews. Read Full Complete Bio >>>

Jim W. Dean Archives 2009-2014
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

4 COMMENTS

  1. Way too cozy for officers. Wives and kids , nice base housing, lots of medals and awards, and always a republican politician to overly aggrandize the entire thing.
    If anyone cared about vets, they would stop starting wars.
    Cut the budget by 80% and let the generals prioritize. I can pretty much tell you the first thing gone is plush base housing and cushy salaries.
    The military serves at the pleasure of the people, we can decide we don’t need them completely if that is our wish. I’m thinking the 6 best subs, 4 air force bases for fighters, a couple more for transports, and healthy cyber unit ought to do it. We have a heavily armed civilian populace, and an easily defended land mass with friendly neighbors. You get 100 billion total.

  2. Jim Dean wrote:

    “To allow no criticism is to allow rot to set in, and historically there has been a lot of examples where denial of, or covering up a problem, lead to a disaster. The Challenger tragedy was a perfect example.

    “Reagan wanted his big historical event, to talk to the female astronaut during his State of the Union address, so the launch people were leaned on not to miss the deadline. They died, but Reagan survived. You all can judge which would have been better for the country.”

    Very glad to see Jim citing the Challenger disaster as an example of a cover-up. This is the main topic of the book I published in 2007: “Challenger Revealed: An Insider’s Account of How the Reagan Administration Caused the Greatest Tragedy of the Space Age.” I recently talked about my role in exposing the cover-up in the Netflix production, “Challenger: The Final Flight.”

    Thanks Jim.

    Richard Cook

    • You’re going to use the Challenger to take potshots at Reagan and try to incite hostility between the two controlled parties and their naive supporters??? Do you ever get tired of using the same old trick to cause division amongst the population? But, using the Challenger takes some real hutzpa! I take it you just deny the fact that a few random internet sleuths found 6 of 7 crewmembers ALIVE a couple of years ago working cush jobs while using unimaginative aliases and some even pretending they were the “twin sibling” of the crewmembers who supposedly died back in 1986 on the Challenger! What? Do you claim it’s a ridiculous “conspiracy theory”? Funny, because your book is actually the ridiculous conspiracy theory. You’re a court historian for the international banksters. Have you no shame?

  3. The principal of “power” and the principle of “seniority” combined with the principles of “allegiance” and “pride” can combine in some really ugly outcomes.

Comments are closed.