Russia says will respond firmly to any further provocative actions by UK in Black Sea


Russia has warned the UK not to make any further provocative actions off the coast of the Crimean Peninsula in the Black Sea, stressing that Moscow reserves the right to respond resolutely to such moves by the British navy.

Press TV: Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov on Thursday lambasted as a deliberate and prepared provocation a British destroyer’s breach of Russia’s territorial waters off the Crimean coast.

“We consider that the British destroyer has carried out provocation. Moreover, we regret as this was a deliberate and prepared provocation,” he said, commenting on the June 23 incident in the Black Sea, TASS news agency reported.

Peskov further said the actions of the Royal Navy destroyer Defender in the Black Sea violated international law, and were unacceptable.

“Of course, we are concerned over the actions of the British vessel. We consider such actions unacceptable, they are in violation of international law,” he noted.

“In the event of a repeat of unacceptable provocative action – if those actions go too far, no options can be ruled out in terms of legally defending Russia’s borders,” Peskov warned.

Crimea declared independence from Ukraine on March 17, 2014, and formally applied to become part of Russia following a referendum, in which 96.8 percent of participants voted in favor of the move, which plunged relations between Moscow and the West into a free fall.

The US, the European Union, and Ukraine claim that Russia has annexed the region. Moscow strongly rejects the allegation.

Elsewhere in his remarks, Peskov said Russia’s border guards and armed forces would hold a rather tough stance if anyone tried to stage similar provocations in the Black Sea.

On Wednesday, the Russian Defense Ministry said in a statement that Russia’s Black Sea Fleet, acting in cooperation with the border guard force of the Russian Federal Security Service (FSB), stopped a violation of the state border by the British destroyer HMS Defender off Crimea’s Cape Fiolent.

According to the ministry, the British military vessel ventured three kilometers into Russia’s territorial waters, prompting a Russian border guard patrol ship to fire warning shots and a Sukhoi-24M bomber to drop bombs ahead of the destroyer.

Following the warning maneuvers, the HMS Defender left the waters, but the Russian
ministry denounced the provocative action as a gross violation of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, urging London to investigate the crew’s actions.

However, the British side denied warning shots had been fired and that any bombs had been dropped in the path of the HMS Defender.

“No shots were fired at HMS Defender,” said British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab during a visit to Singapore.

This is while that Britain’s BBC released footage of the incident and said that shots were fired and that as many as 20 Russian aircraft were “buzzing” the British vessel.

Raab further claimed that the British destroyer was “conducting innocent passage through Ukrainian territorial waters.”

Russia warns Britain it will bomb ships next time

On Thursday, Russia summoned the British ambassador in Moscow, Deborah Bronnert, for a formal diplomatic scolding over the provocative move by the British vessel and to deliver a “tough demarche.”

Moscow told the UK ambassador that Britain’s action in the Black Sea was “dangerous” while Foreign Ministry spokeswoman, Maria Zakharova, accused London of “barefaced lies.”

“We can appeal to common sense, demand respect for international law, and if that doesn’t work, we can bomb,” Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told Russian news agencies.

Ryabkov, referring to Russian aircraft bombing the path of the British destroyer, said that in future bombs would be sent “not only in its path, but also on target.”

Kremlin: Putin supports increased EU-Russia dialogue 

Additionally, the Kremlin on Thursday said that Russian President Vladimir Putin supported a proposal from Germany and France for the EU to restart summits with Russia.

“We assess the initiative positively,” Peskov said at a press conference, adding, “Putin is a supporter of creating mechanisms for dialogue and contacts between Brussels and Moscow.”

Peskov was responding to a question about a proposal by Berlin and Paris for the 27-member bloc to consider a potential summit with Putin.

However, many member states of the European bloc lambasted the idea earlier in the day ahead of a debate on the issue by the EU leaders.

EU member states oppose the idea. Ukraine’s foreign minister blasted the proposal earlier Thursday ahead of a debate on the issue by the European Union leaders.

Separately, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said “a lot is unclear”, including the agenda of the proposed summit.

“It is necessary for our colleagues to explain what they mean and what they are aiming for,” he said at a press conference.

The last summit between EU chiefs in Brussels and the Russian president took place in early 2014. Since then, the European bloc has imposed waves of sanctions on Moscow in favor of Kiev.

Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. “The US, the European Union, and Ukraine claim that Russia has annexed the region. Moscow strongly rejects the allegation.”

    So, annexation is a legal problem? Really? israel has been annexing Palestinian land for decades, and yet no one says, or does, anything about the israeli annexation. Does international law have some sort of double standard?

  2. Of course, this was a provocation and an attempt to test the defenses of the Russians. I don’t think there are several press representatives on every British ship. The BBC correspondent revealed the truth and did not hide the fact that the British Navy ship deliberately entered our internal waters and received warnings from the Russians for a very long time. Later, in his interview, this was confirmed by Boris Johnson. Have you poked a Russian bear? Now go [email protected] home and scrub the shit out of the deck of the ship.
    In general, we in Russia treat the UK well. But it was not worth making a provocation. Next time we’ll feed the sharks. In Crimea, there are about 130 cemeteries of British soldiers who died there in the last 2-3 centuries. Including the Duke of Marlborough.

    • Remember Tennyson’s Charge of the Light Brigade, Andy?

      Theirs not to reason why,
      Theirs but to do and die.
      Into the valley of Death
      Rode the six hundred.

      “The Light Brigade reached the battery under withering direct fire and scattered some of the gunners, but they were forced to retreat immediately, and the assault ended with very high British casualties and no decisive gains.” (Wikipedia)

  3. Supposedly, the Russians are practicing naval exercises 35 miles off the coast of Hawaii, specifically designed with the goal of sinking an aircraft carrier in a strike group. Both sides posturing here. It seems to have ramped up since the Geneva Summit.

Comments are closed.