…by Jonas E. Alexis, VT Editor

Jonathan Pollard, the man who has been called “one of the worst traitors of the 20th century,”[1] has a message for Israeli spies like him. Pollard agrees that Israelis in the US will always have “dual loyalty.” In other words, they will always be traitors, spies, liars, deceivers, extortionists, con artists, and double agents.

Pollard said to those who have accused him and Jews of having dual royalties: “If you don’t like the accusation of double loyalty, then go the fuck home.”[2] Pollard continued to say:

“It’s as simple as that. If you live in a country where you are constantly under that charge, then you don’t belong there. You go home. You come home. If you[‘re] outside Israel, then you live in a society in which you are basically considered unreliable. The bottom line on this charge of dual loyalty is, I’m sorry, we’re Jews, and if we’re Jews, we will always have dual loyalty.”[3]

What would Pollard say to a young US Jew working in the American security?

“I’d tell him, not doing anything is unacceptable. So simply going home [to Israel] is not acceptable. Making aliyah is not acceptable,” Pollard said. “You have to make a decision whether your concern for Israel and loyalty to Israel and loyalty to your fellow Jews is more important than your life.

“If you do nothing, and you turn your back, or simply make aliyah, and go on with your life, you’ll be no better than those Jews who before and after the destruction of the Temple said, ‘It’s not my responsibility.”[4]

Why would he even bring the destruction of the Temple to this question? Doesn’t that imply that people like Pollard are aware of the two-thousand-year struggle between Logos and anti-Logos?

One should also be asked: where is the Zionist media, the very powerful superstructure that seeks to literally demonize and de-platform anyone who would even dare to repeat what Pollard said? Is Pollard an anti-Semite? If not, then why wouldn’t the media apply the same rule everywhere? Isn’t that bias in itself?

[1] Fred Kaplan, “Just Punishment,” Slate, July 29, 2015; see also the article we have written on Pollard: https://www.veteranstoday.com/2021/01/05/lets-remove-israel-from-american-politics/.

[2] “Pollard claims Jews ‘will always have dual loyalty,’ whether they know it or not,” Times of Israel, March 21, 2021.

[3] Ibid.

[4] Ibid.

Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. Dual loyalty? If it were a matter merely of dual-loyalty, it wouldn’t be the serious problem that it is. Dual Loyalty implies one is loyal to two states that are allies, which is not too difficult in most cases, think Sir Bernard Montgomery and Gen. George Patton. But Pollard did not have dual-loyalty, he was loyal to Israel while betraying the United States. That is not dual loyalty as far as I am able to discern it. To even give in to this canard attests to the fact that man is not capable of governing himself and must have a king to oversee his society. Would any king permit any of his ministers to hold dual citizenship? Not likely.

  2. If that is so, every single person in the USA should have dual loyalty! Why do they think, they that being a Jews makes you exempt from other nations?

  3. There are several hundred Semites in this wold. The majority of the Jews are not Semites. Of those in Israel who speak a reconstructed Semitic language (Modern Hebrew), are children or grandchildren of Jews who spoke Indo-Eropean languages Mostly Germanic dialects. So they were not Semites. The term anti-Semitism was invented 2 hundred years ago at a time when they believed that Semitic was a set of Race and Nationality genetic traits and not a linguistic category. The term is thus anti-scientific and void of meaning if intended to mean “Amti-Jewish”.

Comments are closed.