Home World Intercept: Israeli Front Linked to War on Iran/Turkey funded by Mob Cash

Intercept: Israeli Front Linked to War on Iran/Turkey funded by Mob Cash

The Turkish Democracy Project shares leadership and personnel with the most well-funded foreign policy pressure network in Washington

2
1295

THE TURKISH DEMOCRACY PROJECT, a political advocacy group launched this summer with the stated goal of promoting democracy in Turkey, has the surprising characteristic of having no Turkish members on its leadership board. In a press release announcing its creation, the organization said that it was “committed to encouraging Turkey to adopt more democratic policies.” The two Turkish people publicly involved with the project — former Turkish politician Aykan Erdemir and academic Suleyman Ozeren — were removed from its website’s list of advisory council members not long after its launch.

The Turkish Democracy Project boasts a roster heavy with hawkish former U.S. public officials and diplomats with close ties to Israel and the Gulf Arab states.

Despite having no actual Turks publicly affiliated with the group, the Turkish Democracy Project boasts a roster heavy with hawkish former U.S. public officials and diplomats with close ties to Israel and the Gulf Arab states, including former Bush administration counterterrorism official Frances Townsend, former U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman, and former President Donald Trump’s famously aggressive national security adviser John Bolton. “It’s time to sound the alarm on Turkey,” Bolton, best known for his advocacy of U.S. confrontation with Iran, said on Twitter at the time of the Turkey Democracy Project’s launch.

Under its heavy-handed ruling AK Party, democracy in Turkey has faced serious setbacks in recent years, but what the Turkish Democracy Project specifically does to address that problem is unclear. The organization does, however, have links to a network of well-funded dark-money groups promoting U.S. foreign policy positions in the Middle East that dovetail with Saudi, Emirati, and Israeli security interests.

At the center of it all is Mark Wallace, a former George W. Bush administration ambassador to the United Nations. Wallace is presently the head not just of the Turkish Democracy Project, but also the anti-Iran organization United Against Nuclear Iran, or UANI; the counterterrorism advocacy group Counter Extremism Project, or CEP; and even an arts-based nonprofit focused on human rights in Iran called PaykanArtCar. Eight out of 11 of the Turkish Democracy Project’s senior leadership and advisory board members hold positions with UANI, CEP, or both.  Read more..

https://theintercept.com/2021/11/26/turkish-democracy-project-mark-wallace-thomas-kaplan/

 

ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

2 COMMENTS

  1. Sounds like Neocon Regime Change Part 2 Turkey and Iran Edition, Part 1 being Iraq and Afghanistan. They will not be successfull. Regardless of the harm and evil Erdogan is responsible for, without question nothing is worst than Neocon Regime Change. There is three million Iraqis dead, god knows how many Afghans and Syrians dead and unnacounted for. It is emperative these men be removed from power, otherwise the world will become one giant crater with large swaths devoid of biological life. Perhaps Iran and Turkey can put aside their differences and neutralize the neocons.

    • Looking at the big picture in that part of the world, what are the real motives behind each major player?
      I can’t say, but each political unit representing the opposing factions must have some goal in mind.
      An honest assessment and analysis of those aims could point to something.
      If all honest capabilities, objectives and “will-to-succeed” factors of all political parties involved were extrapolated or gamed out to a conclusion, maybe that situation could be brought to a close.
      But then maybe some things just have to play themselves out.
      🙄

Comments are closed.