Muslim Advocates Condemns FBI Director Wray’s Premature Dismissal of Hate Crime in Atlanta Shootings

3
780

Group Urges Law Enforcement to Not Repeat Mistakes of Chapel Hill Murder Investigation in Atlanta Investigation

Washington, DC — On Tuesday, a gunman killed eight people at three Atlanta-area massage parlors, six of whom were women of Asian descent. On Wednesday, Cherokee County Sheriff’s Office spokesperson Capt. Jay Baker downplayed race as a motivating factor, saying that the suspect blamed his actions on the suspect having a “really bad day.” On Thursday FBI Director Christopher Wray told NPR that “it does not appear that the motive was racially motivated.” Muslim Advocates also just sent Wray a letter for the second time asking him to meet with civil right leaders and prioritize the safety of Muslim, Asians, Jews and other vulnerable communities—a letter that Wray has again ignored.

In 2015, three American Muslims—Deah Barakat, his wife Yusor and her sister Razan Abu-Salha—were shot to death in Chapel Hill, North Carolina by a man who previously expressed anti-Muslim hate. Local police blamed the violence on “a dispute over parking” and the shooter was never charged with a hate crime. In 2019, Muslim Advocates accompanied Dr. Mohammad Abu-Salha, the father of Yusor and Razan, as he testified about his family’s tragic loss, making him the first Muslim hate crime victim to testify before Congress.

The following is a statement from Muslim Advocates Executive Director Farhana Khera:

“We are stunned and saddened by the horrific violence in Atlanta and at the ongoing hate and violence targeting the AAPI community. This mass shooting in Atlanta needs to be thoroughly investigated, including the possible motives for this heinous attack. A police officer with a record of sharing anti-Asian hate on Facebook promoted the shooter’s story that he merely had a ‘bad day.’ His shocking statement, which sounded like he was a  spokesperson for the shooter, not the police department, should not be the last word on whether this was a hate crime.

We are also simply shocked that FBI Director Wray would prematurely send a signal that the FBI has come to the conclusion that this crime was not motivated by hate when the investigation has only just begun, particularly when his own statement focuses on race and fails to recognize gender-motivated hate. Director Wray’s ignorance underscores the lack of understanding by even the highest law enforcement officials of the nature and scope of hate crimes. More must be done by federal and local officials to educate and train law enforcement officials at all levels.

In 2019, I sat directly behind Dr. Mohammad Abu-Salha as he told members of Congress about how his two daughters and son-in-law were murdered by a man motivated by hate. I saw the heartbreak and fear that he and the Muslim community experienced when police dismissed the deaths as the result of a mere parking dispute. We cannot repeat that history in Atlanta.

There are so many factors at play in Atlanta, but they all in some way revolve around the victims’ identities as Asian women. We are currently seeing a continuing, nationwide wave of anti-Asian hate—stemming, in part, from anti-Asian COVID-19 rhetoric. However, this hate has its roots in a long and troubling history of scapegoating and inciting violence against Asian Americans, including the Chinese Exclusion Act and the internment of Japanese-Americans. Further, we must acknowledge the victims and consider why Asian women doing these jobs were targeted and why Asian women in general have been targeted by hate. According to Stop AAPI Hate, nearly two-thirds of anti-Asian hate incidents in the last year involved women. It is simply reckless to ignore these facts and chalk these murders up to one man having a ‘really bad day.’ We call on federal, state and local law enforcement to fully investigate this attack, including all the factors that led to this tragedy. We also call on the media to not accept the Cherokee County Sheriff’s Office’s story at face value and instead speak with Atlanta’s Asian American community and specifically the women who are a part of it.”

###

Muslim Advocates is a national civil rights organization working in the courts, in the halls of power and in communities to halt bigotry in its tracks. We ensure that American Muslims have a seat at the table with expert representation so that all Americans may live free from hate and discrimination.

About VT Editors
VT Editors is a General Posting account managed by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff. All content herein is owned and copyrighted by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

3 COMMENTS

  1. I do like to see activists working across lines to connect with each other no matter the issue, because that is going to be the most direct path to “correction” of law enforcement. However, I also do not want to see “hate crimes” wrongfully applied. This could cause serious damage and provide ammunition to groups who zealously pursue this angle. So, the officers who have anti-asian speech online must be removed from the case, and someone unbiased take the lead.
    It is not prudent to allow, racism and “sex addiction” excuses if the motivation was religiously taught and infused as against women. On this note, it is difficult to imagine other religions that share the same dim view of women, as advocates. We have to start calling things for what they are. Even if it directly addresses the teachings and mindset of religion. This is why we have separation (supposed to anyway) of church and state.

    • This case has an Omar Mateen flavor to it, where a man struggles with his gay tendencies against the backdrop of an extremist father with religiously zealous views about it.
      This guy , in my opinion, fits the bill, of someone who went to these women for comfort and intimacy he would never find in the church, and rather than reconcile honestly within himself, is yanked back to his programming in a fit of rage. Unable to organize priorities and realty due to relentless religious programming, he saw this as his path to adulthood and resolution to his inner conflicting voices. Would this have occurred without religious programming ? I say no.

  2. Hate crimes include sex and he obviously had a problem with women. He has two hate crime counts, race and sex against him.

Comments are closed.