In first public testimony, Guantanamo detainee details brutal CIA torture in ‘black sites’

Thousands missing...buried alive..

2
901

Press TV: A former Guantánamo Bay prisoner and survivor of the US government’s brutal torture program has for the first time given a detailed public account of what he endured at CIA clandestine facilities in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks.

Majid Khan, 41, a former resident of the Baltimore suburbs, told jurors in court on Thursday that he was subjected to various forms of torture, including waterboarding, forced feedings and other physical and sexual abuse during his detention in the CIA’s network of overseas “black sites” from 2003 to 2006.

The testimony, which came during a war crimes tribunal sentencing hearing at the US base in Cuba, was the first time a former CIA detainee has been able to describe what the so-called “enhanced interrogation” actually entails.

Some of what Khan went through in detention had previously been detailed in a 2014 US Senate Intelligence Committee report that accused the US spy agency of going far beyond its legal boundaries as it attempted to obtain information from inmates.

Khan recalled being suspended naked from a ceiling beam for long periods and repeatedly doused with ice water to keep him awake for days. He also spoke of interrogators forcefully holding his head under water until he nearly drowned and pouring water into his mouth and nose as soon as they let him up.

Khan also said that he was beaten, starved and sexually assaulted during his nearly three years of detention at overseas CIA black sites whose locations were not disclosed.

“I thought I was going to die,” he said.

“I would beg them to stop and swear to them that I didn’t know anything,” he said. “If I had intelligence to give, I would have given it already but I didn’t have anything to give.”

“The more I cooperated and told them, the more I was tortured,” Khan told the court.

The Senate intelligence report has also concluded that the CIA’s interrogation program was not only inhumane but often ineffective.

Khan had been captured in Pakistan in 2003 and pleaded guilty to charges of assisting al-Qaeda as a courier and planner in 2012. He was transferred to the US military detention center at Guantanamo in September 2006.

A panel of eight military officers, selected by a Pentagon legal official, sentenced Khan to 26 years in prison on Friday. He is expected to serve a much shorter sentence because of his extensive cooperation with US authorities.

After his release, Khan will be resettled in an as-yet to be determined third country. He is barred from returning to Pakistan, where he has citizenship.

Khan apologized for his actions and said he now just wanted to be reunited with his wife and daughter who was born while he was in captivity.

Human rights monitors have repeatedly urged US President Joe Biden to end the practice of indefinitely holding detainees at Guantanamo without charge, something his former boss, Barack Obama, had vowed and failed to accomplish.

The Guantanamo Bay detention center, also known as “Gitmo,” became synonymous with prisoner abuse and torture in the early years of the so-called war on terror.

The administration of former President George W. Bush had selected Guantanamo, a desolate place near the eastern tip of Cuba, because it was under full control of the US military and relatively close to the mainland, but beyond the reach of American courts.

The idea was that if the detainees were held away from US soil, they would have no legal right to seek a judge’s order of habeas corpus, which provides protection against unlawful imprisonment.

Guantanamo detainees were subjected to abuse, humiliation and torture as part of their interrogations, the accounts of which were gradually exposed to the outside world by the few inspectors who visited the prison and some of the inmates who were later released.

 

About VT Editors
VT Editors is a General Posting account managed by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff. All content herein is owned and copyrighted by Jim W. Dean and Gordon Duff
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

2 COMMENTS

  1. Khan is not allowed in Pakistan because the Pakistan military under Musharraf had handed over hundreds or as some say thousands of Pakistanis for money in the pocket of Musharraf. Pakistan military is notorious for dealing with Pakistanis. It is still trained as British Colonial military to look at their fellow countrymen as rebels to be dealt with. General Iskandar Mirza, head of state of Pakistan, once said about protesting East Pakistanis ( he no doubt had the same contempt for West Pakistanis ) ” I know how to deal with colonials ” No government in Pakistan can be above military that is why no government dares to ask for the release of Dr Aafia Siddiqui. Pakistani civilian citizen recently sent a letter to the head of the military about him being kept in the job when his period has expired. In the letter He asked him to resign For that, he was sent to prison for 5 years for treason by the military court. Yes, the military is the Colonial Power in Pakistan. It actually owns 12.5 percent of Pakistani land. Best for Mr. Khan to ask to be given residency somewhere else.

  2. I get the feeling, a lot of US people simply figure there must be some mysterious and legitimate reason why we must occupy Cuba.

    There is not.

    No legitimate force subjects people to punishments that they themselves prohibit in their own land. Again, there should be charges or the assumption is, there is no law. If there is no pathway to holding leadership accountable, we must create one.