…from PressTV, Tehran
[ Editor’s Note: General Austin’s speech is one to be expected from someone in his position, to justify the huge cost of the US’ forward leaning military posture. By that I mean Russian and China now have visiting fleets and missile subs lurking close to our coastline, while we respond in kind.
They also are now looking to put medium range missiles in Canada or Mexico, so they can have a quicker first strike decapitation capability. We had allies in their region who are participating in enhancing our first strike capability, which is a destabilizing strategy which some might propose makes us less secure than more.
The strategy is already a proven practical failure, in that it has forced Russia and China to invest in countermeasures that have apparently erased any advantage the US might have held.
Russia had to put domestic investment in its doomsday coastal city submarine robot nuclear weapons, plus leading the US in hypersonic weapon development and in the dead man’s nuclear missiles that can loiter for extended periods and still be able to deliver a retaliatory strike, should the Russian command structure be destroyed. And note, these are just the things that Russia has already told us it has.
And last, my dear general, if you think the US is going to maintain a technological superiority over the combined technical and volume weapon production capability of Russia and China combined, somebody is smoking something pretty exotic… Jim W. Dean ]
Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>
First published … May 01, 2021
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin says the United States should prepare for a potential future conflict starkly different from “the old wars” that have consumed the Pentagon for the past two decades.
In his first major policy speech on Friday, Austin stressed the need for the US military to move forward a faster and more innovative approach by harnessing emerging technological advancements and computing powers.
“The way we fight the next major war is going to look very different from the way we fought the last ones,” the Pentagon chief said during a trip to the US Pacific Command in Hawaii.
Austin did not mention any specific adversary by name but the impetus behind his speech was clearly a rapidly rising China, which has been increasingly intent on challenging the United States on multiple fronts including in cyberspace.
“Galloping advances in technology mean changes in the work we do to keep the United States secure across all five domains of potential conflict — not just air, land and sea, but also space and cyberspace,” Austin said.
Austin, who rose in the ranks fighting the conventional wars of the Middle East, put forward a competitive new model of deterrence consisting all domains of warfare.
“What we need is the right mix of technology, operational concepts and capabilities — all woven together in a networked way that is so credible, flexible and formidable that it will give any adversary pause,” he said. “We need to create advantages for us and dilemmas for them.”
“We can’t predict the future,” Austin said. “So what we need is the right mix of technology, operational concepts and capabilities – all woven together in a networked way that is so credible, so flexible and so formidable that it will give any adversary pause.”
The remarks come as the United States prepares to withdraw its remaining troops from Afghanistan by September 11 on orders from President Joe Biden, who seeks to score a political win by ending America’s longest war and resetting Pentagon priorities.
Austin acknowledged that he has spent “most of the past two decades executing the last of the old wars,” and said preventing a conflict in the future would mean creating “advantages for us and dilemmas” for the adversaries.
Austin’s speech underscored the fundamental shift in the Pentagon’s thinking from fighting conventional wars in the Middle East to getting ready for a more sophisticated future conflict against China or Russia.
Two weeks ago, the top US spy chief said China posed a great threat to the United States with cyber capabilities that can affect and disrupt the nation’s critical infrastructure.
In testimony before Congress, Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines said China was “an unparalleled priority for the intelligence community,” accusing Beijing of striving to change global norms through a variety of tactics.
Jim W. Dean is VT Editor Emeritus. He was an active editor on VT from 2010-2022. He was involved in operations, development, and writing, plus an active schedule of TV and radio interviews. He now writes and posts periodically for VT.
ATTENTION READERSWe See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.
About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
America’s forward posture (euphemism) creates adversaries. If the PTB opted for peace the world would follow. But to the profiteers care?
No more waivers for generals to serve cabinet positions. The measure is 7 years if I am correct. Not enough time to regain a civilian mindset, even if a very adaptable person.
After 20 years it may not even be possible in a lifetime.
When we have achieved military success their will be a second asteroid belt in our solar system where there was the third planet. Insane criminals, f’ing idiots.
It could be this time, that the USA and Friends after this WWIII are not anemore excisting, they consumed to much drugs and poison in their food, they keep speeking to their Ipads, as if they have a brain, their leaders are brain less, sorry but it is tru !
Didn’t Einstein say that the war following WWIII would be fought with sticks and stones? It’s amazing how so many Americans believe that WWIII will be a good thing. It will be that transformative apocalyptic conflict that will bring their warrior messiah back to Earth to smite the unbelievers (Democrats, mostly) while they will be raptured up to Heaven.
It’s also the basis for the Zionist Sampson Option. Israeli poet Itamar Yaoz-Kest wrote, “And yet, there is a right reserved only to us [Ashkenazim] (if indeed any human on Earth has this right): to be destroyed and to take the weary and sated world with us into non-existence, along with its wondrous libraries and heart-stirring tunes – just so, after we descend to the grave, while the ground emits radioactive rays to all four winds…”
One would think the people who run the world are smart enough, and self-interested enough not to blow the whole world up. Surely they couldn’t see that as good idea for their presumably surviving heirs. Maybe all they really want is the “what if” fear factor, and hopefully have no intention of actually blowing up the whole world.
The wealthiest 8500 families worship satan.
“….Avril Haines said…striving to change global norms….” Which global norms?? let me plunder your country and don’t resist ??
Comments are closed.