DC Court makes it easier to Jail Insurrectionists pending trial

With the army of attorneys on the US payroll, why was this missed during this intensely debated controversy?

0
840

Prosecutors Hint at New Conspiracy

by Glenn Kirschner, …with Justice Matters

[ Editor’s Note: The ‘Spoke and Hub’ conspiracy charge came as a wonderful surprise, making me wonder why none of the legal beagles had brought it up before. With the precedent already having been set, there are no big hurdles of having to establish case law by winning one.

With the army of attorneys on the US payroll, why was this missed during this intensely debated controversy? Color me suspicious.

This is not only bad news for Trump, but also for all of his satellite operators, militias and political grifters. He has always been “the don”, “El Trumpo” for the hillbilly rabble. Their attorneys are now faced with a steeper uphill climb to keep their clients out of jail.

This is a good sign that despite the case load numbers generated by the insurrection, someone seems to have been tasked at DoJ to review the statute book for all available prosecution tools Jim W. Dean ]

Jim's Editor’s Notes are solely crowdfunded via PayPal
Jim's work includes research, field trips, Heritage TV Legacy archiving & more. Thanks for helping. Click to donate >>

Two important developments in the insurrection cases: First, A DC appellate court issued an opinion that should make it somewhat easier to keep insurrection defendants jailed pending trial. Here is a review of that opinion.

Second, a new filing by prosecutors in one of the insurrection cases suggests that they are contemplating pursuing a “hub-and-spoke” conspiracy prosecuting that could spell real trouble for Donald Trump. Here’s why . . .

Biography
Managing Editor
Jim W. Dean is Managing Editor of Veterans Today involved in operations, development, and writing, plus an active schedule of TV and radio interviews. Read Full Complete Bio >>>

Jim W. Dean Archives 2009-2014
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy