by Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio

Versione in Italiano

When about two weeks ago in the US the Food and Drug Administration authorized the emergency use of Pfizer-Biontech’s Covid Comirnaty vaccine also for children aged 5 to 11 (previously it had already been approved for adolescents between 12 and 15) the mainstream media have clung to that 90.7% effectiveness to extol the goodness of the decision.

Those of counter-information, on the other hand, including the Italian newspaper Il Tempo, focused on the opinions of skeptical doctors of the FDA Advisory Committee but almost no one went to read the official document provided by Pfizer inc – the American multinational that produces the genic serum with the German Biontech but is also a partner of the London-based GSK, another famous Big Pharma of vaccines – in order to obtain that authorization (Emergency Use Authorization).

Taiwan suspends 2nd doses of Pfizer for Teens over Health Risk

In the 82 pages of the dossier we found there is a truly explosive statement. In fact, Pfizer itself admits that a real genic experiment will be conducted on children for 5 years since the data of two studies (one conducted in the US and the other in Israel) involved about 3 thousand children.

Actually a very small sample, not sufficient to record possible serious adverse events such as the feared inflammation of the heart (myocarditis of the internal muscle tissue or pericarditis of the external lining) so widespread among adolescents as to induce Taiwan to suspend the second dose of Pfizer for young people and some Scandinavian countries to stop the inoculation of Moderna’s messenger RNA vaccine, technically similar to that of Pfizer, for the same reason.

Page 11 of the Pfizer paper – link to whole document at bottom of the article

«The number of participants in the current clinical development program is too small to detect any potential risks of myocarditis associated with vaccination. Long-term safety of COVID-19 vaccine in participants 5 to <12 years of age will be studied in 5 post-authorization safety studies, including a 5-year follow-up study to evaluate long term sequelae of post-vaccination myocarditis/pericarditis» Pfizer writes on page 11 of its Oct. 26 report called “Briefing Document” for the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC).

The meaning may well be understood even by a 5-year-old child. FDA gives us its authorization for emergency use even if data on the most dangerous adverse reactions are missing, we will continue the studies: obviously thanks to the vaccination campaigns launched in the United States of America with the consent of the Centers of Diseases Control and Prevention, ended up in the eye of the storm over the scandalous conflict of interest between a doctor on the CDC Approval Committee and Pfizer’s Big Pharma GSK partner.

Scandal on Vaccines for Children: GSK (Pfizer Partner) Funded with $18thousand a Member of CDC who Approved the Jabs since 5yo

Inside FDA Committee the alarm about the lack of data for myocardial risks was confirmed by Leslie Ball, an FDA medical officer, who reiterated this concept, arguing that the studies were not large enough to necessarily collect an uncommon side effect such as myocarditis

Despite this, the FDA had approved the use of Comirnaty for children aged 5 and over as previously announced by the American president Joseph Biden, the great director of the mass immunization plan, in turn in macroscopic conflict of interest in relation to approximately $ 2.2 million received by Pfizer for the presidential election campaign of the Democratic Party.

British Medical Journal Contested FDA for “Political Decision” on Full Approval of Pfizer Vaccine without Public Discussion of Data

In light of what has been discovered, it is not surprising that the political and health authorities of Vienna have already started the administration of Pfizer-Biontech’s experimental genetic serum also to 5-year-old children, despite the fact that the clinical data have not yet been examined by the European Medicines Agency for the granting of emergency commercial use. Probably the Austrian data could be used by the American pharmaceutical multinational to increase the volume of statistics on the risks of adverse reactions for children.

In its “Overall risk-benefit conclusions”, again on page 11, Pfizer reiterated the reasons for the need for experimental genic sera, although – as evidenced by a geneticist from Cologne – they can also cause the modification of human DNA.

«COVID-19 continues to be a serious and potentially fatal or life-threatening infection for children and there is a significant unmet medical need in the 5 to <12 years of age population. Two primary doses of the 10 μg BNT162b2 vaccine given 3 weeks apart in 5 to <12 years of age have shown a favorable safety and tolerability profile, robust immune responses against all variants of concern and high VE against symptomatic COVID-19 in a period where the delta variant was predominant» Big Pharma doctors wrote.

“SARS-COV-2 E VACCINI MODIFICANO IL DNA UMANO. Enorme Esperimento sulla Popolazione”. Studio Incubo di Genetista Tedesco su Science Direct

«Israeli safety surveillance databases suggest that incidence rates of rare post-vaccination myocarditis peaks in individuals 16 to 19 years of age males and declines in adolescents 12 to 15 years of age. In addition, the dose for children 5 to <12 years of age is 1/3 of the dose given to older vaccinees (10 μg vs. 30 μg). Based on this information, it is reasonable to predict that post-vaccine myocarditis rates are likely to be even lower in 5 to <12 years of age than those observed in adolescents 12 to 15 years of age».

The adverb “likely” is the clearest confirmation of a genetic experiment in progress.

«Given post-authorization experience and assuming 90% efficacy as shown in the descriptive clinical study, the estimated number of COVID-19 cases and associated hospitalizations prevented over 120 days per million of fully vaccinated children 5 to <12 years of age is ~33,600 and 170, respectively. In contrast, the number of post-vaccination myocarditis cases (including myocarditis, pericarditis, and myopericarditis) expected in the same period of time per million second doses is 21 (assuming that children 5 to <12 years of age experience the same rates of post-vaccination myocarditis/pericarditis as adolescents 12 to 15 years of age in the US)» adds Pfizer by publishing in section 4 a not very reassuring graph on the incidence of heart inflammation.

Pfizer char on Ratios Comparing Rates of Myocarditis Diagnosis of Vaccine Compared with Historical Period and Unvaccinated Individuals

«We therefore may expect substantially fewer post-vaccination myocarditis cases among 5 to <12 of age males and females than COVID-19-associated hospitalizations given current age-specific COVID-19 cases and hospitalization rate estimates. Prevention of potential long-term sequelae of COVID-19 illness as well as other societal impacts would further increase the public health benefit of vaccination. Given all the above, the benefits of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine to prevent COVID-19 given as a two-dose, 10 μg dose level, primary series in children 5 to <12 years of age outweigh the known or potential risks» is the conclusion of the Comirnaty manufacturing company.

But precisely in relation to the alleged benefits, some members of the FDA Committee had expressed skepticism. Dr. Ball had stated that in the FDA’s analysis, the agency was unable to determine if there was an impact of vaccination on the “spread” of the virus (in short, if and how the vaccine blocks infections).

Boys more at risk from Pfizer jab side-effect than Covid, suggests study

James Hildreth, a member of the FDA advisory committee and also president of Meharry Medical College in Nashville, Tennessee, ultimately voted to authorize the vaccine, but said it was a “challenging decision”. Hildreth said he was surprised to learn data from the CDC that up to 40% of children in this age group have so far been infected with the coronavirus, which he says could mean that up to 30 million children may already have some form of immunity in the United States. “It seems to me somehow that we are vaccinating children to protect adults. It should be the other way around,” Hildreth said.

Eric Rubin, a member of the FDA Advisory Commission, and professor of immunology at Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, also admitted that “we decided to vote him with a heavy conscience,” according to Time. While Michael Kurilla, who heads a division within the National Institutes of Health, was the only member not to vote in favor of pediatric vaccinations. He abstained from voting, while all the other 17 members voted yes.

“Soon Covid Vaccines even for NewBorns”. Diktat by Italian Pediatricians & Physicians Sponsored by Gates’ Pfizer-GSK

«Kurilla expressed concern that Pfizer-BioNTech has not provided detailed data on what happens to the antibodies to the virus that children generate after they are vaccinated, and whether these decrease as they do in adults. He was also concerned about the possibility of vaccinating children who may have already been naturally infected with the virus and may not need further protection from an injection» the Italian newspaper Il Tempo reported.

It is important to understand what the real risks are for children contracting COVID, and to do so we can quote an excerpt from the official British Vaccine Board (JCVI) paper: “Symptoms that are observed in children and young people, they are typically mild and little different from other mild respiratory viral infections that circulate each year. Children recover quickly from these infections and, according to many studies, develop robust broad-spectrum immunity”.

Fabio Giuseppe Carlo Carisio
no reproduction without authorization





Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy


  1. I have no idea if the SARS-CoV-2 is a US bioweapon nor do I care one way or the other. As with any infectious disease, the determining factor is not the virulence of the pathogen but rather the weakened condition of the victim. If researchers can develop an infectious biological agent, microbe or virus, that can overwhelm and kill anyone regardless of the status of the their immune system, as it is passed from person to person it will eventually be passed around and come back to them thus killing the researchers who “created” it.
    In many poor countries a lack of food, often called malnutrition or starvation, is the primary cause of weakened immune systems. In the USA where there is an abundance of food, malnutrition is caused by nutritional deficiencies in the food caused by mineral deficiencies in the soil in which the food is grown. The obesity problem is a symptom of malnutrition. While it is said that obesity causes other heath problems, this is a scientific error in that the cause of the obesity is also the cause of other health related problems. This is a failure to comprehend causes, not unusual in agriculture or medicine.
    Bioweapons can only work against a malnourished population.

    • Gary. You’re not only correct, you’re absolutely correct. Keep on mind that the VT site has a military/political slant on most issues so the bioweapon trail. However a killer microbe gets loose it will decimate the weakest first which happened with Covid 19. I believe DARPA developed the virus as a germ weapon. Who released it and why is open to proof at this point. I believe that DARPA has Moderna on contract for an antidote for US soldiers when virus was ever released in “battle”. Just like vaccines given to soldiers going to the Middle East that failed. The Moderna vaccine may keep a soldier alive but side effects were of no concern. That’s the current scenario with the vaccines. A real crap shoot with odds that long term effects may be bad or just lead to more variants. So all the warriors getting jabbed are just part of the collateral damage. The story continues.

  2. Tommy, I would suggest you read “Nutrition and Physical Degeneration” by the late dentist Weston Price, D.D.S. In his book based on his travels around the world in the 1930’s, Price documents evidence, including photographs, that many isolated populations still on their native diet were immune to the white man’s diseases while nearby populations that had adopted the white man’s food lost their natural immunity. When I was young, I was taught that the white men explorers had spread diseases to other populations around the world. I was not taught, however, that for these populations first had to adopt the white man’s diet in order to get the diseases, smallpox included.
    When Price asked a native at an isolated location in north-west British Columbia why the natives did not get scurvy, the native replied that scurvy was a white man’s disease. When the native explained how they prevented scurvy, Price asked why he didn’t tell the white man how to prevent scurvy, the native replied that the white man had nothing to learn from the native population.

    • Please tell me why you can’t come right out and say that COVID-19 is a US bioweapon developed in a lab in North Carolina? Maybe you need Jim and Gordon to explain it to you.

    • I believe the Weston Price Society has been opposed to vaccines due to safety concerns for many years. Their position seems to be based on health and nutrition basis rather than political arguments.

  3. Tommy, there are two factors at work in any infectious disease, the virulence of the pathogen and the weakened condition of the victim. This is well illustrated by covid-19. Those most at risk are those with comorbidities. That these people have comorbidities is evidence that their immune system was in a weakened condition prior to their being infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The fact that more older people are most at risk is simply the result of more older people being in a weakened condition. To fight disease without addressing the overall weakened condition of the victim seems to me to be a scientific error.

    • Being as how COVID-19 is a US bioweapon is the biggest factor, Gary. This is exactly like when the Plains Indians were given smallpox-infested blankets by the US military back in the 19th Century. This wasn’t done to keep them warm in the wintertime.

  4. It seems that the mainstream media and most others do not understand what the 90.7% effectiveness means with respect to this vaccine and how this figure was determined. Let the buyer beware.

    • Yup, “efficacy” is a Faucism. It can’t be proven so it can never be disproved. The type of doublespeak raised to an art form by The Fauc. Why do you think he has a perpetual smirk on his face?

    • Remember, Gary, COVID-19 is a US bioweapon. It’s SUPPOSED to do this. When it was first deployed in China back in November of 2019, the kill rate was only 3.47 deaths per million. Now that it has been deployed in the USA, the kill rate has jumped up to 2,310 deaths per million. They must have gone back to the lab in North Carolina and come up with a new and improved version. As they used to say at General Electric, “Progress is our most important product.”

Comments are closed.